Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
NIST's Investigation on 911
Topic Started: Jul 25 2008, 09:42 AM (572 Views)
Khronic

Now, NIST has done a thorough investigation of 9/11. But I see them contradicting themselves a bit, am I wrong?

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

and popular mechanics tries to debunk, and miserably fails, ignorant scum.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tower
Member Avatar

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Morganti

NIST admit in their final report released for the collapse of the WTC Towers that they are unable to explain why what was observed happened. NIST used a blackbox computer model where they (according to their own admission) exagerrated different things in their models. Why? Because their initial models they modeled the plane strikes and fire burning for 3 hours, there was no collapse!

"They [NIST] can't even get the government scientists to lie."
- Alex Jones

NIST don't lie about too much, they aren't dishonest about too many things. Just a lot of skeptics never point out what I have mentioned above.
Edited by Morganti, Aug 1 2008, 04:21 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Investigate 9/11 · Next Topic »
Add Reply