Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
There are still no eyewitness reports of a flyover
Topic Started: Nov 19 2008, 09:37 PM (1,362 Views)
pguillory

22205
Jan 28 2009, 04:06 PM
jthomasockpuppet
 
cmh/neit428 (erik dihle) blah, blah, denial, blah, ignorance, blah, blah, retarded comprehension skills, blah, blah...

the guy describes the c130 in detail LATER in that account, but FIRTS he mentions coming outside
and hearing at least one witness who said the plane bombed the pentagon and kept going.

but as usual the best you can do is show us how blindly faithful you are to the official lies,
by intentionally misinterpreting facts so that they fit within the confines of your biased and flawed view.

you realize jthomas, that no one - save a handful of sheople-minded skeptics here - believes or accepts
a word of your disinformation, dont you?

Why are we 'sheople'? You have the white doomsday plane flying thousands of feet in the air. You have the C-130 approx 3000 ft in the air. You have, as you theorize, a large commercial looking jet skimming the roof of the pentagon. Many witnesses when first interviewed mentioned the doomsday plane and the C-130. You are saying that no one would mention the spectacle of a large jet a few feet over the pentagon, because somehow they figured they shouldn't? Why would they think it was something they shouldn't mention? The pentagon is at the center of 3 major roadways. It was rush hour. All of the people in a position to see this amazing sight simply became so afraid that they mentioned everything, but that? The evidence is irrefutable that AA77 crashed into the pentagon. If you 'think' otherwise you have to come up with solid evidence of why that didn't happen. It has been 7yrs and no one in the world has seen solid evidence that AA77 didn't hit the pentagon. If such evidence exitsted the world would know about it. To use one person's tesitmony of a plane flying over the south parking lot, as proof the plane never hit the pentagon, is beyond foolish. Why would this be the only person to say he saw this? Did he not get the message that he was not suppose to mention that? Take some time to really think of what you want open minded intelligent people to believe and ask yourself why you 'think' such, without any real evidence to support it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »
Add Reply