How would a new investigation work?

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

How would a new investigation work?; What questions would you ask? To whom?
Topic Started: Jan 31 2008, 02:17 PM (532 Views)
defaultdotxbe	Feb 1 2008, 01:38 PM Post #26
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08	Headspin Feb 1 2008, 01:26 PM defaultdotxbe Feb 1 2008, 11:43 AM the investigators (in this case the 9/11 commission) had access, and it was their job to determine whether charges should be filed, they determined charges were not to be filed Quote: you, as a member of the general public, do not have the rights to see the evidence, i, also as a member of the general public, also do not you're making it up as you go along. what have i gotten wrong?
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08


Diane	Feb 1 2008, 01:47 PM Post #27
Posts: 54 Group: Members Member #168 Joined: 01/21/08	defaultdotxbe Feb 1 2008, 01:24 PM again, why would they have any special insight? most of them would just be office workers same as anyone else in the towers Obviously, some people in the CIA and SEC would have more "special insight" than others. I already said that other tenants should be interviewed as well. And, yes, the security people should certainly be interviewed, along with people in building management, maintenance, etc., which I already mentioned.
Posts: 54 Group: Members Member #168 Joined: 01/21/08


Diane	Feb 1 2008, 01:51 PM Post #28
Posts: 54 Group: Members Member #168 Joined: 01/21/08	defaultdotxbe Feb 1 2008, 01:38 PM Headspin Feb 1 2008, 01:26 PM defaultdotxbe Feb 1 2008, 11:43 AM the investigators (in this case the 9/11 commission) had access, and it was their job to determine whether charges should be filed, they determined charges were not to be filed Quote: you, as a member of the general public, do not have the rights to see the evidence, i, also as a member of the general public, also do not you're making it up as you go along. what have i gotten wrong? The original topic had to do with a hypothetical new *official* investigation, i.e. one with subpoena power, whereas, above, you seem to be talking about an investigation by private citizens. Perhaps this is just a misunderstanding. Edited by Diane, Feb 1 2008, 01:52 PM.
Posts: 54 Group: Members Member #168 Joined: 01/21/08


defaultdotxbe	Feb 1 2008, 03:10 PM Post #29
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08	Diane Feb 1 2008, 01:51 PM defaultdotxbe Feb 1 2008, 01:38 PM Headspin Feb 1 2008, 01:26 PM defaultdotxbe Feb 1 2008, 11:43 AM the investigators (in this case the 9/11 commission) had access, and it was their job to determine whether charges should be filed, they determined charges were not to be filed Quote: you, as a member of the general public, do not have the rights to see the evidence, i, also as a member of the general public, also do not you're making it up as you go along. what have i gotten wrong? The original topic had to do with a hypothetical new *official* investigation, i.e. one with subpoena power, whereas, above, you seem to be talking about an investigation by private citizens. Perhaps this is just a misunderstanding. well headspin asked why he (i assume he was referring to himself personally) couldnt know who had made the investments prior to 9/11, i am clarifying that an official investigation would have access to private data that an unofficial one would not, but apparently im making it all up as i go along
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2