In Plane Site

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

In Plane Site
Topic Started: Sep 28 2008, 04:14 AM (497 Views)
Phil Jayhan	Sep 28 2008, 04:14 AM Post #1
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #187 Joined: 01/22/08	Edit by JFK - Embed video Edited by JFK, Sep 28 2008, 08:34 AM.
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #187 Joined: 01/22/08


A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A	Sep 28 2008, 09:37 AM Post #2
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08	35-47 minutes (The POD & flash) are now explained btw so everyone knows. See here 1:25 onwards - ingore the B.S before it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0 Edited by A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A, Sep 28 2008, 09:38 AM.
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08


JFK	Sep 28 2008, 10:47 AM Post #3
Posts: 4,220 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Ahem... Well if you watch videos of both crashes the flash occurs a few milliseconds prior to impact. As far as the pod, you are another which has clearly ignored this - http://www.amics21.com/911/report.html
Posts: 4,220 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


BoneZ	Sep 28 2008, 11:44 AM Post #4
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	JFK Sep 28 2008, 10:47 AM As far as the pod, you are another which has clearly ignored this - http://www.amics21.com/911/report.html All that link is is pure deception and apparently falsely stating what any amateur researcher can find out in a matter of a few minutes. In "PURPOSE OF THE ANALYSIS", this "analysis" falsely states that "all commercial airliners have a cylindrical fuselage...". All commercial airliners' fuselages are not cylindrical under the wings. There are two cylindrical "objects" under the wings on many airliners' fuselages called wing fairings. These two wing fairings are clearly highlighted in the first series of images and the "analysis" even states as such: Quote: Figure 1: Presence of two cylindrical objects on the underside of the fuselage. The rest of the images are poor lighting and angles and therefore the wing fairings are not clearly visible. And if you want to get technical, there are more than two cylindrical objects under the fuselage in the first set of images. People pick and choose what they want to see or what they want others to see. Very deceptive. For the past 7 years, close-minded people have been falsely stating that there was a "pod" under the fuselage of flight 175. Now, by posting this link, JFK suggests there were two "pods" under the fuselage of flight 175. There were two "pods" under flight 175. But they're known as wing fairings, clearly visible and perfectly explained for the past several years here: http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/pod.html#fairing Edited by BoneZ, Sep 28 2008, 11:47 AM.
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


JFK	Sep 28 2008, 12:55 PM Post #5
Posts: 4,220 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	BoneZ Sep 28 2008, 11:44 AM JFK Sep 28 2008, 10:47 AM As far as the pod, you are another which has clearly ignored this - http://www.amics21.com/911/report.html All that link is is pure deception and apparently falsely stating what any amateur researcher can find out in a matter of a few minutes. In "PURPOSE OF THE ANALYSIS", this "analysis" falsely states that "all commercial airliners have a cylindrical fuselage...". All commercial airliners' fuselages are not cylindrical under the wings. There are two cylindrical "objects" under the wings on many airliners' fuselages called wing fairings. These two wing fairings are clearly highlighted in the first series of images and the "analysis" even states as such: Quote: Figure 1: Presence of two cylindrical objects on the underside of the fuselage. The rest of the images are poor lighting and angles and therefore the wing fairings are not clearly visible. And if you want to get technical, there are more than two cylindrical objects under the fuselage in the first set of images. People pick and choose what they want to see or what they want others to see. Very deceptive. For the past 7 years, close-minded people have been falsely stating that there was a "pod" under the fuselage of flight 175. Now, by posting this link, JFK suggests there were two "pods" under the fuselage of flight 175. There were two "pods" under flight 175. But they're known as wing fairings, clearly visible and perfectly explained for the past several years here: http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/pod.html#fairing Why is only one appendage visable then ?
Posts: 4,220 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


BoneZ	Sep 28 2008, 05:53 PM Post #6
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	JFK Sep 28 2008, 12:55 PM Why is only one appendage visable then ? If there were only one "appendage" visible, then why did the auther say there were two? In the end, it all comes down to what you want to see. The analysis clearly shows two "cylindrical objects" which are the two wing fairings and the author even stated as such. If you want to see one "appendage", you're more than welcome to your opinion, but it would not be truthful or factual.
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


Sureshot	Sep 28 2008, 06:08 PM Post #7
Your glorious Loose Change Forum dictator... Posts: 415 Group: Admins Member #1 Joined: 12/21/07	If there were wing fairings then why does it not show symmetrically on the underside of the plane in this photo:



BoneZ	Sep 28 2008, 06:26 PM Post #8
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	Sureshot Sep 28 2008, 06:08 PM If there were wing fairings then why does it not show symmetrically on the underside of the plane in this photo: It does. It shows perfect symmetry. I've highlighted with arrows the main areas where the sun is shining the brightest, including the wing fairing that's being highlighted by the sun. Once again, it's all about what you want to see. Edited by BoneZ, Sep 28 2008, 06:29 PM.
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A	Sep 29 2008, 09:06 AM Post #9
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08	JFK Sep 28 2008, 10:47 AM Ahem... Well if you watch videos of both crashes the flash occurs a few milliseconds prior to impact. As far as the pod, you are another which has clearly ignored this - http://www.amics21.com/911/report.html I HAVE watched both videos and if you read my posted correctly you'd see I was talking about the POD and NOT the flash on the north tower. I already know the flash on the north tower happened first (and seemed to be bigger than the plane itself, which I've never heard anyone mention) but the south tower is at the same slip second the front of the plane touches.
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08


mynameis	Oct 8 2008, 04:41 PM Post #10
Internet Jujitsu Posts: 1,567 Group: Members Member #50 Joined: 01/15/08	BoneZ Sep 28 2008, 06:26 PM Sureshot Sep 28 2008, 06:08 PM If there were wing fairings then why does it not show symmetrically on the underside of the plane in this photo: It does. It shows perfect symmetry. I've highlighted with arrows the main areas where the sun is shining the brightest, including the wing fairing that's being highlighted by the sun. Once again, it's all about what you want to see. Why are the engines at different horizontal axis from the wing? Is that the aircraft yaw? Edited by mynameis, Oct 8 2008, 04:41 PM.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · 9/11 Video Research Archive · Next Topic »