Is the NIST WTC7 report out?

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

Is the NIST WTC7 report out?; wasn't it due out in July?
Topic Started: Jul 30 2008, 04:01 PM (1,256 Views)
catbert	Jul 30 2008, 04:01 PM Post #1
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Hi, just wanted to check if I missed this report, or whether any of you know more about when it will be downloadable. But hey, it's been "due out soon" for the past 4 or 5 years, so.....
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


JFK	Jul 30 2008, 04:46 PM Post #2
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Welcome catbert. Yes I believe you are correct... The "leaked" version is available here - http://www.infowars.net/WTC7Report/ I have not yet searched for the "official" version.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


catbert	Jul 30 2008, 05:33 PM Post #3
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Thanks for the link, but how much credibility would you give to the claim that this is an actual "leak" of the official - and still forthcoming - WTC7 report from NIST? Do we know anything by now about who leaked it, or for what reason it was leaked?
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


JFK	Jul 30 2008, 05:50 PM Post #4
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	catbert Jul 30 2008, 05:33 PM Thanks for the link, but how much credibility would you give to the claim that this is an actual "leak" of the official - and still forthcoming - WTC7 report from NIST? Do we know anything by now about who leaked it, or for what reason it was leaked? You are welcome. I have looked the files over with a hex editor and they appear to be legit... "Appear" being the key word. No word on just how Alex Jones came about aquiring them, but here is the article - http://prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/062508_unusual_event.htm I guess we will just have to wait and see how they compare with the "official" release. Edit to add... Apparently it is not yet released. - http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html Edited by JFK, Jul 30 2008, 05:54 PM.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Miragememories	Jul 31 2008, 10:18 AM Post #5
Posts: 759 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08	I have my suspicions that the 'leaked report' was intentional so that they could use public reaction, or lack of, to determine the final summation to be used. With WTC7, I'm sure NIST fears getting caught in weak conclusions that might get contradicted by overlooked evidence or testimony. MM Edited by Miragememories, Jul 31 2008, 05:42 PM.
Posts: 759 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08


catbert	Jul 31 2008, 07:40 PM Post #6
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Yup, Miragememories, they may indeed be as sly as that. Reflecting on the whole WTC7 report delay scandal, it is abundantly clear that the long delay in itself spells G.U.I.L.T.Y. all over the Government's faces. The problem is that for the media, a scientific report that is NOT coming out, is a non-news story. Even though that is one of the biggest scandals of all. Let's not forget that... From reading other Government reports on the 'Evil Gravity' phenomenons of 9/11, I'd say they'll go for a strategy of "drown everyone in sh*tloads of pages of extreme scientific detail and dryness", where only the literate few will be able to get the point: That they violate some basic mathematical or physical method. For instance, they may start with the observed fact, the 6-7 second collapse, and then go from there... Doing the maths and "finding" that there weren't actually any floors, and walls, any steel or concrete in the building to stop it falling. As a matter of "Bush Fact" (tm), there was no building, just thin air. Bookmakers should open some bets as to what they'll choose this time around, and also WHEN they will deign to publish.
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


Morganti	Aug 1 2008, 04:44 AM Post #7
Posts: 11 Group: Members Member #779 Joined: 08/01/08	With how much they are delaying the release of their final report, we may only get to see it in 2009. Speaks for itself why it is taking so long for them to release their final report.
Posts: 11 Group: Members Member #779 Joined: 08/01/08


illeagalhunter	Aug 1 2008, 02:09 PM Post #8
Posts: 175 Group: Members Member #81 Joined: 01/16/08	The NIST report will say " a big boy did it & ran away "
Posts: 175 Group: Members Member #81 Joined: 01/16/08


catbert	Aug 12 2008, 05:10 PM Post #9
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	illeagalhunter Aug 1 2008, 02:09 PM The NIST report will say " a big boy did it & ran away " Yeah, probably.. So, any news on the comings and goings of this 7-years-in-the-making mock WTC7 report?
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


look-up	Aug 12 2008, 06:07 PM Post #10
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	I think they were expecting full blown martial law by now, and that finishing the report wouldn't matter. I think the NWO plan is a bit behind schedule... we are causing them serious trouble. Keep it up guys/gals!
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


catbert	Aug 12 2008, 09:37 PM Post #11
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Well, in the meantime, maybe I should lecture y'all on the arithmetics of Evil Gravity, over at my Evil Gravity Blog... Chances are these lectures will contain as much substance as the «coming» official NIST report - maybe even more!
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


catbert	Aug 19 2008, 12:54 PM Post #12
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	As stated in another post here: At long last! http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/calmed/wtc_081808.html «The Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will hold a media briefing and live public webcast on Aug. 21, 2008, in Gaithersburg, Md., on the findings and recommendations from its building and fire safety investigation of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). WTC 7 was a 47-story building that fell nearly seven hours after the World Trade Center (WTC) towers collapsed following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.» This better be good!
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


look-up	Aug 19 2008, 04:05 PM Post #13
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	catbert Aug 19 2008, 12:54 PM This better be good! oh, it will be entertaining, to say the least.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


SPreston	Aug 19 2008, 04:53 PM Post #14
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	look-up I think they were expecting full blown martial law by now, and that finishing the report wouldn't matter. I think the NWO plan is a bit behind schedule... we are causing them serious trouble. Keep it up guys/gals! I am surprised the 'government loyalists' and 'pseudoskeptics' let you get away with that blatant statement. Perhaps the truth and the sorry state of the American people is slowly dawning on them.



Miragememories	Aug 19 2008, 06:19 PM Post #15
Posts: 759 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08	Regretfully, I expect it to be an extremely boring rehash. The message has remained loud and clear that NIST has no expectation of straying from it's original hypothesis, which was likely formed sometime in the Fall of 2001 and anchored in a belief that the sole cause was impact and fire damage. Their webcast public release on Aug.21, 2008, will likely be little more than a "coming out party" for their latest publishing efforts. NIST has found it much easier, cheaper, and requires far less courage, to theorize the cause of the collapse based on "leftover guesses". They have zero motivation to support a politically unpopular demolition theory. The problem was, and still is, NIST's inability to make their best guess theory "hold water". The political fallout, if NIST were to release a controversial report, would be terrifying to the conservative crowd administrating NIST's affairs. With Bush on the way out, no doubt, those in NIST who placed their seal of approval on this Official Guess, have envisioned the horrifying scenario of being placed under the big spotlight of a new administration's investigative team. MM Edited by Miragememories, Aug 20 2008, 10:20 AM.
Posts: 759 Group: Members Member #40 Joined: 01/15/08


Tim Riches	Aug 21 2008, 01:23 PM Post #16
Posts: 350 Group: Members Member #193 Joined: 01/23/08	Seems it's now out. The CBC website is just reporting it, and there is a debate in the comments section below the story which is starting to get lively. You need to register to comment, but no registration is required to "recommend" the comments you favor, achieved by clicking on the 'recommend' button below the comment. Would be a great opportunity to boost certain comments to the top, as most people will sort them by 'most recommended' to avoid the chaff. http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/08/21/wtc-fires.html
Posts: 350 Group: Members Member #193 Joined: 01/23/08


catbert	Aug 21 2008, 03:15 PM Post #17
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Any links to a post-happening download or torrent of the AE911truth.org press conference & analysis?
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


CB_Brooklyn	Aug 21 2008, 05:19 PM Post #18
Posts: 12 Group: Members Member #472 Joined: 04/06/08	WTC 7 is a PSYOPS designed to distract us from directed energy weapons. WHY ELSE would Silverstein say he "pulled it"?? WHY ELSE would PBS broadcast Silverstein saying he "pulled it"??? PROOF OF INSIDE JOB Magnetometer data from alaska.edu shows the earth's magnetic field shifted with every 9/11 "event". The World Trade Center was destroyed with directed energy weapons. See this analysis by former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood for info on the magnetometer data: http://drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html Edited by CB_Brooklyn, Aug 21 2008, 05:19 PM.
Posts: 12 Group: Members Member #472 Joined: 04/06/08


Gideon524	Aug 21 2008, 05:42 PM Post #19
Oh, you didn't know? Posts: 521 Group: Admins Member #4 Joined: 12/21/07	CB_Brooklyn Aug 21 2008, 05:19 PM WTC 7 is a PSYOPS designed to distract us from directed energy weapons. WHY ELSE would Silverstein say he "pulled it"?? WHY ELSE would PBS broadcast Silverstein saying he "pulled it"??? PROOF OF INSIDE JOB Magnetometer data from alaska.edu shows the earth's magnetic field shifted with every 9/11 "event". The World Trade Center was destroyed with directed energy weapons. See this analysis by former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood for info on the magnetometer data: http://drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html Are you fucking kidding me? This is your first and only warning about posting space beam/energy weapon nonsense. Edited by Gideon524, Aug 21 2008, 06:37 PM.



catbert	Aug 21 2008, 05:43 PM Post #20
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Of course she is... Why is she even on this forum?
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


mynameis	Aug 21 2008, 06:17 PM Post #21
Internet Jujitsu Posts: 1,567 Group: Members Member #50 Joined: 01/15/08	Never yell "FIRE!" in a crowded gubermint building it might collapse out of sheer terror. Edited by mynameis, Aug 21 2008, 06:17 PM.



Bitterman	Aug 21 2008, 11:45 PM Post #22
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08	Did anyone catch this? NIST released this as of today.....I may be late here....sorry if I am. http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc082108.html They talk about something new apparently, something about Thermal Expansion, I dunno just yet I'm reading through it now.
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08


Paddy	Aug 22 2008, 09:11 AM Post #23
Posts: 2 Group: Members Member #144 Joined: 01/20/08	Has anyone forwarded NIST's findings to Danny Jowenko? I'd like to hear what he has to say about it after reading the report and watching the videos.
Posts: 2 Group: Members Member #144 Joined: 01/20/08


Citizen Pawn	Aug 23 2008, 05:30 AM Post #24
Posts: 601 Group: Members Member #202 Joined: 01/24/08	SO I guess it was "Fire" after all. I'm so relieved now. I thought it was fuel tanks or 'gouges' or "Raging Infernos" and sheer weakening from "another building falling on it" (Snicker) But now I see....it was just fire. Cool So I guess this totally revolutionizes the way fireproofing and building codes are observed? And this would have nothing to do with the fact that NIST is also studying "Super Alloys" and how they can help in retrofitting buildings. Nahhhhh, that wouldn't be a conflict of interest or anything. Move along now people. Nothing to see here. Fire is it.
Posts: 601 Group: Members Member #202 Joined: 01/24/08


catbert	Aug 23 2008, 07:46 AM Post #25
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08	Here is the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) press conference with Richard Gage going through the new NIST report release about World Trade Center 7 (WTC7): http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20080822234358760 http://www.ae911truth.org/audio/AE911truth%20News%20Conf%20080821_web.mp3 Does anyone know if there will also be a video version of this?
Posts: 27 Group: Members Member #745 Joined: 07/18/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · WTC 7 · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2