| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| We can all go back to sleep. The NAU isn't real; Snopes says so | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 19 2008, 04:43 PM (684 Views) | |
| IVXX | Jan 19 2008, 04:43 PM Post #1 |
![]()
MDCCLXXVI
|
Came across this. http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/nau.asp Snopes says the NAU isn't real. We can all go back to sleep now. I love how they cling on to the 2010 date. This date has been mentioned as an ideal date of the NAU but was never nailed down as "the date it would be begin." They site no source at all to back up their claim. They do link to the SPP but do not use it as a source for the claim. Besides can we take the word of the SPP as to what the SPP is doing?? They did miss one little thing in the post. They mention Building a North American Community published by the CFR in association with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asunots Internacionales.
Snopes claim the NAU is false but the last paragraph of the page states....
So Snopes isn't really claiming the NAU is false. They claim that no official government plan is underway to make it happen by 2010. Well thanks Snopes. No one I know is claiming the NAU will be in full swing by 2010. Glad your last paragraph states that you do believe in the move for a NAU. Someone needs to tell Snopes to look into the Trans-Texas Corridor. How Texas is planning to buy or just take the land that the Corridor will go through. |
![]() |
|
| Sureshot | Jan 19 2008, 11:03 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Your glorious Loose Change Forum dictator...
|
Thank god. And while we're at it, 9/11 wasn't an inside job: http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm Phew.
|
![]() |
|
| IVXX | Jan 20 2008, 12:21 AM Post #3 |
![]()
MDCCLXXVI
|
I found it funny how at the end they just say the date of 2010 is false and that in the future a move towards a NAU is possible. |
![]() |
|
| Shopnut | Jul 30 2008, 09:04 PM Post #4 |
|
I'll go with Snopes on this one. |
![]() |
|
| Alexandra | Aug 20 2008, 10:43 PM Post #5 |
|
Snopes is just there to keep the sheeple in line and thinking happy thoughts, IMO. |
![]() |
|
| Flippy | Aug 21 2008, 11:45 AM Post #6 |
|
Yeah we wouldn't do anything like that. I mean providing Mexico with our natural resources... That's crazy talk. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/08/20/state/n002244D08.DTL&tsp=1
Edited by Flippy, Aug 21 2008, 11:46 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · New World Order · Next Topic » |








1:06 PM Nov 30