Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Amateur video vindicates Val's plume photo?; "End of Serenity"
Topic Started: Feb 13 2008, 12:00 AM (1,628 Views)
Andoo Inc.
Member Avatar
Sir finds a lot
JimBob
Mar 7 2008, 01:56 PM
Andoo Inc.
Feb 28 2008, 01:32 AM
A: disprove that there is not a 200 meter difference in the x direction from the center of the plume to the center of the crash

B: prove how it's logical that the plume can appear there despite the uknown z axis which has no bearing on the question at hand, which is the X axis (200 meters) "
I am working on a graphic representation of the area. I will address this when I am finished.
how long would we have to wait for you to bring up the same maps
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Just a stupid question... How difficult would it be for 2 people to go to Shanksville with an Estes model rocket, videocamera, and cellphones ?

Set the videocamera up where the picture was taken, and launch the model rocket from the crash site while using the cellphones for coordination.

Granted it would have no bearing on the plume size ( or would it ? ), but it would reflect where the plume should be.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

JFK
Mar 11 2008, 03:24 PM
Just a stupid question... How difficult would it be for 2 people to go to Shanksville with an Estes model rocket, videocamera, and cellphones ?

Set the videocamera up where the picture was taken, and launch the model rocket from the crash site while using the cellphones for coordination.

Granted it would have no bearing on the plume size ( or would it ? ), but it would reflect where the plume should be.
it would be relatively easy and the projectile could be launched within a 100 yards or so of the crater.......

this idea has been batted around in the past. i will give it some consideration and see what i can do on one of my trips.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JimBob
Trolls R Us
Andoo Inc.
Mar 11 2008, 03:02 PM
how long would we have to wait for you to bring up the same maps
Same map? What are you talking about?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Andoo Inc.
Member Avatar
Sir finds a lot
sorry for being vague. What aerial footage are you going to use to disprove the vector work which conclude the 200 meter offset. I'm only asking because I have viewed over head maps and there doesn't seem to be any issues with the vector mechanics at work. If people have a better source, they haven't told me and I was wondering if you had some magical better source to go off of to do any research necessary to counter the claims made.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JimBob
Trolls R Us
Andoo Inc.
Mar 11 2008, 07:03 PM
If people have a better source, they haven't told me and I was wondering if you had some magical better source to go off of to do any research necessary to counter the claims made.
I am planning on using a google map with lines drawn at 50 degrees to show the camera view. I'm sure it will look a lot like killtown's.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Popesture
Member Avatar
A No-Brainer No-Planer
Is this the photo?

Posted Image


And on that note check these..


Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Edited by Popesture, Mar 25 2008, 03:21 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Shanksville · Next Topic »
Add Reply