| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Did the Clintons want the towers down; Who wanted the Towers Down | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 9 2008, 03:05 PM (615 Views) | |
| drzaus | Oct 9 2008, 03:05 PM Post #1 |
Dr Zaius
|
I have been speaking with others on the next about a possibility that Bush did not have any involvment in the bringing down the towers but that the Clintons did. The Clintons were in office for 8 years and would have a better oppertunity and more to gain. Someone suggested that their financial records be investigated thoroughly. Their point was that they wanted to scare America into either wanting them back in office in some way shape or form or for Al Gore to be forced in as President along the lines that "at least he was Vice- President" Have anyone else heard about or think this scenario is plausible. Dr. Zaius |
 |
 
|
| Flippy | Oct 9 2008, 05:18 PM Post #2 |
|
Bill Clinton saw the same memos indicating that an attack on America was imminent by Al Qaeda. Also, Bill Clinton notified Bush of the threat of Al Qaeda and OBL prior to leaving office. We need a new investigation. |
|
|
|
| trust_nobody | Oct 9 2008, 06:02 PM Post #3 |
|
Im sure clinton knew of the attacks because all former presidents have access to CIA memorandum. I highly doubt he had any direct involvement with the attack...however anything is possible at this point in time. |
|
|
|
| Flippy | Oct 9 2008, 07:46 PM Post #4 |
|
I'd be more willing to believe Clinton had something to do with 9/11, than the village idiot, George Walker Bush. Edited by Flippy, Oct 9 2008, 07:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
| UKperspective | Oct 12 2008, 11:29 AM Post #5 |
|
If you believe that a US president had anything to do with the planning of 9-11 then I doubt that George W Bush could have had the time to. He was only in office for a few months and planning the whole operation would have taken years. I personally think that Bush and his government are guilty of gross misconduct. It is clear that they have used the event's aftermath and covered up many details. Like their links to the Bin Ladens and the justification for illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. If you persue the line that a US president was involved with organising this, then I don't believe that you would get anywhere with that particular argument. |
|
|
|
| drzaus | Oct 14 2008, 03:20 PM Post #6 |
|
Dr Zaius
|
So then are we following the wrong trail, should we be investigating the Clintons more because of their actions? Cause its obvious they want back in the White House bad. Dr Zaius |
|
|
|
| UKperspective | Oct 14 2008, 05:52 PM Post #7 |
|
Dr Z, I don't know if you have ever been in a position of responsibility, even less a position in the public eye like Bill Clinton, who was curtailed for half his presidency with a ridiculous sex scandal and the threat of impeachment and an opposition who wouldn't even call him "president". I don't know when you think he had the time to be involved in such a scheme. My impression is that people who achive high office such as US president or UK Prime minister spend 98.9% of all their time in office firefighting as each new problem crops up. These men have hair which goes grey in a very short spell of time, they loose weight, they are constantly attacked by the media and need advisors to help their public image. Even if you consider that George W Bush isn't putting on an act and he is actually "thick". The man will be constantly at the end of his tether with the enormous stress an extreme schedule of his duties in office. As much as I do not like him, I cannot believe that he had anything to do with planning anything to do with 9-11. All he is is an actor who stands up and makes speeches on the TV. Bill clinton is the same, this much greater man (in my view) suffered terribly in his time in office. These men will spend most of their time following advice from advisers because they just will not have the time to be able to make desisions themselves. The continual round of speeches and dinners and meetings will leave them in a constant spin. The people who we should all be looking at, in my view are those lieutenants and back room men. People who have spent years working in the system and who can make the real desicions. Those who have the experience and influence to steer the government policy... |
|
|
|
| BoneZ | Oct 14 2008, 06:47 PM Post #8 |
|
I'm not sure whether Bush had a hand in 9/11, but he certainly knew and continued to do things because of it. He is an accomplice no matter what. The Clintons may not have had a hand in 9/11 and since the voter fraud of 2000 took place, Bush was probably set to be president no matter what and help carry out 9/11. |
|
|
| drzaus | Oct 15 2008, 12:27 PM Post #9 |
|
Dr Zaius
|
The Fact is the Clintons had 8 years to plan what they originally couldnt get done in '93, George Bush only had 8 months. They tried to get Al Gore Elected to still have a hand in the cookie jar, but when that Failed they went ahead with the Plans and hoped they would find a way to have the citizens of the US vote them back with emergency powers. All Bush is, is a guy that got stuck with a pile of crap dumped on his lap and has tried to do his best to clean it up. And dont take this the wrong way but the President of the United States IS the most Powerful man in the free world, so he has plenty of time to do anything he wants. So 8 years of "Bubba" planning his return was enough time for him or them as in the the Clintons to plan this. Dr Zaius |
|
|
|
| BoneZ | Oct 15 2008, 02:41 PM Post #10 |
|
I have no idea where you're getting your information from, but you must be living in the "opposite day" world. Everything you said is the total opposite from what is actually happening. Bush said it would be better if this were a dictatorship as long as he was the dictator. And we're pretty damn close right now because of Bush's policies. Bush has done his best to take advantage of the American people, trample on their rights, abuse his power, break many laws, and the list goes on. How you can say he's done his best to clean it up is far beyond comprehension in the real world. And what transpired on 9/11 had very little to do with the Clintons or Bush for that matter. The constructors of what happened on 9/11 signed their names to a document called PNAC. The signators of PNAC are likely the ones responsible for 9/11. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz. The same three that tried this same exact thing in the 60's, but instead of Iraq, it was with Russia. The following video explains how Rumsfeld, Cheney and Wolfowitz did it back in the 60's and you can then understand how they did it in the 2000's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3defm8SQ9o Edited by BoneZ, Oct 15 2008, 02:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
| UKperspective | Oct 16 2008, 02:26 AM Post #11 |
|
I go along with Bonez being closer to the truth than Drzeus. I am aware that Bush spends his life playing a "Mr Stupid" because he learned early on that this was how to appeal to the average voter. He isn't a stupid as he actually makes out, but it doesn't make any sense that he could have the hands on the controls of this. I agree that if it is a "hidden government" job then PNAC look as guilty as sin. My personal feeling though is that PNAC wanted something like this to happen and made hay when it eventually did. I still think the actual truth is far stranger than we can yet understand. Many people on here are concentrating on details and putting 2 and 2 together to make 5. How about if WTC 1 and 2 were genuine terrorist incidents, completely genuine caused by hijacked planes flown by arabs. With genuine collapses which just happened to be so extraordinary that the Truthers are fixated with trying to prove something that isn't actually true, BUT To accelerate the event, the Military missiled the Pentagon and pulled building 7. This would explain why the US Government have been so cagey. Why the acencies are so unhelpful etc.. |
|
|
|
| Lord Tsukasa | Oct 17 2008, 06:21 PM Post #12 |
|
Yes, of course! It all makes sense now. George W. Bush was already a convincing mastermind, but it makes much more sense that the Clintons were behind these crimes. "Bush knocked down the Towers".. Ha! Just more propaganda disseminated by the Liberal media. 9-11 Was a Clinton Job! In all seriousness.. This scenario is not true, because it relies on the Clintons planning this on their own and attacking America for their own political benefit. Now, those who study 'the bigger picture' know that the man in charge of America since 1981 has been George H.W Bush. Bill Clinton's presidency was as fake as Dubya's is. Bush 41, being a member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, has close ties to the Society of Jesus and the other parts of the Vatican elite. Bill Clinton was trained at one of the Society of Jesus' most prestigious universities. Bill Clinton is also a member of the Trilateral Commission (Along with George H.W Bush) and the Bilderberg Group (Along with his wife). The Clintons are in on the game. The Bush and Clinton families are on the same team. Al Gore is in on the game too, being a Freemason like both George H.W Bush and Bill Clinton, and also being a member of the Club of Rome, another front for the elite. Do you see how all of these players are connected by the secret society network? There was involvement on the part of the Clintons. As I said, they were in on the game. Bill Clinton severely reduced the amount of fighter jets that were on alert in the US during his term, which helped impede the US military on 9-11. He was also playing fake President during the 1993/1995/1999 PsyOps (1993 Bombing, OKC Bombing, and Columbine), all of which were 'prep Ops' for the Big Op on 9-11. The issue I've seen brought up many times is that alleged Flight 77 passenger Barbara Olson may have been killed because she exposed Clinton. She was, however, the wife of Ted Olson, a Bush associate and the attorney of Jonathan Pollard, the Israeli spy. Barbara Olson made one of the famous cell phone calls that 'proved' the official story, so it looks like the Olsons were in on the game as well.
Exactly. The organizations that were responsible for carrying out the attacks are the ones that have been in control of every Black Op. The US Military-Intelligence Community and the Military-Industrial Complex. The attacks were planned and ordered by the elite from the highest levels.
The sex scandal was a scripted part of the rigged game of American politics. What gives that away is that "Wag The Dog" (A superb piece of predictive programming) predicted the Lewinsky shenanigans eerily accurately exactly a month before they happened. Lone Gunmen, anyone? The common misconception being made by everyone in this post is that it has to be a 'Bush Job' or a 'Clinton Job'. This is 'surface level' stuff. When you start to understand that all of these politicians are on the same team, you'll get a clearer view of what's going on. You won't know everything, but you'll be better off than those who are still stuck on "Bush/Clinton Did It". Edited by Lord Tsukasa, Oct 18 2008, 08:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
| hanuri | Oct 18 2008, 06:13 PM Post #13 |
|
I´ll go w lord tsukasa. he has tied some knots since 911 was obviously a false flag operation and they simply don´t plan those in few short months. th ebush jr admin was something the planners had been waiting for who knows how long. |
|
|
|
| scott75 | Oct 20 2008, 06:20 PM Post #14 |
|
You guys may want to look at the following articles: "9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush" (President's brother) http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911security.html "[Marvin] Bu$h Family Babysitter Killed in Fairfax" (this page has more info besides the mysterious death of the family babysitter) http://911review.org/Media/Babysitter_Marvin-Bush_Enron.html Edited by scott75, Oct 20 2008, 06:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Sayf Udeen | Nov 6 2008, 06:17 AM Post #15 |
|
Welcome to the forums, drzaus. |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Welcome Newcomers! · Next Topic » |
6:21 PM Nov 29
