Bongo Thud

Jul 18 2008, 12:20 AM

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser.

Domenick DiMaggio

Jul 18 2008, 01:33 AM

Bongo Thud

Jul 18 2008, 12:20 AM

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser.

what did the 'criminal' do to deserve tasering? [legit question cuz i have no idea whats goin on....lol]

Bongo Thud

 

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser. What relevance does that have to the paradigm of 'skeptic' versus 'the cult 911 truth'? Absolutely none! But nonetheless, I am now only allowed to post in the skeptic's forum despite the fact that i do not buy the 9/11 official story, and I do support a new, complete, and open investigation. Whatever.

I'm simply going to switch IP addresses and re-register with another email address, a different forum name, and a different avatar. What have you accomplished?

Quote:

 

Bongo Thud

 

He should not have been stealing or throwing food. Hopefully he died before he could breed.

JFK

 

That was totally inappropriate.

See ya in a week.... In the skeptics section.

look-up

 

you're too kind.

Domenick DiMaggio

 

what did the 'criminal' do to deserve tasering? [legit question cuz i have no idea whats goin on....lol

Bongo Thud

 

HE was caught thieving something from his place of employment and became violent when confronted by police. They tased him. A fortunate side effect of this event is that it killed him, hopefully before he could reproduce and make more criminals.

Quote:

 

Co-workers, including a supervisor, said Turner was a reliable employee who had never been reprimanded at work. They said he had some disagreements with the customer service manager, who had asked him to tuck in his shirt and complained about Turner wearing gold teeth and big earrings.

Turner's mother, Tammy Fontenot, said her son had come home for lunch on March 20 and told her he'd stolen a couple of Hot Pockets from the store. He was afraid of getting into trouble, but she told him to go back and admit what he had done.

Goodenow said Monday that when Turner returned to the grocery after lunch, a supervisor told him to remove the sucker from his mouth and tuck in his shirt. The teenager began cursing, the prosecutor said.

The supervisor called the store manager to report what was happening. She said Turner was cursing and angry, and told the manager she felt threatened and was going to call police.

After the manager arrived, Turner began taunting him to get him to fight, Goodenow said. He threw a plastic counter-top display at the manager, she said, then picked up an umbrella and threw that at the manager. Then he advanced on the manager who was behind the customer service desk.

Goodenow said a witness recalled the police officer, who had witnessed at least part of the confrontation with the manager, yelling: “Freeze. Don't move. Stay where you are.”

Turner then began walking toward the officer, who had already pulled his Taser. When Turner was a few feet from Dawson, the officer fired the Taser.

Revid

Jul 18 2008, 05:52 PM

I agree with bongo. In a perfect world capital punishment would be carried out any time a citizen drives faster than the speed limit.

SPreston

Jul 18 2008, 07:12 AM

Bongo Thud

 

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser. What relevance does that have to the paradigm of 'skeptic' versus 'the cult 911 truth'? Absolutely none! But nonetheless, I am now only allowed to post in the skeptic's forum despite the fact that i do not buy the 9/11 official story, and I do support a new, complete, and open investigation. Whatever.

I'm simply going to switch IP addresses and re-register with another email address, a different forum name, and a different avatar. What have you accomplished?

Quote:

 

Bongo Thud

 

He should not have been stealing or throwing food. Hopefully he died before he could breed.

JFK

 

That was totally inappropriate.

See ya in a week.... In the skeptics section.

look-up

 

you're too kind.

Domenick DiMaggio

 

what did the 'criminal' do to deserve tasering? [legit question cuz i have no idea whats goin on....lol

Bongo Thud

 

HE was caught thieving something from his place of employment and became violent when confronted by police. They tased him. A fortunate side effect of this event is that it killed him, hopefully before he could reproduce and make more criminals.

Thievery does not require the death penalty according to the US justice system nor by the laws of GOD Almighty which our laws are based on. The teen should have confessed which he apparently did and repaid the theft. Whether he kept his job or not was up to management.

The teen could have been on any number of prescribed drugs such as Prozac or Ritalin, or on illegal drugs. The tazer use was unfortunate. Sadly modern day US police forces and military forces are largely made up of cowards who care not to risk themselves in a more appropriate confrontation against suspects and children and the public.

Your idiotic comment was inappropriate. There was obviously suddenly something wrong with the teen. He was deemed a reliable employee and his mother had sent him back to confess. But you had to make a stupid comment. When you return with your new screen name, you will likely be banned at that time. Good riddance.

Quote:

 

Co-workers, including a supervisor, said Turner was a reliable employee who had never been reprimanded at work. They said he had some disagreements with the customer service manager, who had asked him to tuck in his shirt and complained about Turner wearing gold teeth and big earrings.

Turner's mother, Tammy Fontenot, said her son had come home for lunch on March 20 and told her he'd stolen a couple of Hot Pockets from the store. He was afraid of getting into trouble, but she told him to go back and admit what he had done.

Goodenow said Monday that when Turner returned to the grocery after lunch, a supervisor told him to remove the sucker from his mouth and tuck in his shirt. The teenager began cursing, the prosecutor said.

The supervisor called the store manager to report what was happening. She said Turner was cursing and angry, and told the manager she felt threatened and was going to call police.

After the manager arrived, Turner began taunting him to get him to fight, Goodenow said. He threw a plastic counter-top display at the manager, she said, then picked up an umbrella and threw that at the manager. Then he advanced on the manager who was behind the customer service desk.

Goodenow said a witness recalled the police officer, who had witnessed at least part of the confrontation with the manager, yelling: “Freeze. Don't move. Stay where you are.”

Turner then began walking toward the officer, who had already pulled his Taser. When Turner was a few feet from Dawson, the officer fired the Taser.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/252065/Teenager_Dies_After_Being_Tasered

bongothud

 

He should not have been stealing or throwing food. Hopefully he died before he could breed.

Bongo Thud

Jul 18 2008, 03:46 AM

Domenick DiMaggio

Jul 18 2008, 01:33 AM

Bongo Thud

Jul 18 2008, 12:20 AM

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser.

what did the 'criminal' do to deserve tasering? [legit question cuz i have no idea whats goin on....lol]

HE was caught thieving something from his place of employment and became violent when confronted by police. They tased him. A fortunate side effect of this event is that it killed him, hopefully before he could reproduce and make more criminals.

Revid

Jul 18 2008, 05:52 PM

I agree with bongo. In a perfect world capital punishment would be carried out any time a citizen drives faster than the speed limit.

Quote:

 

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser. What relevance does that have to the paradigm of 'skeptic' versus 'the cult 911 truth'?

C.H.

Jul 19 2008, 03:04 PM

Quote:

 

I've been limited to the skeptics section because I made a post approving of the death of a criminal after he was shot with a taser. What relevance does that have to the paradigm of 'skeptic' versus 'the cult 911 truth'?

This comment, along with the tenacity in circumventing forum rules and your inability to comprehend the jist of SPreston's post suggests that you are not the type of person who can engage in constructive discussion.