Time to take it to Court

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Time to take it to Court
Topic Started: Jan 20 2008, 10:52 AM (260 Views)
arbor	Jan 20 2008, 10:52 AM Post #1
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	its been more then 6 years since 9-11. years and years of research. isnt it time the 9-11 truth movemant finally bring their theories and accusations before a court of law? what are they waiting for?
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


JFK	Jan 20 2008, 10:57 AM Post #2
Posts: 4,218 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	arbor Jan 20 2008, 10:52 AM its been more then 6 years since 9-11. years and years of research. isnt it time the 9-11 truth movemant finally bring their theories and accusations before a court of law? what are they waiting for? Honest and unbiased justices ?
Posts: 4,218 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


IVXX	Jan 20 2008, 12:12 PM Post #3
MDCCLXXVI Posts: 162 Group: Admins Member #3 Joined: 12/21/07	arbor Jan 20 2008, 10:52 AM its been more then 6 years since 9-11. years and years of research. isnt it time the 9-11 truth movemant finally bring their theories and accusations before a court of law? what are they waiting for? Take a look at all the cases involving 9/11 and their outcomes.



arbor	Jan 21 2008, 08:52 AM Post #4
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	what does that tell you?
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


IVXX	Jan 21 2008, 09:20 AM Post #5
MDCCLXXVI Posts: 162 Group: Admins Member #3 Joined: 12/21/07	arbor Jan 21 2008, 08:52 AM what does that tell you? That any case involving 9/11 can be throwin out of court with 5 simple words. "On Grounds Of National Security." And when I say take a look at all the cases, I mean all the cases. Look into case brought to court by victim's families that never go their day in court. And when they do get to court the government does everything to drag it out. Like this case. Volunteer firefighter’s family to get 9/11 benefit. This man was hailed as a hero and look at how his family was treated. You know what's interesting?? I didn't hear the likes of Mark Roberts jumping up and down screaming "disrespecting the victims" to the government for this hero.



nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 10:08 AM Post #6
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	IVXX Jan 21 2008, 09:20 AM You know what's interesting?? I didn't hear the likes of Mark Roberts jumping up and down screaming "disrespecting the victims" to the government for this hero. Why should he? He's just a tour guide.
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


Stundie	Jan 21 2008, 11:01 AM Post #7
Posts: 890 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 10:08 AM IVXX Jan 21 2008, 09:20 AM You know what's interesting?? I didn't hear the likes of Mark Roberts jumping up and down screaming "disrespecting the victims" to the government for this hero. Why should he? He's just a tour guide. Holy shit...... :o If it's none other than one of my favourite SLC Intellectual Cowards Nicepants!! Welcome to the forum. Nice to see that you are still using the very same tactics and strategy for this forum as you did in the SLC Forum. Why should he?......Well....... Because Roberts is quick to say similar things about CTers who ask questions. So if CTers are disrespecting victims for asking questions about 9/11 (According to Mr Roberts!) then surely he should be just as quick to say the same about the government who are treating the "Volunteer Firefighters family" very badly considering that the Firefighter is a hero? Agree or disagree? It only took the Government 5 years to eventually allow the family of the volunteer firefighter killed at the WTC to receive federal death benefit for doing his job. Is this not disrespectful?? I know you understand how doublethink works, as you suffer from it, but what about double standards?? Please answer the all points and questions raised instead of ducking out of the tricker points as you usually do. Cheers Stundie
Posts: 890 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08


IVXX	Jan 21 2008, 11:06 AM Post #8
MDCCLXXVI Posts: 162 Group: Admins Member #3 Joined: 12/21/07	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 10:08 AM IVXX Jan 21 2008, 09:20 AM You know what's interesting?? I didn't hear the likes of Mark Roberts jumping up and down screaming "disrespecting the victims" to the government for this hero. Why should he? He's just a tour guide. Why not?? If we speak our views he does.



dylan avery	Jan 21 2008, 11:12 AM Post #9
Posts: 108 Group: Admins Member #2 Joined: 12/21/07	arbor Jan 20 2008, 10:52 AM its been more then 6 years since 9-11. years and years of research. isnt it time the 9-11 truth movemant finally bring their theories and accusations before a court of law? what are they waiting for? Do you know a Judge that would actually prosecute this case? Or do you just like posting open-ended, facetious questions that are, in all honesty, a passive aggressive insult instead of a honest question? The ISI connection is not a theory or an accusation. It's a fact that no United States Court would dare pursue. Edited by dylan avery, Jan 21 2008, 11:15 AM.
Posts: 108 Group: Admins Member #2 Joined: 12/21/07


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 12:30 PM Post #10
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Stundie Jan 21 2008, 11:01 AM Cheers Stundie Stundie nicepants Jan 21 2008, 10:08 AM IVXX Jan 21 2008, 09:20 AM You know what's interesting?? I didn't hear the likes of Mark Roberts jumping up and down screaming "disrespecting the victims" to the government for this hero. Why should he? He's just a tour guide. Holy shit...... :o If it's none other than one of my favourite SLC Intellectual Cowards Nicepants!! Welcome to the forum. Nice to see that you are still using the very same tactics and strategy for this forum as you did in the SLC Forum. Why should he?......Well....... Because Roberts is quick to say similar things about CTers who ask questions. So if CTers are disrespecting victims for asking questions about 9/11 (According to Mr Roberts!) then surely he should be just as quick to say the same about the government who are treating the "Volunteer Firefighters family" very badly considering that the Firefighter is a hero? Agree or disagree? Where did Roberts say "Cters are disrespecting victims for asking questions about 9/11"? While I feel what the government was doing to this victim's family is wrong, I don't believe that Mr. Roberts had any proclivity to speak out publicly on the subject any more than he would about any other 911 victim being treated badly. The reason he has spoken out about that effect of the Conspiracy Theories is because that's what he deals with, and the effect on victims families is one facet of the conspiracy theories. Stundie It only took the Government 5 years to eventually allow the family of the volunteer firefighter killed at the WTC to receive federal death benefit for doing his job. Is this not disrespectful?? Disrespectful? I don't know. Too slow? Probably. But that's our government for you. Again, Mr. Roberts is not some sort of 9/11 Victim Activist, so he has no proclivity to make public statements every time he believes that a 911 victim is being mistreated. Stundie but what about double standards?? Mr. Roberts deals specifically with the conspiracy theories, and therefore has made statements about the effect on victims families of said theories. I am not specifically aware of any other public statements he has made on any other matters dealing with 911 victims families, but as I have said above, he is not a 9/11 victim activist, so there's no reason to expect him to make such statements any time a 911 victim is mis-treated by anyone. Stundie Please answer the all points and questions raised instead of ducking out of the tricker points as you usually do. Right back at ya.
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


defaultdotxbe	Jan 21 2008, 05:04 PM Post #11
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08	dylan avery Jan 21 2008, 11:12 AM arbor Jan 20 2008, 10:52 AM its been more then 6 years since 9-11. years and years of research. isnt it time the 9-11 truth movemant finally bring their theories and accusations before a court of law? what are they waiting for? Do you know a Judge that would actually prosecute this case? Or do you just like posting open-ended, facetious questions that are, in all honesty, a passive aggressive insult instead of a honest question? The ISI connection is not a theory or an accusation. It's a fact that no United States Court would dare pursue. have you tried? or is it just assumption that it would be thrown out? and if it it does get thrown out, try again, and again, and again, for years ive been told the truth movement has so much public support it cant be ignored, and yet i never anyone utilizing this clout and i have one more question, if cases are being thrown out, is it possible this is due to lack of evidence rather than conspiracy?
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08


IVXX	Jan 21 2008, 06:37 PM Post #12
MDCCLXXVI Posts: 162 Group: Admins Member #3 Joined: 12/21/07	defaultdotxbe Jan 21 2008, 05:04 PM and i have one more question, if cases are being thrown out, is it possible this is due to lack of evidence rather than conspiracy? No. they're throwin out of court on grounds of National Security. You take that to mean whatever you want. Actually we can't even say throwin out of court for all of them since a lot of them never got there day in court.



IVXX	Jan 21 2008, 06:38 PM Post #13
MDCCLXXVI Posts: 162 Group: Admins Member #3 Joined: 12/21/07	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 12:30 PM Where did Roberts say "Cters are disrespecting victims for asking questions about 9/11"? So you're down to playing stupid now nicepants?? or is it just defend Roberts to no end even when wrong??



defaultdotxbe	Jan 21 2008, 06:50 PM Post #14
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08	IVXX Jan 21 2008, 06:37 PM defaultdotxbe Jan 21 2008, 05:04 PM and i have one more question, if cases are being thrown out, is it possible this is due to lack of evidence rather than conspiracy? No. they're throwin out of court on grounds of National Security. You take that to mean whatever you want. Actually we can't even say throwin out of court for all of them since a lot of them never got there day in court. the only cases i know of were civil cases, have any criminal charges been filed and summarily dismissed?
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08


IVXX	Jan 21 2008, 06:52 PM Post #15
MDCCLXXVI Posts: 162 Group: Admins Member #3 Joined: 12/21/07	defaultdotxbe Jan 21 2008, 06:50 PM the only cases i know of were civil cases, have any criminal charges been filed and summarily dismissed? Yeah there has. Keep looking.



Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 07:09 PM Post #16
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Why do "skeptics" spend all their energy telling us what we should or should have done. If we are crazy, why do they spend so much time convincing themselves we're nuts?
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


defaultdotxbe	Jan 21 2008, 07:13 PM Post #17
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08	IVXX Jan 21 2008, 06:52 PM defaultdotxbe Jan 21 2008, 06:50 PM the only cases i know of were civil cases, have any criminal charges been filed and summarily dismissed? Yeah there has. Keep looking. helpful as ever
Posts: 91 Group: Members Member #49 Joined: 01/15/08


Kaiya	Jan 21 2008, 07:41 PM Post #18
Posts: 147 Group: BANNED! Member #104 Joined: 01/17/08	IVXX Jan 21 2008, 06:52 PM defaultdotxbe Jan 21 2008, 06:50 PM the only cases i know of were civil cases, have any criminal charges been filed and summarily dismissed? Yeah there has. Keep looking. Which case did you believe had the greatest chance of conviction at trial had it not been dismissed? Thanks. Kaiya Edited to add: As far as I know, there have only been two indictments. Zacarias Moussaoui (USA) and Mounir el-Motassadeq (Germany). Without an indictment, there really is no case. Can you name any other criminal indictments? Edited by Kaiya, Jan 21 2008, 10:52 PM.
Posts: 147 Group: BANNED! Member #104 Joined: 01/17/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »