Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
NYP press whore calls truthers lunatics; new york post first responders
Topic Started: Jan 24 2008, 01:51 PM (329 Views)
mynameis
Member Avatar
Internet Jujitsu
PURE OBSCENITY
LUNATICS TAKE OVER GROUND ZERO
PrintEmailDigg ItRedditPermalinkStory Bottom

By STEVE CUOZZO

scuozzo@nypost.com
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01232008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/pure_obscenity_564638.htm?page=0

The NY Post's 'Obscene' Gesture to 9/11 Trut
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/01_08/240108_nypost_gz.html
Edited by mynameis, Jan 24 2008, 01:51 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lin Kuei
Member Avatar

this is absolutely VILE

Quote:
 
News Corporation is the umbrella company for an empire that also includes the Fox News Channel, the recently launched Fox Business Network, the New York Post newspaper

good old wholesome Murdoch-owned news
Edited by Lin Kuei, Jan 24 2008, 03:02 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
look-up
Member Avatar

yep... vile indeed. they are linking the activists to peddlers of souveniers. have any of the NY truthers ever tried to sell anything at ground zero? My guess is that they haven't.

I'm looking for an email address for this asshole.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lin Kuei
Member Avatar

look-up
Jan 24 2008, 03:07 PM
I'm looking for an email address for this asshole.

scuozzo@nypost.com ?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
look-up
Member Avatar

here it is.

scuozzo@nypost.com - scumbag who wrote the article
letters@nypost.com - letters to editor
aaquilina@nypost.com - "administration"

be nice, just show him that he is wrong. copy his superiors as well. let them know that 9/11 truthers are neither obscene nor are they selling anything.

Ask for a retraction, in a polite, respectful tone, of course.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
look-up
Member Avatar

I just sent this to the addresses in my last post.

when we respond in a respectful tone, we get results. that is the only way to get people to listen. yelling and ranting doesn't accomplish anything.

Quote:
 
Dear Sir or Maddam,



I am writing because I was made aware of an article written by Steve Cuozzo about Ground Zero and the activities taking place there.



While I agree that this is "sacred ground", and that it should be treated with the utmost respect, I disagree with Mr. Cuozzo about who is welcome there.



Many of the victims' family members have rallied there, and according to Bill Doyle, leader of the largest victims group, over half of his members believe that the events of 9/11 were orchestrated by an apparatus that includes some members of our own government.



You may have heard the mantra, "9/11 was an inside job", but that is only half-true. In reality, 9/11 seems very likely to have been carried out by al-queda, but that network is really just a part of the United States intelligence apparatus and shadow government.



The family members have serious questions. So does the general public. We have seen our lives reshaped by this horrific event, and we wish to have full disclosure of all truths relating to the 9/11 attacks.



Mr. Cuozzo seems to have been implicating "9/11 Truthers" with selling merchandise at ground zero. I am fairly certain that no 9/11 activists are attempting to capilalize on the deaths of others. A retraction must be forthcoming in order to clarify this situation for the public, and most importantly, for your staff - so that they may be educated.



Instead, 9/11 Truth activists generally hold signs, hand out free DVDs (approved by the publishers of the films) and talk respectfully with passers by and critics of free-speech. Although, I have heard that occasional arguments do take place with defenders of the official myth, but alas that is the nature of free-speech. Everyone is welcome to disagree.



It sounds as if Mr. Cuozzo is concerned that the fallen will be disgraced by some of the visitors at Ground Zero. But if there are important questions still lingering in the minds of the public, and no one demands a new investigation and spreads the truth of those events, then I contend that silence is betrayal of those who were sacrificed on 9/11/2001.



At this time, your esteemed newspaper is helping to maintain that silence, instead of remaining open to the possibility that the men and women who advocate at ground zero might truly be honoring the victims more thoroughly than has happened to date.



The way to honor our fallen heroes is to never obstruct investigators or activists in spreading the information they have uncovered.



There is a pleathora of information about 9/11 that is both varifiable, and absolutely contradicts the official story.



If you are willing to peer into the looking glass, you will discover the truth of the matter.



The choice is yours,



Sincerely,



-Ryan

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chris Sarns
Member Avatar

Well done Ryan

I sent him this:

Those of us who have taken the time to look at the evidence have a first amendment right to say what we think.

You, in turn, have a right to call us anything you like, but do NOT stomp on our right to SPEAK !

Please take 2 minutes and view this video about WTC 7

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003&q=this+is+an+orange&total=2271&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Do you have the courage to look at the evidence objectively?

Sincerely

Chris Sarns
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
« Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic »
Add Reply