Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Evidence Of Explosives Hurling North Tower 4 Ton; Wall Sections on Winter Gardens Roof
Topic Started: Oct 28 2008, 09:49 AM (921 Views)
JFK
Member Avatar

French St
Oct 30 2008, 08:29 AM
Below a video named "North Tower Exploding" from ae911truth. A clip of the North Tower shows abundant evidence of explosive demolition that is not adequately explained by the official narrative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtx_GcFCs6c

A rapid sequence of explosions, which destroys the building from top to bottom, is visible at the beginning of the collapse of the north tower.
Actually I find this rather damning evidence

Posted Image

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
JFK
Oct 30 2008, 08:54 AM
Actually I find this rather damning evidence

Posted Image



Yes indeed, as do I.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miragememories
Member Avatar

Miragememories
 
"Bazant, Greening, the NIST, no one has been able to explain how the WTC Twin Towers managed to
both, suffer complete floor failures occurring so fast and so synchronized that the whole upper sections
were able to impact with a uniform D R O P !"

As I expected Grit1645, you totally bypassed this critical issue.

This is the crux of the whole matter!

Yet you, claiming to be a structural engineer and a supposed truth seeker, totally avoid addressing this.

Why is that?

A designed core demolition would be the most obvious explanation for the D R O P.

A virtually instantaneous, complete floor failure blamed on pre-damage and heat weakening from random office
furnishings fires would not!.

MM
Edited by Miragememories, Oct 30 2008, 11:08 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miragememories
Member Avatar

French St.
 
"Below a video named "North Tower Exploding" from ae911truth. A clip of the North Tower shows abundant evidence of explosive demolition that is not adequately explained by the official narrative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtx_GcFCs6c

A rapid sequence of explosions, which destroys the building from top to bottom, is visible at the beginning of the collapse of the north tower."

The most telling thing in that video is the lack of a large mass centered
over the collapse acting as the 'virtual' pile driver that the Official Theory
believers argue had to be there.

The towers, largest in the world at the time, because of the huge weight they supported,
were necessarily engineered to be increasingly stronger towards their bases.

Amazing that anyone swallows the Official Story.

MM
Edited by Miragememories, Oct 31 2008, 11:38 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
French St
Oct 30 2008, 08:29 AM
Below a video named "North Tower Exploding" from ae911truth. A clip of the North Tower shows abundant evidence of explosive demolition that is not adequately explained by the official narrative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtx_GcFCs6c

A rapid sequence of explosions, which destroys the building from top to bottom, is visible at the beginning of the collapse of the north tower.
Good find French ST. Thanks.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Headspin
Member Avatar

JFK
Oct 30 2008, 08:54 AM
Posted Image

is that a fiery explosion as that piece hits the ground, bottom right? it hits wtc6 i think?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Headspin
Oct 30 2008, 10:05 PM
JFK
Oct 30 2008, 08:54 AM
Posted Image

is that a fiery explosion as that piece hits the ground, bottom right? it hits wtc6 i think?
I am not sure... But that kinda dispells the claim that the top portion's mass is what caused a total collapse.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Halifax

Grit1645
Oct 28 2008, 11:38 PM
There were, in 2006, some 256,000 WORKING civil engineers in the US (http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm), of which over 20,000 belong to the Structural Engineering Institute. AE Truth lists around 520 "architectural and engineering professionals" petition signers, of which only a small number are structural engineers. It would hardly be a stretch to say that less than 1% of the structural engineers and physicists in the US believe that WTC1, 2 and 7 were controlled demolitions. I have seen no evidence that this 1% has access to any knowledge or superior brain power that allows them to see what the rest of us cannot.
Grit, you put the same bull shit spin on things. Not every structural engineer in the U.S. knows about AE911truth.org let alone would join and put their name in lights effectively accusing the U.S. government of mass murder. So to assume that every structural engineer who is not an AE911truth.org member believes in the official fairy tale is an outright lie.

Your denial runs deep. So you actually believe the NIST WTC7 laughing stock report? Even the debunkers are running from that one. Debunkers are deniers or shills or just plain stupid. That's a fact. 9/11 was yet another false flag attack. Same shit, different decade. Get over it man.

I could care less if you want to continue to live your lie and stay in the matrix. That's your choice. But please keep your foolishness to yourself. To spread it is like spreading cancer. Why would you want to do that? Many people have already awoken to the truth and left the matrix. Many people have bailed the U.S. and are happy as hell living somewhere else. The U.S. ranks near the bottom in just about every category. Denial is a powerful force. While your ship is sinking, get on a life boat or drown. Your choice.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miragememories
Member Avatar

I suspect that Grit1645 is really e^n aka exponent.

In particular, his claim to being a structural engineer, smells strongly of a poor
masquerade.

MM

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Miragememories
Nov 1 2008, 07:24 AM
I suspect that Grit1645 is really e^n aka exponent.

In particular, his claim to being a structural engineer, smells strongly of a poor
masquerade.

MM

That suspicion is incorrect.... Unless of course e^n has decided to move to a different country.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miragememories
Member Avatar

My apologies Grit1645.

MM
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · World Trade Center · Next Topic »
Add Reply