NIST Fire Simulation Fraud

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

NIST Fire Simulation Fraud; Does not match photographs
Topic Started: Oct 8 2008, 07:42 PM (419 Views)
Chris Sarns	Oct 8 2008, 07:42 PM Post #1
Posts: 173 Group: Members Member #116 Joined: 01/17/08
Posts: 173 Group: Members Member #116 Joined: 01/17/08


Miragememories	Oct 9 2008, 06:55 AM Post #2
Posts: 757 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08	Here's the NIST graphic representation of fire movement on the 12th floor. By 5:00 p.m., it's obvious that even NIST's computer simulation is showing a decline in fire activity in the critical northeast corner around column 79 (upper right). Serious, high temperature fire in this area of the 12th floor was a prerequisite for causing the 13th floor failure of column 79, as concluded by the NIST. MM Edited by Miragememories, Oct 9 2008, 06:56 AM.
Posts: 757 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08


Miragememories	Oct 11 2008, 08:35 AM Post #3
Posts: 757 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08	This is the NIST idea of accurate computer modeling. I hate to think what the NIST would have considered unacceptable for their model? MM
Posts: 757 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08


arie	Oct 13 2008, 03:40 PM Post #4
Posts: 8 Group: Members Member #814 Joined: 08/25/08	MM, please note that you are comparing the video frame with NIST's 'no external damage' scenario. When you look for their simulation of the scenario with external damage you'll notice that they don't show anything above the 24th floor and they don't show the north side (now why would that be?). I did a small write up about it: http://www.911blogger.com/node/17436
Posts: 8 Group: Members Member #814 Joined: 08/25/08


Miragememories	Oct 14 2008, 07:51 AM Post #5
Posts: 757 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08	arie Oct 13 2008, 03:40 PM MM, please note that you are comparing the video frame with NIST's 'no external damage' scenario. When you look for their simulation of the scenario with external damage you'll notice that they don't show anything above the 24th floor and they don't show the north side (now why would that be?). I did a small write up about it: http://www.911blogger.com/node/17436 Thanks for the correction arie and the link to your site. I already got my wrist slapped over at JREF for that mistake. This is closer to what I wanted to show; MM
Posts: 757 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · WTC 7 · Next Topic »