The downed light poles were staged in advance.

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2
3
4

The downed light poles were staged in advance.; ..not by a plane, explosives, or vortex.
Topic Started: Jan 31 2008, 02:02 PM (2,316 Views)
Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 13 2008, 03:34 PM Post #76
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	sevon Feb 13 2008, 03:23 PM look-up Feb 11 2008, 11:35 AM there are precidents in the energy and forces used, and we're trying to determine whether those precidents and "common sense" arguements add up. Scientific principles and results are not limited to what people believe to be "common sense". Common sense is subjective, science is not. Oh then can you point out the scientifc report that documented the plane's interaction with the light poles?
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


sevon	Feb 13 2008, 05:58 PM Post #77
Posts: 408 Group: BANNED! Member #256 Joined: 02/01/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Feb 13 2008, 03:34 PM sevon Feb 13 2008, 03:23 PM look-up Feb 11 2008, 11:35 AM there are precidents in the energy and forces used, and we're trying to determine whether those precidents and "common sense" arguements add up. Scientific principles and results are not limited to what people believe to be "common sense". Common sense is subjective, science is not. Oh then can you point out the scientifc report that documented the plane's interaction with the light poles? You clearly missed the point of my post. As to your question, I'm not aware of any scientific report regarding the plane's interactions with the light poles.
Posts: 408 Group: BANNED! Member #256 Joined: 02/01/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 13 2008, 11:06 PM Post #78
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	sevon Feb 13 2008, 05:58 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Feb 13 2008, 03:34 PM sevon Feb 13 2008, 03:23 PM look-up Feb 11 2008, 11:35 AM there are precidents in the energy and forces used, and we're trying to determine whether those precidents and "common sense" arguements add up. Scientific principles and results are not limited to what people believe to be "common sense". Common sense is subjective, science is not. Oh then can you point out the scientifc report that documented the plane's interaction with the light poles? You clearly missed the point of my post. As to your question, I'm not aware of any scientific report regarding the plane's interactions with the light poles. No I didn't. Perhaps you should realize that since there were no scientific reports on the matter all we are left with is 'common sense'. Then you should ask yourself why there was no scientific report or documentation of the matter to being with.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
4