Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Fastest Little 757 That Ever There Was; 84th RADES data for all to see V2
Topic Started: Aug 23 2008, 10:37 PM (166 Views)
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
Posted at the Above Top Secret thread C-130 video confirms 84th RADES Data

Posted Especially For The Enjoyment Of The Pseudoskeptics On This Forum

C-130 RADES Data flight path 15 miles to the southwest apparently headed for Arkansas
instead of Minnesota (shown with blue stick pins)
Posted Image

Another huge discrepancy in the faked 84th RADES data, which I have just noticed. I want you Reheat and beachnut to have the pleasure to see it first, so you can get your denial act fully in gear. Go for the gold guys.

At the 9:38 blue stickpin (C-130) which is next to the 9:36:48 red stickpin, (Flt 77) the alleged 757 has 12 seconds to reach the Pentagon wall at the official 9:37 time. By measuring, I have determined the distance from that position to the Pentagon to be 5+ miles. Dividing 5 miles by 12 seconds gives a result of .417 miles per second. Multiplying .417 by 60 gives a result of 25.02 miles per minute. Multiplying 25.02 by 60 gives a result of 1501.2 mph. That is one fast little 757.

Did you do that Reheat?

1501.2 mph for an ordinary 757 without rocket assists?

Is that your Amazing Randi Forum Of Illusionists mathematics in action?

Do you guys need more proof that the RADES was faked?


On another note, checking the C-130 speed from the same spot at 9:38, the C-130 arrives next to the Pentagon at 9:39:35. Dividing 5 miles by 95 seconds gives a result of .05 mps. Multiplying .05 by 60 gives a result of 3 mpm. Multiplying by 60 gives a result of 180 mph for the C-130. Hmmmm. Seems kinda slow. But I guess it can fly that slow.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
NO. I was mistaken. I forgot that the RADES did not end at 9:37. I also forgot that the RADES went to the position at 13:37:36 North of the Citgo and than a right turn to the last position at I-395 at 13:37:47.

I apologize.

Quote:
 

38 52 05.584 N 077 03 39.502 W (Last entry, "impact" into 395)
38 52 16.862 N 077 03 48.703 W (North of Citgo)
MISSED RETURN (Big gap)
38 51 23.672 N 077 05 37.274 W (SW of driving range)

Quote:
 

Figure 6 is a Google Earth image marked with the RADES returns for AAL77 for the same interval plotted in Figure 1. From a visual examination, the pattern is essentially the same. After 13:37:12 the plane’s altitude was too low to be discernable by radar. The radar sweep pattern gives a return once every 12 seconds. The final two returns at the Pentagon will require further investigation beyond the scope of this analysis. At this time the altitude (a few hundred feet at best) would have rendered a radar return impossible from the scenario of impact. This is verified by the fact that a low flying helicopter detected in the Doubletree Hotel videos19 ~10 minutes earlier over I-395 was NOT captured on the RADES radar as it flew through this same area at low altitude20. The time stamp for this last return corresponds to the final time stamp in the FDR file, 13:37:47 (data error at 13:37:48, actual time of return 13:37:47.810).
http://911files.info/77/fdr_analysis/NTSB_RADES%20Comparative%20Analysis.pdf
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »
Add Reply