Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
BBC Planning a follow-up to 911 Documentary
Topic Started: Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM (329 Views)
TruthSquad

This BBC documentary will possibly feature a debate between a well known truther and Mark Roberts. To date, there has been zero success in finding someone notable to debate Mark Roberts. Dylan and Jason have refused to debate him again. All but Jim Fetzer have refused. This is a great way for the truth movement to have international exposure.

The debate will be in New York on a show called Hardfire and filmed by the BBC. If you are interested, you can Google "hardfire debate" to see other 911 debates.

I encourage anyone that has close contacts with those like Kevin Ryan, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dr. Griffin, Mr. Gage, etc... Have them step up and answer the call to show what the truth really is!!




http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103864 This thread will direct you to the gentleman that will be holding the debate.

Edited by TruthSquad, Jan 18 2008, 11:29 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

TruthSquad
Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM
This BBC documentary will possibly feature a debate between a well known truther and Mark Roberts. To date, there has been zero success in finding someone notable to debate Mark Roberts. Dylan and Jason have refused to debate him again. All but Jim Fetzer have refused. This is a great way for the truth movement to have international exposure.

The debate will be in New York on a show called Hardfire and filmed by the BBC. If you are interested, you can Google "hardfire debate" to see other 911 debates.

I encourage anyone that has close contacts with those like Kevin Ryan, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dr. Griffin, Mr. Gage, etc... Have them step up and answer the call to show what the truth really is!!




http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103864 This thread will direct you to the gentleman that will be holding the debate.

I'm sure it will be fair and balanced, track record not so great.
It seems after reading Ron's creepy comments about Roberts, that old Ronny has Roberts testicles firmly back on his chin.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miragememories
Member Avatar

For a start I would like to see evidence that the BBC have any interest in covering anything presented by HardFire.

Ron Weick (Pomeroo on JREF) plays fast and loose with the truth and will do almost anything to attract guests to his propaganda show.

He also rides shotgun for Mark Roberts, changing the subject when the going gets rough, steering subjects to Roberts areas of preparation and joining Roberts in the assault when needed. He is anything but a true host and moderator and only a fool would appear in front of a camera with him in control.

I'd rather have O'Reilly shave me with a dull razor.

MM
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 19 2008, 05:59 AM
TruthSquad
Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM
This BBC documentary will possibly feature a debate between a well known truther and Mark Roberts. To date, there has been zero success in finding someone notable to debate Mark Roberts. Dylan and Jason have refused to debate him again. All but Jim Fetzer have refused. This is a great way for the truth movement to have international exposure.

The debate will be in New York on a show called Hardfire and filmed by the BBC. If you are interested, you can Google "hardfire debate" to see other 911 debates.

I encourage anyone that has close contacts with those like Kevin Ryan, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dr. Griffin, Mr. Gage, etc... Have them step up and answer the call to show what the truth really is!!




http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103864 This thread will direct you to the gentleman that will be holding the debate.

I'm sure it will be fair and balanced, track record not so great.
It seems after reading Ron's creepy comments about Roberts, that old Ronny has Roberts testicles firmly back on his chin.
The debate with Dylan & Jason seemed pretty fair.

I'd rather see them debate a well-known member of the movement than someone like Fetzer again. That was a mess.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
illeagalhunter
Member Avatar

Why debate Roberts again , hi head is too far up his own ass. Let the evidence speak volumes, no need for debate.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?

People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?

People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

nicepants
Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
jackchit
Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?

People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber.
what a joke those 2 are
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
nicepants
Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
jackchit
Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?

People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber.
what a joke those 2 are
So you've told who it shouldn't be. Who should it be? (I mean on both sides)

If Roberts is as dumb as you assert, he should be a very easy opponent.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

How about this guy ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K58Cenb7OHM

:P
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

nicepants
Jan 20 2008, 09:52 AM
jackchit
Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
nicepants
Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
jackchit
Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?

People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber.
what a joke those 2 are
So you've told who it shouldn't be. Who should it be? (I mean on both sides)

If Roberts is as dumb as you assert, he should be a very easy opponent.

Roberts isn't qualified to debate this issue that's clear.
If I had a problem with my electrics i wouldn't ask the local toilet cleaner for advice its common sense.
Why do you need people to debate this? are you incapable of thinking for yourself?
If you choose to believe the official account then thats between you and your concience.
Week is insane as also i believe is Roberts, after all Roberts does have a family history of mental illness his mother topped herself didn't she?
I'd say that gives us an insight into how Mr Roberts mind has been affected by this tragedy, he has no social skills therefore tries to draw attention to himself by being a pain in the arse of anyone who dare think for themselves, its a way of feeling his pointless existance has a purpose. People who listen to his spewings and want to attach themselves to him in any way are only making the problem for him worse.
He cannot begin the road to recovery until he accepts reality, I wish him all the best in his battle with his demons.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 20 2008, 12:17 PM
nicepants
Jan 20 2008, 09:52 AM
jackchit
Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
nicepants
Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
jackchit
Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?

People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber.
what a joke those 2 are
So you've told who it shouldn't be. Who should it be? (I mean on both sides)

If Roberts is as dumb as you assert, he should be a very easy opponent.

Roberts isn't qualified to debate this issue that's clear.
If I had a problem with my electrics i wouldn't ask the local toilet cleaner for advice its common sense.
Why do you need people to debate this? are you incapable of thinking for yourself?
If you choose to believe the official account then thats between you and your concience.
Week is insane as also i believe is Roberts, after all Roberts does have a family history of mental illness his mother topped herself didn't she?
I'd say that gives us an insight into how Mr Roberts mind has been affected by this tragedy, he has no social skills therefore tries to draw attention to himself by being a pain in the arse of anyone who dare think for themselves, its a way of feeling his pointless existance has a purpose. People who listen to his spewings and want to attach themselves to him in any way are only making the problem for him worse.
He cannot begin the road to recovery until he accepts reality, I wish him all the best in his battle with his demons.
Obviously you're no fan of Mr. Roberts...but if he's unqualified, wouldn't that give the TM an advantage in the debate? Wouldn't you WANT to be debating against someone who would be easy to defeat?

If he isn't qualified, who is?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? ;)

I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account.

So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? ;)

I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account.

So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.

how can you debate someone who is mentally ill like roberts.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

jackchit
Jan 20 2008, 06:41 PM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? ;)

I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account.

So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.

how can you debate someone who is mentally ill like roberts.
and the BBC know nothing about this, A little bit of self promotion from roberts and his boyfriend me thinks, again they are devoid of facts.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 20 2008, 06:41 PM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? ;)

I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account.

So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.

how can you debate someone who is mentally ill like roberts.
Do you have a source for that, or is it your own diagnosis?

If he's really that bad, I don't see what you're so scared of.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nolan ganwich
Member Avatar

There is no BBC involvement with Hardfire, the corporation has already had its fingers burnt and will not be rushing into anything "911" for quite some time.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility.
Now please stop pretending it has.
no one cares.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility.
Now please stop pretending it has.
no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire?

Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility.
Now please stop pretending it has.
no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire?

Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it.
we all make mistakes :P
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility.
Now please stop pretending it has.
no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire?

Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it.
we all make mistakes :P
The parties of a debate speak more to the "credibility" than the venue. Perhaps you have an alternate venue & panel in mind?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jackchit
Member Avatar

nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 02:39 PM
jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility.
Now please stop pretending it has.
no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire?

Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it.
we all make mistakes :P
The parties of a debate speak more to the "credibility" than the venue. Perhaps you have an alternate venue & panel in mind?
Yes I do, how about me and you? I'll let you decide the venue.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nicepants

jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 05:56 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 02:39 PM
jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
jackchit
Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
nicepants
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility.
Now please stop pretending it has.
no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire?

Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it.
we all make mistakes :P
The parties of a debate speak more to the "credibility" than the venue. Perhaps you have an alternate venue & panel in mind?
Yes I do, how about me and you? I'll let you decide the venue.
Hardfire. You can make the arrangements.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »
Add Reply