| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| NIST's Investigation on 911 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 25 2008, 09:42 AM (572 Views) | |
| Khronic | Jul 25 2008, 09:42 AM Post #1 |
|
Now, NIST has done a thorough investigation of 9/11. But I see them contradicting themselves a bit, am I wrong? http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm and popular mechanics tries to debunk, and miserably fails, ignorant scum. http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html |
![]() |
|
| tower | Jul 26 2008, 03:29 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html |
![]() |
|
| Morganti | Aug 1 2008, 04:21 AM Post #3 |
|
NIST admit in their final report released for the collapse of the WTC Towers that they are unable to explain why what was observed happened. NIST used a blackbox computer model where they (according to their own admission) exagerrated different things in their models. Why? Because their initial models they modeled the plane strikes and fire burning for 3 hours, there was no collapse! "They [NIST] can't even get the government scientists to lie." - Alex Jones NIST don't lie about too much, they aren't dishonest about too many things. Just a lot of skeptics never point out what I have mentioned above. Edited by Morganti, Aug 1 2008, 04:21 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Investigate 9/11 · Next Topic » |







2:07 PM Jul 11