The dead, the undead and the living dead

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

The dead, the undead and the living dead; was the identities really confused?
Topic Started: Aug 29 2008, 06:43 AM (387 Views)
caribou	Aug 29 2008, 06:43 AM Post #1
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08	Now, there´s been a lot off claims and counterclaims about some of the hijackers being alive and well or not. Some people claim that that this story originated in a confusion of identity and now the problem has been solved and everybodys happy! Thats not what i have heard, they saw the photographs of themselves and their personal security number. So, my question is: These people who claim to have been wrongfully accused of being terrorists and...uh....dead... ...are they sticking with their story? Has anyone interviewed them after the initial story broke?
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08


Headspin	Aug 29 2008, 09:28 AM Post #2
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	yes, daily telegraph, guardian, bbc, saudi and morrocan press, some even went direct to the FBI I believe, unfortunately this story has been obfuscated to oblivion. The FBI obtained the passenger manifests even before flight 93 allegedly crashed in shankesville. from the manifests they released the names of 19 arab hijacker suspects. Later the FBI release a different list with 4 different names for the flight 11 hijackers (Atta'a name stayed but 4 others changed). In order to switch 4 named suspects from the manifests, there should have been at least 9 arab names on the manifest - but there were only 5 (maybe 6). So it appears the FBI used arab names that were not on the manifests (!). so if these names were not on the manifests how did the FBI know of them so early on? any argument of stolen identities does not work, because if they used false IDs, there is no way of knowing exactly who they were, never mind whether or not they were even arabs. for a clear account read this: Jay Kolar - Hidden History of 9/11 http://www.amazon.com/Hidden-History-9-11-Paul-Zarembka/dp/158322825X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1219974620&sr=8-1
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


caribou	Aug 29 2008, 01:40 PM Post #3
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08	i´d wish someone could track them down and interview them again, film them and put it up on youtube Kind of wonder why it hasn´t been done. Any links to the original news stories? I´ll do some research myself meanwhile...
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08


caribou	Aug 29 2008, 01:54 PM Post #4
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08	A rebuttal from BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI. The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy. We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report. We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names. In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time. We recently asked the FBI for a statement, and this is, as things stand, the closest thing we have to a definitive view: The FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, the 9/11 investigation was thoroughly reviewed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and the House and Senate Joint Inquiry. Neither of these reviews ever raised the issue of doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers.
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08


caribou	Aug 29 2008, 01:59 PM Post #5
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08	Ponder this statement "In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time"
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08


Headspin	Aug 29 2008, 02:43 PM Post #6
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	"A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity" "FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks" how does "confusion" change to "positive identification" if the guy says "i'm alive".
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Headspin	Aug 29 2008, 02:45 PM Post #7
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	caribou Aug 29 2008, 01:40 PM i´d wish someone could track them down and interview them again, film them and put it up on youtube Kind of wonder why it hasn´t been done. Any links to the original news stories? I´ll do some research myself meanwhile... kevin barrett went to morroco to do just that. don't recall the details, but "officials" refused access to the alive suspects.
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


caribou	Aug 30 2008, 02:48 PM Post #8
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08	Headspin Aug 29 2008, 02:43 PM "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity" "FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks" how does "confusion" change to "positive identification" if the guy says "i'm alive". Yeah, and this guy is still on the list, they seem to have kept some of the names and changed the pictures, but they seem to be sticking to this guy as a hijacker, although he claims to be alive,although he could hardly have "confused" himself with someone else, when his picture could be seen on TV all over the world. Edited by caribou, Aug 30 2008, 02:54 PM.
Posts: 13 Group: Members Member #491 Joined: 04/12/08


A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A	Sep 19 2008, 09:51 AM Post #9
Posts: 28 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08	Remember the 3 Saudi Royals that died after it came out they knew about 9/11 BEFORE it happened? No doubt that these 6 living "hijackers" are now dead. Good thing their interviews with the Daily Telegraph still exist. [Funny how no "martardom" video has ever been released of any of these 19[/b] Edited by A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A, Sep 19 2008, 09:52 AM.
Posts: 28 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08


jonlukasc	Nov 10 2008, 06:40 AM Post #10
Posts: 2 Group: Members Member #929 Joined: 11/10/08	wow so the BBC was knowingly behind this vast conspiracy they gave themselves away by reporting early building 7's collapse and they just oops reported that the hijackers are still alive. does that really make sense. just like ABC reporting northwoods in 2000 but they are behind this great cover up.
Posts: 2 Group: Members Member #929 Joined: 11/10/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Hijackers · Next Topic »