| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| comparison footage of flight 77 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 12 2008, 12:15 PM (470 Views) | |
| logos | Oct 12 2008, 12:15 PM Post #1 |
|
i always wondered what the heck the pentagon footage of flight 77 showed ![]() then i came across this video and noticed an amazing similarity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETX71UsiPds remember this is technically a car on wheels driving at 750+plus miles an hour... but check the dust trail!! you cant really even see the car now compare it to this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs when u think about how close the "plane" was to the ground and that its barely visible... there's a lot of similarities.. also remember that if it was a missile at the pentagon, then it wouldnt be much larger than the rocket powered car in the land speed vid. |
![]() |
|
| logos | Oct 12 2008, 12:25 PM Post #2 |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8 at 25 seconds... check the dust trail as well my opinion, that white thing in the fl 77 video is not a plane or a missile... its the dust traill of a missle flying stupidly low to the ground Edited by logos, Oct 12 2008, 12:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| ShaDow | Oct 12 2008, 01:14 PM Post #3 |
|
May I ask why a missile would have a dust trail? When it was flying over grass/roads? |
![]() |
|
| 22205 | Oct 12 2008, 02:07 PM Post #4 |
|
Arlingtonian
|
while i commend your interest and your efforts, i think you have to get newer info dear logos. the trail in that video (5 frames), was in my opinion put there to confuse and divert everyone. there was no missile. do some searching in the pentagon section of this forum and get familiar with updated information about the pentagon incident. in particular find the thread with the video: the North Side Documented, where a group of Arlington National Cemetery workers were interviewed about what they saw on 9/11. i was there as these ANC witnesses were asked about there being anything else in the sky, and not one of them saw any missiles or global hawks or anything else. at least 4 of these people were in a definite position to see a missile approach from north or south of the citgo, and they did NOT see such a thing. a 2-engined, commercial in appearance airliner, flew towards the building, thats what they saw. i dont blame you for trying to make sense of the 5 frames that were released, i too was on that same tip for a long time, but that video has been manipulated and alterred. at the very least, the plane should be should be closer to the camera, since it flew NORTH of the citgo. i cant tell you what that white streak is, but it is not the plane and it is not a missile. in fact, i doubt there was ever any white streak that day when the event occurred. that white streak is an after-the-fact piece of so-called evidence, which successfully managed to delay the truth from coming out. while people like myself and many others all got hooked on to the streak and missile theories, we were diverted from finding out the plane's actual path on 911. but thanks to CIT's efforts, eventually the truth of the final path of the plane became known. so once you get familiar with the newer evidence, you too might finally graduate past the missile disinfo. good luck. you may wanna start here: http://www.thepentacon.com/ |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · American Flight 77 · Next Topic » |







7:27 AM Nov 9