| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Terral says don't bother me with your evidence... | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 8 2008, 10:26 AM (339 Views) | |
| Reddawn | Feb 8 2008, 10:26 AM Post #1 |
|
Although he directed this toward the JREF'ers, it's clear his point of view would apply to ANYONE who cares to debate him. I would think that would apply to the CIT crew or anyone else here. His mind is made up. He admits he doesn't even click on links or read opposing points of view. Don't waste your time on him anymore. Originally Posted by Terral Those of you pushing the Official Bush Administration Cover Stories (like here) are out of your cotton picking minds IF you really expect to convince me of anything at all. If my mind was not made up already, then I would make a poor debating opponent in this deliberation process. http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3413948&postcount=152 |
 |
 
|
| SPreston | Feb 8 2008, 11:30 AM Post #2 |
Patriotic American
|
Thank you for the excellent advice. 
|
|
|
|
| Terral | Feb 8 2008, 02:26 PM Post #3 |
|
911Truther
|
Hi RedDawn with Russell Pickering, Dylan Avery, Honway, Pentagon Reality Check, YCHTT, Craig Ranke and Killtown mentioned:
From RedDawn’s Opening Post, we can see ‘two links’ to my two ongoing WTC-7 and Pentagon debates where I am holding down the fort against a myriad of JREF ‘debunkers’ (heh) where about 90 percent have no brain in their head whatsoever. My Pentagon thread has 6000 reads and over 400 replies, while my Loose Change counterpart has 250 reads and 4 replies, so obviously much more of my time has been spent on the JREF Board than here. The WTC-7 thread has about 4000 reads and about 250 replies, so my hands have been a little bit full to say the least. On top of that I write on a Christian Board and a Messianic Jewish Board every morning before coming here. I would love to give more details, but the pea-brain knuckleheads with nothing else to do would start posting their stupidity over there too.
RedDawn is characterizing my statements, when I said no such thing. Lennart asked, “Did you even look at THIS SITE?” and I said,
The address included “. . .blogspot.com . . .” and I am not interested in reading the BLOG of anyone about how building fires took down the cotton picking Twin Towers or WTC-7. Everyone from the old LC Board knows I preach the WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Explanation the very same way you see my Opening Post written in the Loose Change WTC-7 Forum, which just happens to be the most read and busiest WTC-7 thread currently on the WTC-7 Board. Guess what? Nobody here is going to convince me that WTC-7 fell straight down into its own footprint in 6.6 seconds from building fires. :0) You can take that to the bank or use direct deposit . . . Therefore, if any of you Official Cover Story “Building Fires Did It” members want to ‘debate’ me on the WTC-7 Topic, then bring your arguments and pack two lunches; but your case will be made for the benefit of the ‘unbiased’ third-party reader actively engaged in judging the outcome of ‘our’ debate. If you want to try and prove that a 100-Ton Jetliner crashed into this empty Shanksville hole, OR crashed going 533 miles per hour into this tiny 18-feet 3-inch second story hole, then God bless you. Go for it! Give it your best shot, but I will not believe one single word; and you can put that on direct deposit too. When I came to the Loose Change Board last year, then I never heard of Lloyd England (I was calling him Lloyd London - heh), Barbara Honegger, the Arlington County After-Action Report, Alan Wallace, Carol Valentine, or any 7-minute fire, or any 60-hour Witness Assassination. Last year you could get me to look up just about any nonsense you pasted into the reply box, but people with names like Russell Pickering, Dylan Avery, Honway, Pentagon Reality Check, YCHTT, Craig Ranke and MANY others have shown me the Light since then. Now you will have a much more difficult time leading me around by the nose in circles with your Light Pole stupidly and nonsense. I credit Loose Change writers with helping me see ‘the’ Pentagon 911Truth more than people from all the other websites combined, because of the valuable research made available through our constant bickering back and forth; even if we have drawn different conclusions from the same evidence. The difference now is that I have taken the time to reconcile the seeming contradictions in all the eyewitness testimony and the evidence for what really hit the Pentagon. Since many of you have criticized me for a constantly changing my theories, then obviously my mind was not made up so firmly over the course of the past year. I ‘was’ willing to chase your rabbits down the wrong holes in the past, but not any longer ‘and’ especially when I have a hundred debating adversaries attempting to attack my debating position and my person at the same time. Will running over to view your BLOG change the Controlled Demolition ‘evidence’ for the WTC-7 case? No. Will reading your BLOG change the dimensions of the little second story impact hole in the E-Ring wall at the Pentagon? No. End of story . . .
RedDawn fails to realize that every 911Truther is writing for the benefit of the 'unbiased' third party reader judging the debate. The only reason to write against any of my OP proposals is IF you can find an error to cite and correct using your own evidence for the benefit of these readers. Period. If after reading my work you cannot find a single error, then the wisest thing is to shut up and appear wise. Do you really believe the big goose egg appears beside my “9:32 AM First Explosion” Topic, because nobody here will convince me to change a single word? No. None of you have an opposing argument that will make one lick of sense in light of all the EVIDENCE. The DoD operatives running around here do not want their handles connected to ANY "0932 AM" deliberations, or they risk the dreaded 'reassignment' memo. The idea that you are going to convert me over to the Official Cover Story LIE is preposterous, but please try to deceive and delude everyone else on my threads if that makes RedDawn happy. The fact is that I did take the time to answer Lennart’s post that you linked to in the OP. Right? You can also see that I took the time to post linking data to other JREF Board work for which I also started my own Skeptic’s Thread against Mark Roberts (aka = Gravy = he and Killtown I loathe . . .) here. I am keeping myself very busy writing on various 911Truth Topics all over the place, while defending my thesis statements, claims, evidence and conclusions at the very same time. Therefore, let’s not pretend that I am sitting back on my heels doing nothing, when in fact I was being very honest about not reading Lennart’s stupid BLOG. Where is RedDawn’s “AA77 Hit The Pentagon” Topic on the JREF Board or in the LC Pentagon Forum? Oh, he only has time to write Terral-bashing nonsense that only helps these readers define HIM and nobody else. Even if you disagree with everything I write, then at the very least you can see I am as serious about these 911Truth topics as anyone. The fact that my mind is made up is a good thing, because that simple fact makes me a good debating opponent to the Official Bushie Cover Story built completely upon FBI and DoD fabricated LIES. Now if you are finished trying to bash my head in with nonsense, then I would like to get back to the debates. GL, Terral Edited by Terral, Feb 8 2008, 02:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Killtown | Feb 8 2008, 04:09 PM Post #4 |
Childish Hypocrite
|
Sorry that I enforce the anti-spamming/hijacking threads rule at http://forum.911movement.org . |
|
|
|
| Terral | Feb 8 2008, 04:50 PM Post #5 |
|
911Truther
|
Hi Killtown:
Bullony. Anyone can see I 'had' only two threads (one now) on your entire Board and to this day only have 26 posts on many threads. You deleted my "Two Attack" (duplicate on LetsRoll) thread (moved or whatever you did with it) and put your sock in my mouth. Period. Why am I still in Purgatory? I know! Because Killtown wants to make sure nobody cares what hit the Pentagon any more than him. The "Two Attack" Explanation is 'the' 911Truth and your handler does not like me and knows very good and well that you cannot debate me on these Pentagon or WTC topics. Anyone can go over and look at each of my 26 posts to see no violations were committed at all. NONE. You are nothing but a fake 911Movement front for the real inside-job bad guys (like Painter at PilotsForTruth) and worthy of their same fate. The Pentagon was attacked at 9:32 AM, which is 0932 AM according to the Official FAA Timeline. Right? Doesn't that make you wonder about why the 9:31 AM and 9:32 AM times were sanitized from the Arlington County After-Action Report that never uses the term 'explosions' even one time in 215 pages? Does that sound a bit odd to a guy like you? :0) If you do not want your cover blown completely, then stop writing your nonsense in my direction. Otherwise our gracious mods might think you are trying to flame me into not speaking so nicely back in your direction. GL in the debates, Terral |
|
|
|
| Killtown | Feb 9 2008, 04:08 PM Post #6 |
|
Childish Hypocrite
|
1) I did not delete any of your threads. Why are you being dishonest? I merged it with your other one. 2) Being dishonest again. You were sent to Purg for insulting and mocking. 3) Who's "my handler"? 4) Lie #3:
5) Yes it does. I've never ruled out the attack time discrepancies. 6) Please, PLEASE, blow "my cover". I want to see who I really am. 7) Mean like when you started the flaming were here? 8) Why do you talk in the 3rd person?
Edited by Killtown, Feb 9 2008, 04:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Aldo Marquis CIT | Feb 9 2008, 04:09 PM Post #7 |
|
Terral is a sick man. He needs a mental evaluation. |
|
|
|
| Killtown | Feb 9 2008, 04:17 PM Post #8 |
|
Childish Hypocrite
|
Can't argue with that. |
|
|
|
| 22205 | Feb 9 2008, 05:14 PM Post #9 |
Arlingtonian
|
 :0) |
|
|
|
| Terral | Feb 9 2008, 05:38 PM Post #10 |
|
911Truther
|
Hi 22205:
While I can appreciate your efforts, the term “explosions” (plural) does not appear in the 911Commission Report (outside the notations) or in the ACAAR anywhere. Your search was for the singular term “explosion” that appears exactly six times in each of those bogus documents. GL, Terral Edited by Terral, Feb 9 2008, 05:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Reddawn | Feb 9 2008, 10:57 PM Post #11 |
|
I thought personal attacks weren't allowed here. Apparently I'm wrong. I guess we know the new ground rules. I only hope that when others return with such mature replys as yours they are afforded the same latitude. |
|
|
|
| Killtown | Feb 9 2008, 11:52 PM Post #12 |
|
Childish Hypocrite
|
Reddawn, yes or no, do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic » |
11:47 PM Dec 1
