|
BBC Planning a follow-up to 911 Documentary
|
|
Topic Started: Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM (329 Views)
|
|
TruthSquad
|
Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 36
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #119
- Joined:
- 01/18/08
|
This BBC documentary will possibly feature a debate between a well known truther and Mark Roberts. To date, there has been zero success in finding someone notable to debate Mark Roberts. Dylan and Jason have refused to debate him again. All but Jim Fetzer have refused. This is a great way for the truth movement to have international exposure.
The debate will be in New York on a show called Hardfire and filmed by the BBC. If you are interested, you can Google "hardfire debate" to see other 911 debates.
I encourage anyone that has close contacts with those like Kevin Ryan, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dr. Griffin, Mr. Gage, etc... Have them step up and answer the call to show what the truth really is!!
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103864 This thread will direct you to the gentleman that will be holding the debate.
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 19 2008, 05:59 AM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- TruthSquad
- Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM
This BBC documentary will possibly feature a debate between a well known truther and Mark Roberts. To date, there has been zero success in finding someone notable to debate Mark Roberts. Dylan and Jason have refused to debate him again. All but Jim Fetzer have refused. This is a great way for the truth movement to have international exposure. The debate will be in New York on a show called Hardfire and filmed by the BBC. If you are interested, you can Google "hardfire debate" to see other 911 debates. I encourage anyone that has close contacts with those like Kevin Ryan, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dr. Griffin, Mr. Gage, etc... Have them step up and answer the call to show what the truth really is!! http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103864 This thread will direct you to the gentleman that will be holding the debate. I'm sure it will be fair and balanced, track record not so great. It seems after reading Ron's creepy comments about Roberts, that old Ronny has Roberts testicles firmly back on his chin.
|
|
|
| |
|
Miragememories
|
Jan 19 2008, 09:35 AM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 759
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #40
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
For a start I would like to see evidence that the BBC have any interest in covering anything presented by HardFire.
Ron Weick (Pomeroo on JREF) plays fast and loose with the truth and will do almost anything to attract guests to his propaganda show.
He also rides shotgun for Mark Roberts, changing the subject when the going gets rough, steering subjects to Roberts areas of preparation and joining Roberts in the assault when needed. He is anything but a true host and moderator and only a fool would appear in front of a camera with him in control.
I'd rather have O'Reilly shave me with a dull razor.
MM
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 19 2008, 07:42 PM
Post #4
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 19 2008, 05:59 AM
- TruthSquad
- Jan 18 2008, 11:27 AM
This BBC documentary will possibly feature a debate between a well known truther and Mark Roberts. To date, there has been zero success in finding someone notable to debate Mark Roberts. Dylan and Jason have refused to debate him again. All but Jim Fetzer have refused. This is a great way for the truth movement to have international exposure. The debate will be in New York on a show called Hardfire and filmed by the BBC. If you are interested, you can Google "hardfire debate" to see other 911 debates. I encourage anyone that has close contacts with those like Kevin Ryan, Alex Jones, Steven Jones, Dr. Griffin, Mr. Gage, etc... Have them step up and answer the call to show what the truth really is!! http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103864 This thread will direct you to the gentleman that will be holding the debate.
I'm sure it will be fair and balanced, track record not so great. It seems after reading Ron's creepy comments about Roberts, that old Ronny has Roberts testicles firmly back on his chin. The debate with Dylan & Jason seemed pretty fair.
I'd rather see them debate a well-known member of the movement than someone like Fetzer again. That was a mess.
|
|
|
| |
|
illeagalhunter
|
Jan 19 2008, 07:59 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 175
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #81
- Joined:
- 01/16/08
|
Why debate Roberts again , hi head is too far up his own ass. Let the evidence speak volumes, no need for debate.
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Post #6
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?
People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
Post #7
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?
People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'. Who do you think should debate, then?
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
Post #8
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- nicepants
- Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
- jackchit
- Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?
People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then? well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. what a joke those 2 are
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 20 2008, 09:52 AM
Post #9
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
- nicepants
- Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
- jackchit
- Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?
People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. what a joke those 2 are So you've told who it shouldn't be. Who should it be? (I mean on both sides)
If Roberts is as dumb as you assert, he should be a very easy opponent.
|
|
|
| |
|
JFK
|
Jan 20 2008, 10:10 AM
Post #10
|
|
- Posts:
- 4,225
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #108
- Joined:
- 01/17/08
|
How about this guy ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K58Cenb7OHM
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 20 2008, 12:17 PM
Post #11
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- nicepants
- Jan 20 2008, 09:52 AM
- jackchit
- Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
- nicepants
- Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
- jackchit
- Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?
People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. what a joke those 2 are
So you've told who it shouldn't be. Who should it be? (I mean on both sides) If Roberts is as dumb as you assert, he should be a very easy opponent. Roberts isn't qualified to debate this issue that's clear. If I had a problem with my electrics i wouldn't ask the local toilet cleaner for advice its common sense. Why do you need people to debate this? are you incapable of thinking for yourself? If you choose to believe the official account then thats between you and your concience. Week is insane as also i believe is Roberts, after all Roberts does have a family history of mental illness his mother topped herself didn't she? I'd say that gives us an insight into how Mr Roberts mind has been affected by this tragedy, he has no social skills therefore tries to draw attention to himself by being a pain in the arse of anyone who dare think for themselves, its a way of feeling his pointless existance has a purpose. People who listen to his spewings and want to attach themselves to him in any way are only making the problem for him worse. He cannot begin the road to recovery until he accepts reality, I wish him all the best in his battle with his demons.
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 20 2008, 03:23 PM
Post #12
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 20 2008, 12:17 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 20 2008, 09:52 AM
- jackchit
- Jan 20 2008, 06:28 AM
- nicepants
- Jan 20 2008, 03:40 AM
- jackchit
- Jan 19 2008, 08:11 PM
Ronald is clearly insane, why would anyone really want to go on a "show" and debate a tour guide whilst the insane host does his Smithers to Roberts Mr Burns?
People should try to open the eyes of those willing to see rather than massage the ego of an old mad man and his 'friend'.
Who do you think should debate, then?
well certainly not tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. what a joke those 2 are
So you've told who it shouldn't be. Who should it be? (I mean on both sides) If Roberts is as dumb as you assert, he should be a very easy opponent.
Roberts isn't qualified to debate this issue that's clear. If I had a problem with my electrics i wouldn't ask the local toilet cleaner for advice its common sense. Why do you need people to debate this? are you incapable of thinking for yourself? If you choose to believe the official account then thats between you and your concience. Week is insane as also i believe is Roberts, after all Roberts does have a family history of mental illness his mother topped herself didn't she? I'd say that gives us an insight into how Mr Roberts mind has been affected by this tragedy, he has no social skills therefore tries to draw attention to himself by being a pain in the arse of anyone who dare think for themselves, its a way of feeling his pointless existance has a purpose. People who listen to his spewings and want to attach themselves to him in any way are only making the problem for him worse. He cannot begin the road to recovery until he accepts reality, I wish him all the best in his battle with his demons. Obviously you're no fan of Mr. Roberts...but if he's unqualified, wouldn't that give the TM an advantage in the debate? Wouldn't you WANT to be debating against someone who would be easy to defeat?
If he isn't qualified, who is?
|
|
|
| |
|
Domenick DiMaggio
|
Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
Post #13
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,006
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- 01/14/08
|
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right?
I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account.
So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 20 2008, 06:41 PM
Post #14
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account. So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why. how can you debate someone who is mentally ill like roberts.
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 20 2008, 06:47 PM
Post #15
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 20 2008, 06:41 PM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account. So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.
how can you debate someone who is mentally ill like roberts. and the BBC know nothing about this, A little bit of self promotion from roberts and his boyfriend me thinks, again they are devoid of facts.
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 20 2008, 10:51 PM
Post #16
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 20 2008, 06:41 PM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 20 2008, 03:47 PM
A NYC Tour Guide, A Public Access Show, And the BBC. And we're not supposed to believe CIA is involved in all of this, right? I'll appear on the show and challenge the BBC to play their uncensored, uncut, unedited interview with Mrs. Susan McElwain and show the World her real story instead of one small soundbite that was an answer one of their questions and not an actual part of her account. So pass that on to them and tell them to pass that on to their "handlers" at the "BBC" and when they ignore it everyone will know why.
how can you debate someone who is mentally ill like roberts. Do you have a source for that, or is it your own diagnosis?
If he's really that bad, I don't see what you're so scared of.
|
|
|
| |
|
Domenick DiMaggio
|
Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
Post #17
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,006
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- 01/14/08
|
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
|
|
|
| |
|
nolan ganwich
|
Jan 21 2008, 07:12 AM
Post #18
|
|
- Posts:
- 12
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #162
- Joined:
- 01/21/08
|
There is no BBC involvement with Hardfire, the corporation has already had its fingers burnt and will not be rushing into anything "911" for quite some time.
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
Post #19
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate..... They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
Post #20
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer. The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility. Now please stop pretending it has. no one cares.
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
Post #21
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility. Now please stop pretending it has. no one cares. The BBC? Or Hardfire?
Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
Post #22
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility. Now please stop pretending it has. no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire? Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on? No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it. we all make mistakes
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 21 2008, 02:39 PM
Post #23
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility. Now please stop pretending it has. no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire? Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it. we all make mistakes The parties of a debate speak more to the "credibility" than the venue. Perhaps you have an alternate venue & panel in mind?
|
|
|
| |
|
jackchit
|
Jan 21 2008, 05:56 PM
Post #24
|
|
- Posts:
- 103
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 02:39 PM
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility. Now please stop pretending it has. no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire? Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it. we all make mistakes
The parties of a debate speak more to the "credibility" than the venue. Perhaps you have an alternate venue & panel in mind? Yes I do, how about me and you? I'll let you decide the venue.
|
|
|
| |
|
nicepants
|
Jan 21 2008, 06:02 PM
Post #25
|
|
- Posts:
- 303
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 05:56 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 02:39 PM
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 02:23 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 02:16 PM
- jackchit
- Jan 21 2008, 01:55 PM
- nicepants
- Jan 21 2008, 10:05 AM
- Domenick DiMaggio CIT
- Jan 21 2008, 01:11 AM
I'm not scared. Oh yeah, that's why I didn't back out of the debate.....
They want someone who represents the Truth Movement...not another Fetzer.
The problem you have is that no-one will go on the debate because it has no credibility. Now please stop pretending it has. no one cares.
The BBC? Or Hardfire? Did it have credibility when Dylan & Jason went on?
No it didn't, they were ill advised to go on it. we all make mistakes
The parties of a debate speak more to the "credibility" than the venue. Perhaps you have an alternate venue & panel in mind?
Yes I do, how about me and you? I'll let you decide the venue. Hardfire. You can make the arrangements.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|