Bodies and dead people

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Bodies and dead people
Topic Started: Aug 1 2008, 02:41 PM (584 Views)
roundhead	Aug 1 2008, 02:41 PM Post #1
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08	The official Govt spewage tells us that 4 large jetlines went down on 9/11. There were, according to reports, a seemingly small amount of passengers on these planes. I have come to the conclusion that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. I have also come to the conclusion that Flight 93 never went into that small hole in Shanksville either. I have yet to come to a conclusion regarding the two towers being impacted. I lean towards the fact they were, but am far from sure on this. I dont know what camp or group my above thoughts put me in, but it is what i think. My question is this, if, as i believe, at least two flights that day DIDNT crash, where are the people at who SUPPOSEDLY were on those planes. And has anybody in the 9/11 community ever tracked down the passengers, questioned the family members, or anything along this path.I have seen scant coverage of "crash" victims families in print. I have little doubt that whoever was on those "planes"is dead, but where they may have died is something i have always been curious about. This isnt an idle question. Many believe , like me, that at least two planes didnt crash. Where there"supposed"occupants are is something i never hear raised.
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 1 2008, 05:19 PM Post #2
Posts: 1,980 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	i saw photos of human remains at the shanksville site about 3 days ago. i have 3 extremely credible individuals who accompanied me and corroborate this statement. i did not see a large amount of remains by no means. i am not stating that. but i did see a few different photos that appear to be at the crash site and definitely look 100% authentic. no one has to believe me but i think everyone here knows i wouldn't make this up. i will describe the remains in more detail in the immediate future.
Posts: 1,980 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


SPreston	Aug 4 2008, 11:27 AM Post #3
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	roundhead I have little doubt that whoever was on those "planes"is dead, but where they may have died is something i have always been curious about. Flight 77 definitely did not hit the Pentagon nor did any other aircraft. The bodies inside the Pentagon were targeted Pentagon intelligence personnel and $2.3 Trillion auditors who were murdered with pre-planted explosives. So those who were allegedly aboard Flight 77 were disposed of elsewhere. It seems that Flights 11 and 175 were replaced with alternate aircraft carrying much more jet fuel for a much more dramatic Shock & Awe effect at the Twin Towers. So the alleged people who were aboard those two original aircraft were disposed of elsewhere also. As to the manner of disposal, only the 9-11 planners/perpetrators would know for sure. Perhaps some went into the Witness Protection Program with new identities, others perhaps a .22 Quik Shok behind the ear and burial somewhere, or perhaps the aircraft was taken over by remote and the occupants gassed and the entire lot disposed of at sea. Some likely continued on as trustworthy covert agents. There is evidence that Flight 11 never took off from Boston Logan and evidence that Flight 77 did not take off from Washington Dulles. Assuming that Flight 77 did actually take off, it disappeared from radar out near Ohio, and likely landed at an airbase or remote runway where the occupants were disposed of. Flight 77 never returned to Virginia and the decoy aircraft above the Navy Annex and North of the Citgo was a replacement aircraft, apparently with its transponder turned off. There is evidence that several of the aircraft were not removed from the duty rostors of United and American. We will likely never know for certain what happened to the occupants. It is really quite easy to replace an aircraft in full view of ACT radars. A military aircraft with a military call sign flies above an ATC tracked aircraft with a commercial call sign and the two blips on ATC radar merge into one. They turn off their original transponders and turn on their replacement transponders and the aircraft have swapped identities without the ATC knowledge. Then they fly to their new destinations and the occupants are disposed of. It would be even easier with an AWACS with its sophisticated electronic gear assisting. Just inform the crew that it is part of one of the many NORAD/US Air Force drills scheduled by Tricky Dick Cheney for the day of 9-11. Or a military aircraft with transponder off flies above a tracked commercial aircraft with transponder on and the blips on ordinary radar merge. The 2nd aircraft turns its transponder off and flies away, and the 1st aircraft turn its transponder on with the call sign of the 2nd aircraft and now ATC is tracking the 1st aircraft unaware of the swap. The occupants in the 2nd aircraft are flown away for disposal. Even small corporate or military jets could easily be set up to handle the identity swap. Edited by SPreston, Aug 4 2008, 11:34 AM.



Shopnut	Aug 18 2008, 02:05 PM Post #4
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	SPreston Aug 4 2008, 11:27 AM Perhaps some went into the Witness Protection Program with new identities, others perhaps a .22 Quik Shok behind the ear and burial somewhere, or perhaps the aircraft was taken over by remote and the occupants gassed and the entire lot disposed of at sea. Some likely continued on as trustworthy covert agents. There is evidence that Flight 11 never took off from Boston Logan and evidence that Flight 77 did not take off from Washington Dulles. Perhaps some evidence to complement your imagination might make your theories more believable? Got evidence to support your claim these flights did not take off from their respective airports?
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


look-up	Aug 18 2008, 02:12 PM Post #5
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	shopnut, do you know the meaning of the word "perhaps"? it's a suggestion, not a declaration of fact.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


SPreston	Aug 18 2008, 02:12 PM Post #6
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	Shopnut Aug 18 2008, 02:05 PM SPreston Perhaps some went into the Witness Protection Program with new identities, others perhaps a .22 Quik Shok behind the ear and burial somewhere, or perhaps the aircraft was taken over by remote and the occupants gassed and the entire lot disposed of at sea. Some likely continued on as trustworthy covert agents. There is evidence that Flight 11 never took off from Boston Logan and evidence that Flight 77 did not take off from Washington Dulles. Perhaps some evidence to complement your imagination might make your theories more believable? Got evidence to support your claim these flights did not take off from their respective airports? Why don't you get off your dead ass and do your own research? We have gone over this multiple times here and at the old LCs and at P4T. Just because you are so lazy, don't expect me to be your go'fer. If you don't like it, then slither off somewhere else and troll there.



ShaDow	Aug 18 2008, 03:05 PM Post #7
Posts: 104 Group: Members Member #612 Joined: 05/27/08	I don't want this to sound sick, but could I view the human remains at Flight 93's crash site? I didn't see them on the Missouire (spelling..) prosecution. Edited by ShaDow, Aug 18 2008, 03:06 PM.
Posts: 104 Group: Members Member #612 Joined: 05/27/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 18 2008, 03:28 PM Post #8
Posts: 1,980 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	ShaDow Aug 18 2008, 03:05 PM I don't want this to sound sick, but could I view the human remains at Flight 93's crash site? I didn't see them on the Missouire (spelling..) prosecution. no photos of human remains from shanksville were released for the moussaoui trial yet oddly enough pictures of people burned to death inside the pentagon were [i say oddly because moussaoui was supposedly to be on 93 and not 77]. the photos could be obtained through a FOIA. the amount of remains i saw from the site could be attributed to one human being there was so little. wally claims that there are files at an off site location where each passengers identified remains were photographed and attributed to their file. i have no reason to doubt wally but i also have no reason to suspect that any substantial remains were recovered for any passenger. there are a lot of photographs of bone fragments that were taken inside the lab.
Posts: 1,980 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


ShaDow	Aug 18 2008, 03:49 PM Post #9
Posts: 104 Group: Members Member #612 Joined: 05/27/08	Ah right I see.
Posts: 104 Group: Members Member #612 Joined: 05/27/08


Shopnut	Aug 20 2008, 07:49 PM Post #10
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	look-up Aug 18 2008, 02:12 PM shopnut, do you know the meaning of the word "perhaps"? it's a suggestion, not a declaration of fact. I do, that is why I also used the word in my reply. I merely suggested that evidence be shown to support the suggestion.
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


Shopnut	Aug 20 2008, 07:54 PM Post #11
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	SPreston Aug 18 2008, 02:12 PM Why don't you get off your dead ass and do your own research? We have gone over this multiple times here and at the old LCs and at P4T. Just because you are so lazy, don't expect me to be your go'fer. If you don't like it, then slither off somewhere else and troll there. Why the vemon? I thought that you already had the evidence at hand to show to us when you made your claims. I thought it would be a simple matter for you to cut and paste to put it here on the website. If you make a claim but say you have no evidence to support it, then I will not bother to ask.
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Shanksville · Next Topic »