| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Flight 93 Phone Call Anomalies; explosion and white smoke from plane | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 28 2008, 09:43 PM (797 Views) | |
| Domenick DiMaggio | Jan 28 2008, 09:43 PM Post #1 |
|
Moussaoui Trial Evidence From the above evidence presented at the Moussaoui trial we learn the following information : Jeremy Glick's Phone Call At 9:37:41 lasts until 11:43:49am. Todd Beamer's Phone Call At 9:43:48 lasts until 10:49:29am. Which indicates a connection between the airphone (where the calls originated) remained active long past the crash time. The calls are shown as they would be billed. They are not the recipients but the originators. If Glick and Beamer were on the plane that is alleged to have crashed in Shanksville there is no way for their phone calls to last past the 10:03 'official' crash time. Every call is documented and where it originated from on the plane. Every call from every flight. Well every call but 1 that is. The call which no information is available for is the call made by Ed Felt at 9:58:00. This call to 911 placed Felt inside the planes bathroom. He makes no mention of any revolt or that the passengers had taken a vote to revolt. Unlike all other passengers he snuck into the bathroom and hid while others are alleged to have openly made phone calls. He is the only passenger that called 911. His call was taken by John Shaw and listened in on by his supervisor Glenn Cramer of West Moreland County 911. FBI immediately took the recording into their possession following finding out of its existence and both Cramer and Shaw have been gagged but only after Cramer is alleged to have told the NYTimes that Felt never mentioned any explosion or smoke. Then he was no longer allowed to speak with anyone else about the call. Taking Lee Purbaugh's account as truth that the plane he saw was flying right side up and had a grey belly (Clip #2) then it is most likely that these passengers were on 2 seperate flights. Pittsburgh Post Gazette
|
![]() |
|
| look-up | Jan 30 2008, 12:14 PM Post #2 |
|
I don't know about the switching planes theory, but it certainly makes some sense that the calls were not made from the planes, except for Ed Felt's call. That one call seems the most realistic. If terrorists were taking over a plane and really meant to kill every one of the passengers, would they let them call home to say goodbye? I don't know. I can't exactly prove the calls were faked, but we've shown that the technology exists to fake the calls, and the motive is certainly there, so anything is possible. However, if the evidence you presented above is being interpreted correctly, it seems that some of the calls lasted longer than they should have. |
![]() |
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Jan 30 2008, 06:34 PM Post #3 |
|
That's the governments evidence. The JREF tried to say that the discrepancies with Beamer & Glick's calls is because that is the length the recipient stayed on the line so it was still connected and the recipients bill but that is not the case in regards to any of the phone calls. In order for those calls to last the length of time presented in court the plane had to be intact until at least 10:49 and until 11:43. The phone calls presented by the gov are the phone calls made from the plane, the location they were made, the person said to have made them, and the length of the calls. That is impossible from inside an airplane that has allegedly shattered into thousands of pieces and burrowed 20-40' deep into the ground. It's like calling someone then setting your phone on a bomb and expecting the call to still be connected after the bomb explodes. Ed Felt called 911 for help on 9/11. He is the only passenger to do that. |
![]() |
|
| look-up | Feb 7 2008, 02:38 PM Post #4 |
|
why would they lie about what time the thing crashed though? just asking... |
![]() |
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Feb 7 2008, 11:01 PM Post #5 |
|
there's 3 minutes they don't want to have to account for. an eyewitness flight path needs to be established for this flight. I could speculate lots of things but until there's some flight path established it's all baseless speculation. i'm not going to engage in that. but there are a couple of possibilities i can think of to want 3 minutes to vanish from the cvr & fdr |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · United Flight 93 · Next Topic » |






3:51 AM Dec 2