Do these WTC7 columns show thermite cuts?

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

Do these WTC7 columns show thermite cuts?
Topic Started: Aug 31 2008, 11:03 AM (1,636 Views)
allbury	Sep 6 2008, 07:58 AM Post #26
Posts: 5 Group: BANNED! Member #830 Joined: 09/06/08	JFK Sep 5 2008, 06:08 AM If you want to talk with Albury, please move you [sic] conversations to the Skeptics forum as he is no longer allowed to post here. Another triumph for the cause of "truth." This isn't an honest discussion forum, it's a place that promotes a DVD full of lies, and only permits people to post on here if they agree with them. Is "JFK," who presumably blocked me from participating here, one of the shameless 9/11 profiteers behind Loose Change? I have presented numerous valid reasons why thermite or explosives couldn't possibly have been used to collapse any WTC building, and instead of addressing them like mature, rational adults, you simply prevent me from posting so you can continue to misrepresent facts about 9/11 without any accountability for your claims. The idea that explosives or thermite were planted in the WTC is completely absurd, and not supported by the slightest bit of credible evidence, but using censorship tactics like these is to be expected from people dishonest enough to promote this "theory." I'm wondering what triggered the decision to keep me out of the discussion, "JFK." Was it my suggestion that people voicing disagreement with the NIST findings should at least read http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1CollapseofTowers.pdf and http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf? Or was it my legitimate questions concerning Barry Jennings' story? This is the first format I've seen that only permits one side of a discussion, and I'd find it appalling if it weren't so genuinely comical.
Posts: 5 Group: BANNED! Member #830 Joined: 09/06/08


Miragememories	Sep 6 2008, 08:59 AM Post #27
Posts: 752 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08	Had you been interested in an honest discussion, we all might have benefited. Your bigotry and arrogance are clearly displayed in your last post; "..The idea that explosives or thermite were planted in the WTC is completely absurd, and not supported by the slightest bit of credible evidence.". MM
Posts: 752 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08


allbury	Sep 6 2008, 09:09 AM Post #28
Posts: 5 Group: BANNED! Member #830 Joined: 09/06/08	This pretty well sums up the honesty of the Loose Change people who have blocked me from posting here: http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
Posts: 5 Group: BANNED! Member #830 Joined: 09/06/08


allbury	Sep 6 2008, 10:12 AM Post #29
Posts: 5 Group: BANNED! Member #830 Joined: 09/06/08	Miragememories Sep 6 2008, 08:59 AM Had you been interested in an honest discussion, we all might have benefited. Your bigotry and arrogance are clearly displayed in your last post; "..The idea that explosives or thermite were planted in the WTC is completely absurd, and not supported by the slightest bit of credible evidence.". MM Then feel free to present some before the thought police block this user name too. That's a clear indication that someone on here isn't interested in an honest discussion. I've yet to hear a valid explanation for the fact that no burned column ends were found in the debris of any WTC building, and none with cutter charge signatures either, and both of them would have been impossible to miss if there had really been a C/D. And since you probably think Larry Silverstein bombed his building because the "truth" movement flat-out LIED about what he really said in regard to the FDNY's decision to pull the firefighting effort from WTC 7, can you explain why all 11 or so of the insurance companies covering his losses paid him? Do insurers generally hand out billions after someone publicly confesses to insurance fraud? Just wondering...
Posts: 5 Group: BANNED! Member #830 Joined: 09/06/08


JFK	Sep 6 2008, 11:07 AM Post #30
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	What MM said Allbury. You were confined to the skeptics section. You created a sock puppet. Both your accounts shall now be banned as well as any future accounts you create.
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Grit1645	Sep 6 2008, 03:31 PM Post #31
Posts: 305 Group: BANNED! Member #797 Joined: 08/12/08	JFK Sep 6 2008, 11:07 AM What MM said Allbury. You were confined to the skeptics section. You created a sock puppet. Both your accounts shall now be banned as well as any future accounts you create. Don't you think that's a little harsh? He's asking questions - people are supposed to question the "official story" but not the "alternate story"?
Posts: 305 Group: BANNED! Member #797 Joined: 08/12/08


JFK	Sep 6 2008, 03:52 PM Post #32
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Grit1645 Sep 6 2008, 03:31 PM JFK Sep 6 2008, 11:07 AM What MM said Allbury. You were confined to the skeptics section. You created a sock puppet. Both your accounts shall now be banned as well as any future accounts you create. Don't you think that's a little harsh? He's asking questions - people are supposed to question the "official story" but not the "alternate story"? No. I do not think I am harsh at all. He had his chance to remain albeit it confined to the skeptic forums, but blew it with his sock puppet. The questions were not sincere.
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


illeagalhunter	Sep 9 2008, 08:04 AM Post #33
Posts: 174 Group: Members Member #81 Joined: 01/16/08	Why isn't there a single picture of WTC7 in Meyerowitz's book "Aftermath"? there is its about 6 /7 pages in
Posts: 174 Group: Members Member #81 Joined: 01/16/08


frank nada	Dec 17 2008, 03:50 PM Post #34
Posts: 28 Group: Members Member #969 Joined: 12/17/08	Quote: This picture, however, seems a little bit suspicious to me: http://www.mediumrecords.com/wtc/blg7.012.jpg the difference comes down to merely lighting and angle as far as i see
Posts: 28 Group: Members Member #969 Joined: 12/17/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · WTC 7 · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2