Photoshopping at the Pentagon

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Photoshopping at the Pentagon; opinion of Jack White's studies
Topic Started: Feb 5 2008, 12:05 PM (615 Views)
noeffects	Feb 5 2008, 12:05 PM Post #1
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	Here is some analysis of pentagon photos by Jack White. No he's not from the White Stripes.Photoshopped Pentagon Any opinions or has this already been hashed out here before?
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 5 2008, 12:11 PM Post #2
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Debunked.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Feb 5 2008, 12:20 PM Post #3
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	The Bob Pugh video footage puts most of his claims to rest.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


Sureshot	Feb 12 2008, 09:46 PM Post #4
Your glorious Loose Change Forum dictator... Posts: 415 Group: Admins Member #1 Joined: 12/21/07	Hey could you guys show me some articles debunking this? I've seen this website before and always wondered if it was good or just bull



JimBob	Feb 12 2008, 11:03 PM Post #5
Trolls R Us Posts: 245 Group: BANNED! Member #314 Joined: 02/12/08	Before accepting Jack White's opinion on 9/11, take a look at his past attempts to shed light on historical events. On his photo studies page, http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies1.htm he claims that a low resolution photo of the Apollo LEM shows a photo left there. He goes on to claim that NASA refuses to explain it. If you look at the high resolution version of the photo (which he as a "trained observer" would have seen) the photo is actually revealed to be a piece of foil reflecting back at the camera. So, is White a poor researcher, prejudiced, lying, or just picks out evidence to his liking and ignores the rest?



Terral	Feb 13 2008, 06:57 AM Post #6
911Truther Posts: 87 Group: BANNED! Member #142 Joined: 01/20/08	Hi Noeffects with our two distinguished Light Pole guys mentioned: Quote: Noeffects >> Here is some analysis of pentagon photos by Jack White. No he's not from the White Stripes. Photoshopped Pentagon. Any opinions or has this already been hashed out here before? Do not be fooled by the CIT “debunked” claims, because they are out in the middle of Washington Blvd with all their paddles on the same side of the boat doing circles around Lloyd’s Light Pole Fantasies. You have started a very good thread on a very good topic where Jack White has some things right and something things dead wrong. However, a real investigation into his findings requires us to look at each picture individually for drawing well-informed conclusions. Yes. Jack White has found some photoshop trickery going on with these Pentagon pictures, but he also makes some mistakes along the way. Therefore, if you really want to debate this topic properly, then present us with an example one frame at a time and we can examine the substance of his claims, evidence and conclusions for each case. For example: This picture is a good example where Jack White is dead wrong, because the upper picture shows the warning sign standing right in front of the Heliport concrete slab, but the bottom picture is of a similar sign standing hundreds of feet to the north. That is the reason you can see around the north end of the Pentagon, while the upper picture shows the heliport pad (like this) hundreds of feet to the south. Examples like this appear to be real examples of photoshopping where we see the car pinned between the two guardrails. This one has Pole #5 apparently floating in midair. Many of the photoshopped pictures I have seen mirror this one with a single guardrail in one picture ‘and’ two at the same location. The most obvious examples of photoshopping appear with the mysterious moving vehicles that start off in front of Column Line (CL) 8 here and here end up moved down to CL 4 here. These vehicles were moved so the DoD Jet debris could be removed from in front of CL 9 shown here (first picture) and here. The DoD/FBI inside-job bad guys have photoshopped MANY pictures to hide the evidence of the 9:36:27 AM Jet attack (second attack described here) that sat directly next to the Green SUV (shown here and here from this pic) in many of these pictures. After all, if the 911Truth gets out that a DoD Retrofitted Jet actually went BOOM against the Pentagon wall at 9:36:27 AM, then people would realize no real 100-Ton AA77 Jetliner crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. :0) Therefore, we have tons of photoshopped pictures circulating for this Inside-Job Pentagon case and plenty of so-called Crime Scene Investigators trotting around yelling “Debunked.” and “The Bob Pugh video footage puts most of his claims to rest.” without even having a clue . . . GL, Terral Edited by Terral, Feb 13 2008, 07:02 AM.



SuperSkepticSlut	Feb 13 2008, 07:25 AM Post #7
Troublemaking Troll Posts: 21 Group: BANNED! Member #312 Joined: 02/12/08	As if there couldn't be more than one sign or landing pad? What are you suggesting that he faked the crashes, he faked the terrorists, he faked the damage to the pentagon?



look-up	Feb 13 2008, 11:20 AM Post #8
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies8.htm It is clear that these yellow signs are not one and the same... different location.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Feb 13 2008, 11:51 AM Post #9
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Stare at the photos and marvel at the the amazing effects of foreshortening all you like but there is NO evidence here. There isn't a reason on earth to photoshop a light pole floating in mid-air when there were 5 light poles sitting on the ground. There is zero reason to photoshop a car between guardrails. There is VIDEO FOOTAGE of all of this people. Independent footage from a fine citizen and professional free-lance news videographer who was there within minutes after the event and is also a PATRIOT who questions what happened on that day. See Bob Pugh in Loose Change Final Cut. (oh and he like everyone else did NOT witness or experience 2 violent events outside the building like Terra's "thesis" requires) They did not need to fake images. The operation was pulled off just fine with barely ANY plane debris on the scene according to the video footage and all witnesses. This is yet another fine example of Terral trying to authoritatively send you down a rabbit hole while simultaneously attacking CIT with his sickening sarcastic tone. Not a single poster on this board supports your "thesis" Terral. Why do you stick around where you are not wanted? Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Feb 13 2008, 11:52 AM.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


look-up	Feb 13 2008, 11:57 AM Post #10
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	yea that photo analysis was about as bad as all of the TV fakery and WTC no planes studies... very poorly done.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


SPreston	Feb 13 2008, 01:05 PM Post #11
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	Terral Lee Croft Therefore, we have tons of photoshopped pictures circulating for this Inside-Job Pentagon case and plenty of so-called Crime Scene Investigators trotting around yelling “Debunked.” and “The Bob Pugh video footage puts most of his claims to rest.” without even having a clue . . . You Terral have been successfully debunked several times and you still do not have a clue.



Terral	Feb 13 2008, 01:32 PM Post #12
911Truther Posts: 87 Group: BANNED! Member #142 Joined: 01/20/08	Hi Preston: Quote: Preston >> You Terral have been successfully debunked several times and you still do not have a clue. What a gas! Bring it hotshot! Here or here. Aldo started a good Skeptic's Thread, but none of you have one reply to Post #2 where Domenick encourages you to "Pick Away." I am assuming he is not talking about your nose either. :0) You CIT boys should stick to your Light Pole Fantasies. We only have five or ten Light Pole Threads and you need at least another two hundred and fifty or so. :0) GL, Terral Edited by Terral, Feb 13 2008, 01:38 PM.



Gideon524	Feb 13 2008, 03:13 PM Post #13
Oh, you didn't know? Posts: 521 Group: Admins Member #4 Joined: 12/21/07	Terral Feb 13 2008, 01:32 PM Hi Preston: Quote: Preston >> You Terral have been successfully debunked several times and you still do not have a clue. What a gas! Bring it hotshot! Here or here. Aldo started a good Skeptic's Thread, but none of you have one reply to Post #2 where Domenick encourages you to "Pick Away." I am assuming he is not talking about your nose either. :0) You CIT boys should stick to your Light Pole Fantasies. We only have five or ten Light Pole Threads and you need at least another two hundred and fifty or so. :0) GL, Terral Read the rules again, Terral, and knock off the personal attacks. See you in a week.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »