| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Just to make you aware; Hani Hanjour Reloaded | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 21 2008, 05:32 PM (3,939 Views) | |
| NK-44 | Jan 21 2008, 05:32 PM Post #1 |
|
Hani Hanjour reloaded This is in essential a repost from the old forum. I added some parts to the 'Maneuver'-section. More statements by pilots confirming the difficulty of the performed maneuver, and that it requires advanced skills to do so. I have added also some aspects to the section "Let's look into another aspect of the maneuver-scenario", including two new sub-sections: "Was there a fight going on?" and "The conflict of the official account with crash site observations". I also had a look into the claims made by an Al-Qaeda operator, that Hanjour wasn't piloting Flight 77. You could find this at the end of the article in the section "The other dead pilot - or Al-Qaida's debunking attempt." Changes have been made in the section about Hanjour's flying skills mainly on those two entries (and the summary): June/Juli 2001 - Caldwell Flight Academy Fairfield, New Jersey August 2001 - Congressional Air Charters Gaithersburg, Maryland If you are already convinced that Hanjour wasn't piloting Flight 77, then I highly recommed to spend your time on the second part "The special treament", in particular the sub-section "The living pilots". No changes have been made in part two besides the added section at the end. Broken links and typos will be (hopefully) fixed later Ready for Reload!? update -added two statements of pilots claiming that Hanjour was capable to pilot Flight 77 -added under 'What evidence do we have that Hanjour was even on Flight 77?' a short section: 'Hanjour's relatives also don't think that he was on a suicide mission' -also don't miss this statement I found regarding Raissi:
Evidence? Proof? Yes, sure! Despite two or three, all broken links should work again.
Edited by NK-44, Jan 23 2008, 04:01 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| NK-44 | Jan 22 2008, 01:45 AM Post #2 |
|
Also added stuff to Hanjour's flying skills. See updated entry above. |
![]() |
|
| fortuneteller | Jan 22 2008, 02:11 AM Post #3 |
![]()
|
A recent news media interview with Omar, the son of Osama Bin Laden, revealed the reaction "maybe" when asked if his father was responsible for 911. We need for him to elaborate on that one. It would help prove what so many intelligent people already know-- It's impossible for planes alone to bring down those towers. |
![]() |
|
| dylan avery | Jan 22 2008, 12:03 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Your first post is an awesome one, Seb. Good to see you around.
|
![]() |
|
| NK-44 | Jan 23 2008, 03:59 PM Post #5 |
|
see update above.Thanks man. Seen that the Final is presented on the Film Gala in Berlin. Great! Is there a chance that anyone of you guys will be there? Edited by NK-44, Jan 23 2008, 04:00 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| look-up | Jan 23 2008, 04:05 PM Post #6 |
|
RE: Omar Bin Laden interview... we dont' really know if we heard the whole thing or in its original configuration. |
![]() |
|
| dylan avery | Jan 24 2008, 12:32 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
Unfortunately not.
|
![]() |
|
| Nevermind | Jan 24 2008, 03:43 PM Post #8 |
|
Oh, you didn't know?
|
Moved to Hijackers |
![]() |
|
| Kaiya | Jan 25 2008, 01:17 AM Post #9 |
|
Can you post it somewhere besides the old forum? I am not registered there. Thanks. Kaiya |
![]() |
|
| NK-44 | Jan 26 2008, 11:40 AM Post #10 |
|
Hani Hanjour reloaded |
![]() |
|
| Andoo Inc. | Jan 26 2008, 12:09 PM Post #11 |
|
Sir finds a lot
|
NK 44 could you post it again. I can't seem to figure out how to click |
![]() |
|
| illeagalhunter | Feb 18 2008, 05:59 PM Post #12 |
|
In the FBI time line he has a multitude of flying lessons. |
![]() |
|
| JackD | Jun 27 2008, 12:21 AM Post #13 |
|
Please note that FBI director Robert Mueller admits, embarrassed, that to date no document or paper or outline or plot of the 9/11 attacks has ever been found, either in US or in Afghanistan. This may be one reason why the FBI does not liist Osam Bn laden as "wanted" for 9/11/01 attacks. there have never been any charges filed in any US court of law against any of the suspects or unindicted co-conspirators, even though no one claims that the ENTIRE plot could have been done by the 19 allged, from fundraising to lessons , etc. Think of that. No charges filed in a court of law. (forget gitmo fakery) perhaps the case would not stand? |
![]() |
|
| Shopnut | Jul 29 2008, 10:34 PM Post #14 |
|
A few comments about the Hani Hanjour Reloaded post. A Washington post reporter claims sources say the plane was flown with “extraordinary skill, blah blah blah”, but the sources are never identified. An unidentified source is just as good as no source at all. Anyone (one of those unidentified sources) who describes flight 77 as “virtually a textbook turn and landing” is not so bright. Airliners do not approach and land at the speeds flight 77 was flying. CDR Kolstad is critical of the 9/11 events, but he is so blind that he asks, “Where are the steel engine parts? Where is the steel landing gear?” Has he never surfed the internet or performed the least amount of research? His statements are not credible in the least. CDR Muga’s statements are equally dubious. A high speed stall is not going to occur when the nose is pushed down to lose altitude. I guess he also conveniently forgot that flight crews typically did not resist the hijackers prior to 9/11. |
![]() |
|
| JackD | Aug 1 2008, 02:07 PM Post #15 |
|
for debunking skeptics which planes do you believe were hijacked on 9/11/01? what documented evidence exists that establishes that alleged hijackers were in fact aboard those planes? are the hijacker-pilots, in your view, capable of piloting the planes in the maneuvers described by the radar, video, FDR data, etc? are the hijacker-pilots, in your view, capable of creating all the physical damage effects observed on 9/11, at the WTC site, at the Pentagon, and SHanksville? that's the big question. Edited by JackD, Aug 1 2008, 02:09 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Shopnut | Aug 1 2008, 08:02 PM Post #16 |
|
Sure. Why not? They took control after the aircraft were airborne. Flight 93 crashed into the ground; hard to miss the ground. Flight 77 crashed into the extremely large Pentagon, very hard building to miss. If the hijacker piloting the plane that hit the second tower was a better pilot, then he might have made a center hit instead of the corner. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Hijackers · Next Topic » |









9:09 AM Jul 11