Open Challenge to Skeptics

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

Open Challenge to Skeptics; Recorded phone debate
Topic Started: Jan 18 2008, 07:43 PM (646 Views)
nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 11:51 AM Post #26
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Lin Kuei Jan 21 2008, 11:37 AM nicepants Jan 20 2008, 03:52 AM Give us your theory for what happened on 9/11 and I bet we'll find about 100x more "anomalies". who cares for theories about what happened? I thought that was the whole point, unless I missed something.
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


Lin Kuei	Jan 21 2008, 12:49 PM Post #27
Posts: 1,309 Group: Admins Member #5 Joined: 12/22/07	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 11:51 AM unless I missed something. evidently
Posts: 1,309 Group: Admins Member #5 Joined: 12/22/07


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 01:18 PM Post #28
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Lin Kuei Jan 21 2008, 12:49 PM nicepants Jan 21 2008, 11:51 AM unless I missed something. evidently Evidently I missed when people (or at least you) stopped caring about what happened. "who cares for theories about what happened?"
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Post #29
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	TruthSquad Jan 19 2008, 04:14 PM Quote: Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 19 2008, 11:50 AM Exactly. They are cowards- all of them. They live to needlessly cast doubt, ignore, ridicule, distract, omit, skirt around issues, ignore evidence, play circular word games. Mark Roberts uses the ignore and ridicule tactics predominantly. We're here if anyone wants to step up and get some. Thanks for pointing that out though, IVXX. Sometimes I just expect too much of people. How laughable ! Aldo, are you a hero because you use your real name? I am a coward because I don't? Well that is only one of the reasons I am a hero. haha. You are a coward for than that reason, though. Like, you're a coward for not going to Lagasse and brooks and telling them they didn't see the plane on the north side and that they need to retract their statements. Quote: Skeptics like myself are cowards for what?? Ignoring evidence?? Omit?? skirts around issues???? ect. Hello Pot.... Meet Kettle!! Quote: Aldo, was Craig drinking with Rob from PFT the night Rob made one of his death threats to Mark Roberts? One? I don't know of any. If he made a "death threat" why didn't Mark the Narc go to the police, like he did with Jackchit? Aahhh, that's right, because Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution. Mark Roberts IS an enemy of the United States, he is a domestic enemy. We have evidence and he (along with many others) is obstructing justice, which is jeopardizing the safety of our country. Quote: Sorry, I am not hiding behind anything. I choose not to reveal my name ANYWHERE on the internet. I prefer to keep me and my family safe. Blah, blah, blah. Quote: Aldo, if you and Craig are ever at a truther conference in Boston, please let me know. I would be more than happy to sit down and have a beer with you guys. (in a public place) I wouldn't waste your time or ours like that.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Post #30
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 19 2008, 06:49 PM i really dont think a fair and intellectually sound debate is even possible. no one can agree on reliable sources. no one can agree on reliable qualifications for "evidence". one man's witness is another man's liar or paid agent. one man's expert is another man's lunatic or shill. in the end, its all just a pissing contest, and no one is listening. =) Arbor, Have a look at the evidence PFT and CIT have obtained first.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 02:41 PM Post #31
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution. How, exactly, was this promise phrased?
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 04:00 PM Post #32
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 02:41 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution. How, exactly, was this promise phrased? I don't know, how was it phrased? Nicepants, Are you American? Do you consider yourself a patriot or a traitor to your country?
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 04:01 PM Post #33
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Nicepants, Would you like to become involved in a recorded phone debate or discussion?
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 04:19 PM Post #34
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 04:00 PM nicepants Jan 21 2008, 02:41 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution. How, exactly, was this promise phrased? I don't know, how was it phrased? Nicepants, Are you American? Do you consider yourself a patriot or a traitor to your country? I am no traitor, but I do not feel that I am worthy of the title of a patriot. Please answer my question. "How, exactly, was this promise phrased?"
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 04:21 PM Post #35
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 04:01 PM Nicepants, Would you like to become involved in a recorded phone debate or discussion? Perhaps, as long as I know the topics to be covered.
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 06:59 PM Post #36
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 04:21 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 04:01 PM Nicepants, Would you like to become involved in a recorded phone debate or discussion? Perhaps, as long as I know the topics to be covered. It would be on the Pentagon attack.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 21 2008, 07:05 PM Post #37
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	nicepants Jan 21 2008, 04:19 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 04:00 PM nicepants Jan 21 2008, 02:41 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution. How, exactly, was this promise phrased? I don't know, how was it phrased? Nicepants, Are you American? Do you consider yourself a patriot or a traitor to your country? I am no traitor, but I do not feel that I am worthy of the title of a patriot. Please answer my question. "How, exactly, was this promise phrased?" I told you I don't know. But I know a death threat requires a person to make an actual death threat. Do you have a copy of it? If it was a death threat, why didn't Mark Roberts pursue it legally? Do we currently have a "death threat" against Osama Bin Laden? Did we have one against Saddam. What about Al Quaeda, do we have an ongoing death threath going against them? You are no patriot. Mark Roberts IS guilty of obstruction of justice, as are you. Mark Roberts and yourself, are traitors to this country. You are both guilty of endangering our country and the constitution of the United States. Justice should be swift and final. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Jan 21 2008, 07:06 PM.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 07:42 PM Post #38
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 07:05 PM nicepants Jan 21 2008, 04:19 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 04:00 PM nicepants Jan 21 2008, 02:41 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 02:19 PM Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution. How, exactly, was this promise phrased? I don't know, how was it phrased? Nicepants, Are you American? Do you consider yourself a patriot or a traitor to your country? I am no traitor, but I do not feel that I am worthy of the title of a patriot. Please answer my question. "How, exactly, was this promise phrased?" I told you I don't know. But I know a death threat requires a person to make an actual death threat. Do you have a copy of it? If it was a death threat, why didn't Mark Roberts pursue it legally? Do we currently have a "death threat" against Osama Bin Laden? Did we have one against Saddam. What about Al Quaeda, do we have an ongoing death threath going against them? You are no patriot. Mark Roberts IS guilty of obstruction of justice, as are you. Mark Roberts and yourself, are traitors to this country. You are both guilty of endangering our country and the constitution of the United States. Justice should be swift and final. If you do not know what was said, then how can you possibly know that: "Rob did not make a death threat. He made a promise to uphold the constitution."
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


nicepants	Jan 21 2008, 07:44 PM Post #39
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 06:59 PM nicepants Jan 21 2008, 04:21 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 21 2008, 04:01 PM Nicepants,<br /><br />Would you like to become involved in a recorded phone debate or discussion? Perhaps, as long as I know the topics to be covered. It would be on the Pentagon attack. Will this be vs You or Craig? Edited by nicepants, Jan 22 2008, 12:04 PM.
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


nicepants	Jan 22 2008, 12:04 PM Post #40
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Anyone? Buheler? Who will be debating me?
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


noeffects	Jan 22 2008, 12:32 PM Post #41
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	You want a debate Mr. Nicepants. Show how nice your pants are. We can debate the niceness of your pants or even debate the fact they are pants at all. If you think you are able to name yourself Nicepants then show us how nice they are.
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 22 2008, 01:06 PM Post #42
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	nicepants Jan 22 2008, 12:04 PM Anyone? Buheler? Who will be debating me? Well let's set some ground rules before we decide that. Mmkay? There has to be a concession by the end of the phone call. Either you concede something or we concede something. You must use your first and last name and you must prove your identity to us. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Jan 22 2008, 01:07 PM.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


nicepants	Jan 22 2008, 01:56 PM Post #43
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 22 2008, 01:06 PM nicepants Jan 22 2008, 12:04 PM Anyone? Buheler? Who will be debating me? Well let's set some ground rules before we decide that. Mmkay? There has to be a concession by the end of the phone call. Either you concede something or we concede something. You must use your first and last name and you must prove your identity to us. what, specifically do you require as proof of my identity? (With the understanding that if it's expected of me, it will likewise be expected of my opponent)
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


Gideon524	Jan 22 2008, 02:55 PM Post #44
Oh, you didn't know? Posts: 520 Group: Admins Member #4 Joined: 12/21/07	noeffects Jan 22 2008, 12:32 PM You want a debate Mr. Nicepants. Show how nice your pants are. We can debate the niceness of your pants or even debate the fact they are pants at all. If you think you are able to name yourself Nicepants then show us how nice they are. You chose the perfect name, noeffects, because your cute little comments here and there have no effect on debunking the evidence people like you and the JFERs constantly piss on. Keep acting like a 2nd grader and you'll be shown the door.



Aldo Marquis CIT	Jan 22 2008, 02:56 PM Post #45
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	nicepants Jan 22 2008, 01:56 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 22 2008, 01:06 PM nicepants Jan 22 2008, 12:04 PM Anyone? Buheler? Who will be debating me? Well let's set some ground rules before we decide that. Mmkay? There has to be a concession by the end of the phone call. Either you concede something or we concede something. You must use your first and last name and you must prove your identity to us. what, specifically do you require as proof of my identity? (With the understanding that if it's expected of me, it will likewise be expected of my opponent) ID/DL and of course, but you already know who we are. Or are you more comfortable with us just knowing your name and accepting it at face value? Are you willing to concede within the debate?
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


nicepants	Jan 22 2008, 03:14 PM Post #46
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 22 2008, 02:56 PM nicepants Jan 22 2008, 01:56 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 22 2008, 01:06 PM nicepants Jan 22 2008, 12:04 PM Anyone? Buheler? Who will be debating me? Well let's set some ground rules before we decide that. Mmkay? There has to be a concession by the end of the phone call. Either you concede something or we concede something. You must use your first and last name and you must prove your identity to us. what, specifically do you require as proof of my identity? (With the understanding that if it's expected of me, it will likewise be expected of my opponent) ID/DL and of course, but you already know who we are. Or are you more comfortable with us just knowing your name and accepting it at face value? Are you willing to concede within the debate? I will not be providing you with a copy of my DL. You can either accept my name at face value or not, it is your choice and bears no consequence on the data to be presented. As with any debate, I am willing to concede within the debate provided that there are points I hold which you show to be incorrect. I presume you agree to concede as well?
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


nicepants	Jan 28 2008, 02:16 PM Post #47
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08	For the record, I'm willing to do a recorded phone debate with one of the CIT guys, but as of yet they have refused to make any arrangements.
Posts: 303 Group: BANNED! Member #59 Joined: 01/15/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2