| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| View of WTC7 roof! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 2 2008, 09:46 PM (708 Views) | |
| MacXL | Sep 2 2008, 09:46 PM Post #1 |
|
Amazing that after the collapse of WTC2 and WTC1, the roof of WTC7 is free of dust!![]() Edit by JFK - embed attached image Edited by JFK, Sep 2 2008, 09:54 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| skunkrider | Sep 3 2008, 09:29 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
hey guideon, will you warn me again if I let out my honest opinion about posts like these, or do you actually have a good day? blegh! |
![]() |
|
| MacXL | Sep 11 2008, 07:28 PM Post #3 |
|
Please let me know what is so wwrong with this posting? |
![]() |
|
| skunkrider | Sep 16 2008, 03:16 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Firstly, I can see "dust" on top of WTC7. Here it's on the left-handed side. Secondly, WTC7 was about 100m away from the towers. Even though debris was ejected wide around the towers, the angles and fly-curves of those debris parts simply landed below the roof level of WTC7, which is why there was damage to the Southside / Southwest corner of the building. Does that explain it to you, or do you plan to elaborate on why it is important whether there's dust on WTC7's roof or not? This is not condescence, this is curiosity. |
![]() |
|
| Tim Riches | Sep 16 2008, 03:39 PM Post #5 |
|
Might have just been an observation. That is an amazing photo. Thanks for sharing it, no matter what the reason! (thanks jfk for embedding it also!) There is no way that a standard collapse could have created that much dust. Amazing! Seems to be a day for reinforcing certain things in the mind. Another was Zombie America's posting of the Pentagon poster. Simple and elegant. Edited by Tim Riches, Sep 16 2008, 03:43 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| skunkrider | Sep 16 2008, 06:13 PM Post #6 |
![]()
|
ok, the picture is awesome of course.. maybe i've seen pictures and video too often to appreciate the strangeness... it's just like a volcano having erupted anywhere near new york sending pyroclastic clouds down it's hills.. |
![]() |
|
| MacXL | Sep 16 2008, 06:22 PM Post #7 |
|
I have been very involved in the BBC Conspiracies WTC7 Forum, following the BBC presentation in July 2008. Go to their site about it and check the forum, over 600 postings on the subject! Since December 2005, I have seen a lot a DVDs, pictures, books, and magazines like the globaloutlook.ca ones. We have been told for a long time that WTC7 collapse was due to impact and fires from WTC1. When NIST presented in August 2008, then it was only THERMAL EXPANSION that cause the collapse, ... I could not simply beleive that their video showing a full collapse due to Column 79! PLease watch the full NIST Official Video of the presentation! But if you only have 5 minutes of your time, at around 37 minutes! I would recommend a question from a Baltimore journalist to NIST: How did you rule out CD and Steven Jones? The NIST answer is that you would need about 100 lbs of thermite at column 79 to produce the collapse of that crucial column! ... and then the following question from the same journalist is : if fire was sufficiant to do a complete collapse, why do we need 100 lbs of thermite? watch the answer of NIST on this ;-) Sorry that I was not clear! Being on LC Forum, I thought that showing a picture of WTC7 clear of dust on the roof when we have been told for years that debris and impact and fire cause the collapse, I was expecting beams and bigger parts from the 110 floors WTC1, ... THIS IS my first picture of an aerial view of WTC7 after collapses of WTC1+2, and wow if you see dust there, you vision is 100/20. Best regards, MacXL |
![]() |
|
| Miragememories | Sep 17 2008, 09:18 AM Post #8 |
|
A good link to this would be useful. MM |
![]() |
|
| skunkrider | Sep 17 2008, 09:31 AM Post #9 |
![]()
|
NIST Presentation Video Pt. 4 and... NIST Presentation Video Pt. 5 will show what MacXL was referring too. Of course you can check out the whole thing by starting with... NIST Presentation Video Pt. 1 To say it the German way: Der Kerl verzapft ausschließlich gequirlte Kacke!
|
![]() |
|
| MacXL | Sep 17 2008, 06:54 PM Post #10 |
|
http://video.google.ca/videosearch?q=nist+2008&hl=fr&sitesearch=# In one segment, then the 37 minutes will work. |
![]() |
|
| SPreston | Sep 18 2008, 07:27 AM Post #11 |
|
Patriotic American
|
Nice NIST music video you found. Entire NIST WTC 7 Presentatation (jump to 37 min) Another view of OP photo
Edited by SPreston, Sep 18 2008, 07:45 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| MacXL | Sep 18 2008, 04:46 PM Post #12 |
|
Thank you SPreston for fixing the link. I also had this picture! Just behind the WTC7 building, we could see a sharp spindle of beams, it will eventually fall down straight to the ground, and not falling sideways as expected. Edited by MacXL, Sep 25 2008, 07:10 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · WTC 7 · Next Topic » |




wtc7.jpg (149.37 KB)




11:40 PM Nov 25