Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
general shanksville discussion.....
Topic Started: Oct 13 2008, 06:56 AM (1,489 Views)
DoYouEverWonder

Domenick DiMaggio
Jan 7 2009, 01:05 AM
that little red truck actually is the entire stoystown fire department. they just happened to be the first on the scene. i do believe there is video from later in the day that shows a shanksville truck at the crash site but i need to check that so don't hold me to saying any shanksville truck actually was at the site.
According to their website, they own at least 3 firetrucks that are currently in operation. I would assume that they already owned at least a couple of these trucks on 9/11, since two of them were built in the 70's. They also show 5 pieces of retired equipment, but it's hard to say when they trucks were 'retired' if it was before or after 9/11.

You would think in a rural community like Shanksville, that they would have sent out everything they had when they got the call that a passenger jet was down? My local fire dept sent out at least 8 trucks to my house last year, that all arrived at about the same time, when we called for a minor fire in the attic.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

DoYouEverWonder
Jan 7 2009, 06:27 AM
Domenick DiMaggio
Jan 7 2009, 01:05 AM
that little red truck actually is the entire stoystown fire department. they just happened to be the first on the scene. i do believe there is video from later in the day that shows a shanksville truck at the crash site but i need to check that so don't hold me to saying any shanksville truck actually was at the site.
According to their website, they own at least 3 firetrucks that are currently in operation. I would assume that they already owned at least a couple of these trucks on 9/11, since two of them were built in the 70's. They also show 5 pieces of retired equipment, but it's hard to say when they trucks were 'retired' if it was before or after 9/11.

You would think in a rural community like Shanksville, that they would have sent out everything they had when they got the call that a passenger jet was down? My local fire dept sent out at least 8 trucks to my house last year, that all arrived at about the same time, when we called for a minor fire in the attic.
its possible they still have 3 trucks. i went there twice. both times the place was locked and vacant. its all volunteer so thats to be expected i imagine. however, the 2nd trip was the time the truck photographed on 9/11 was parked outside the firehall. you can get a feeling looking at the pics that it is quite small but when you see it in person it really is mind boggling that such a small truck responded to the alleged crash of a 757.

not that they needed to either mind you. from my conversations with bob blair and doug miller i gathered they extinguished all the fires themselves before this truck even arrived on the scene.

just think had 2 guys been near the pentagon with a fire extinguisher or two in their trucks they could have had that 757 jet fuel fire put out long before the collapse of the wall. well.......maybe not. :blink:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DoYouEverWonder

Domenick DiMaggio
Jan 7 2009, 08:15 AM
DoYouEverWonder
Jan 7 2009, 06:27 AM
Domenick DiMaggio
Jan 7 2009, 01:05 AM
that little red truck actually is the entire stoystown fire department. they just happened to be the first on the scene. i do believe there is video from later in the day that shows a shanksville truck at the crash site but i need to check that so don't hold me to saying any shanksville truck actually was at the site.
According to their website, they own at least 3 firetrucks that are currently in operation. I would assume that they already owned at least a couple of these trucks on 9/11, since two of them were built in the 70's. They also show 5 pieces of retired equipment, but it's hard to say when they trucks were 'retired' if it was before or after 9/11.

You would think in a rural community like Shanksville, that they would have sent out everything they had when they got the call that a passenger jet was down? My local fire dept sent out at least 8 trucks to my house last year, that all arrived at about the same time, when we called for a minor fire in the attic.
its possible they still have 3 trucks. i went there twice. both times the place was locked and vacant. its all volunteer so thats to be expected i imagine. however, the 2nd trip was the time the truck photographed on 9/11 was parked outside the firehall. you can get a feeling looking at the pics that it is quite small but when you see it in person it really is mind boggling that such a small truck responded to the alleged crash of a 757.

not that they needed to either mind you. from my conversations with bob blair and doug miller i gathered they extinguished all the fires themselves before this truck even arrived on the scene.

just think had 2 guys been near the pentagon with a fire extinguisher or two in their trucks they could have had that 757 jet fuel fire put out long before the collapse of the wall. well.......maybe not. :blink:
There's a series of pictures taken by amateur photographer David Escherich, who arrived on the scene just has the first rescue crew arrived.


Escherich took 10 pictures, but I've only seen 3 of them. They are located at the link: http://www.stoystownfire.com/flight93.htm


Quote:
 
A few years back, amateur photographer David Escherich of Stoystown snapped a photo that went global within hours.Today, his photograph is part of a New York City exhibit that will run through 2010. In September, Escherich and a few friends boarded a bus and traveled to see his photo on display at the Tribute World Trade Center 9/11 Visitor Center at ground zero.

On Sept. 11, 2001, Escherich snapped the picture of downed Flight 93 and captured international attention following the click of his 35-mm camera’s shutter. “I was going through Friedens when I saw a huge plume of smoke, unlike anything I’ve ever seen before,” Escherich said. It wasn’t long before an announcer on the Meyersdale radio station broke in to report a downed plane in Somerset County. Escherich continued on with his day and stopped at the Stoystown post office. He was aware of the devastation at the World Trade Center.

At the Stoystown post office, a friend encouraged him to investigate what had happened. With his camera in his car, Escherich decided he would. Not long after the crash, Escherich was on the scene. Emergency personnel were only just arriving. Undetected, he grabbed his camera and set up his tripod and fired off 10 shots before being asked to leave.

“I was about 150 yards away from where the plane hit,” he said. “But then I did as they said. I packed up and left.”

Escherich knew the images he just captured were important, so he immediately had them processed.
Within 90 minutes of the crash, he shared his historic photo with a local newspaper and it was printed the next day. The following day, The Associated Press sent the Shanksville photo around the world. It is believed that Escherich captured the first images of the crash site.

“It’s been a hobby for me for over 20 years, ever since I was forced to retire from Bethlehem Steel,” he said. “I always have my camera with me.”

<snip>

Escherich has mixed feelings about his accomplishment with the photo.

The image is of a very somber time in the history of the United States. For that reason, it is hard to be elated over the recognition.
“It gives me a good feeling my photo was chosen. But I’m not overwhelmed,” he said.

The photo enthusiast never has received a dime for the photo. And in many cases, it has even cost him with the multiple printings he has done over time.

Escherich recalled his sense of disbelief when he arrived at the scene of the downed aircraft.

“There wasn’t a trace of an airplane,” he said. “There was only a crater where it made impact. I’m not a real emotional person, but I am saddened by the whole thing.”

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:GbAKbBN6EhsJ:www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_279235635.html/resources_printstory+%22David+Escherich%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us&client=firefox-a



If it's true that Escherich's pictures were taken within the first 15 minutes to half hour after the crash, they are invaluable as evidence of what the scene looked like before it was disturbed very much. They also give us a snapshot of the response (or should I say lack of response) by the fire rescue crews.

After looking at these pictures, there's a number of things that don't make sense:

1. A passenger jet crashes and sets off a large explosion, that a number of people see, yet the fires that totally destroyed a good size section of woods are completely out, before the fire department got there.

2. Even if there was no fire, there seems to be no hurry for anyone to search for survivors. From the eyewitness accounts, it sounds like everyone went up to the hole and said gee there's nothing here and then stood around waiting for the FBI to show up. It's apparent that aside from the crater that the burnt out woods were also part of the crash site and it's hard to see past the smoke. You would think people would be all over that area hoping to find survivors.

3. One more oddity, there's a red helicopter in the 2nd and 3rd picture. Have any of the eyewitnesses mentioned a red helicopter and has this copter ever been identified?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

i have spoken with david and have got his entire story. he agreed to tell it on film and make copies available of all the photos to me. really nice guy [as almost everyone i have spoken with here is].

so at some point i do plan on documenting his account and getting all of his photos shown to the public.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

None of the 3 pictures has valid exif data, the second one has been through photoshop, the third one has been cropped and does have Hewlett Packard in the file header.

The "helecopter" looks like a lens anomoly to me... The actual pics resolution is better as they have been resized on that page.

I would post them but I will respect the fire departments wishes regarding their "no right click" script.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hamba

Has an exact timeline and description of the events of what happened at Shanksville been developed yet. I recall that such a timeline was being developed.

A well written well formatted description detailing times of the events, and descriptions of the events. Like at 11am 2 fighter jets were seen there probably doinga recon etc.

Such a document would be useful in enabling people to clearly define the events of the day and can therefore provide one super theory of the events, so to prevent people from getting confused or getting stuck on blatantly false stories like A-10's etc.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DoYouEverWonder

JFK
Jan 6 2009, 08:09 AM
DoYouEverWonder
Jan 6 2009, 06:19 AM
Domenick DiMaggio
Jan 6 2009, 12:04 AM
Zaphod 36
Dec 29 2008, 07:28 AM
7) said it took off almost vertical

Could it have been a "Vertical Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle"(VTUAV)?
Mcelwain claims she has seen no wings on the plane. Did other witnesses saw any wings on that plane?
Is it possible that this plane was propelled with a rotor, like the Boeing X-50 Dragonfly UAV? Link

Is it possible for a jet-propelled plane to take off almost vertical?
that is most certainly an odd looking plane but no witnesses ever made any mention of any sort of propeller.
The reason why I raised the questions is that I came across some pictures of the Stoystown Fire Dept doing hazmat and terror attack training. They are all dressed the same has on 9/11 and at least a few of the guys in the training pictures are the same ones pictured on 9/11.

Also, the fact that they only sent an antique fire engine to respond to a passenger jet crash seems odd to say the least.

The response to the Crash of Flight 93 on 9/11
Most likey the reason that that particular truck was sent is because the location was off road and that truck weighs much less than a standard pumper loaded with 3000 gallons of water, tons of gear and hose, and is less likely to get stuck.

Here they still use 1950's vintage military vehicles converted to firetrucks for off road emergencies.

Supposedly the ground was so soft that it swallowed an entire passenger jet whole.

Yet, these big heavy trucks are parked all around the 'crash' site.

Obviously, the ground wasn't that soft or they wouldn't have driven these trucks out on it.

Posted Image

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
bretwalda

119th video: "Attempted to intercept"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Shanksville · Next Topic »
Add Reply