| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Who's Involved? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Aug 3 2008, 03:41 PM (1,319 Views) | |
| Bitterman | Aug 20 2008, 12:17 PM Post #101 |
|
Sorry Uruk, do you actually think there were WMD's in Iraq? You know they were absolutely certain that Saddam DID have them......and now we know they lied about that knowledge. Did they find OBL? Nah.......most wanted list not updated to show the attacks on the WTC by OBL.....but yeah......they "probably" didn't lie about it...... They offical story is "close enough" enough for you right? So go back to bed. |
 |
 
|
| uruk | Aug 20 2008, 07:46 PM Post #102 |
|
Suit yourself. |
|
|
|
| uruk | Aug 20 2008, 08:02 PM Post #103 |
|
I don't think Saddam had WMDs. I think we are in Iraq for mistaken and false reasons. I don't like the Bush administration any more than anyone here. No, wait, I take that back, there are probably others here who hate the Bush administration more than I do. I don't think everyone involved lied about thinking Sadam had WMDs. Saddam certainly gassed those Gypsies. Where did he get the poison gas? I think key people ignored intelligence reports in favor of thier own mistaken beliefs and agendas. I don't think Bush is a conspirator. In fact I don't think he smart enough to be one. He's just an idiot with too much power. As far as OBL goes. There are a lot of people in the US that are on the most wanted list. They can't even find those people in our own country. Why do think it would be easier for them to find someone hiding in mountainous regions in a country where we have no diplomatic relations? No investigation into these kind of events is going to be a 100% accurate. There are too many variables and chaotic events. And some of it has to rely on human memory which is not very accurate at all. Edited by uruk, Aug 20 2008, 08:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic » |
12:00 PM Nov 23