Coroner Wally Miller

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2
3
4

Coroner Wally Miller
Topic Started: Jul 17 2008, 06:11 AM (2,493 Views)
tedscotland	Jul 31 2009, 04:22 AM Post #76
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 03:00 AM tedscotland Jul 30 2009, 01:03 PM who told Mr Miller that the tip of the right wing hit first? It wouldn't be the first time the ntsb made mistakes in their findings the fbi. you see they were trying to make sense with the crater shape and the blast trajectory. since the official version doesn't, they came up with their own. theirs is actually more believable if you sit down and think about and examine the evidence. but this too proves the official story a fable and the flight path to be false. since i documented the flight path from out on route 30 to indian lake which proves no impact in lambertsville and have shown the only explanation for the lack of the debris is a staged crash site we know the fbi's version didn't happen either. would i then be right in thinking the version that the fbi told Mr Miller was during initial clean up, and that the "official" ntsb came along at a later date.
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jul 31 2009, 04:46 AM Post #77
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 04:22 AM would i then be right in thinking the version that the fbi told Mr Miller was during initial clean up, and that the "official" ntsb came along at a later date. well the fbi were there the day of the attack trying to put the pieces together and the black boxes were allegedly recovered there several days later. which version do you find to be more consistent with the crash site and blast trajectory?
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


tedscotland	Jul 31 2009, 06:47 AM Post #78
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	well what Mr Miller describes seems more plausible but i am not a blast trajectory expert
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


ToS	Jul 31 2009, 03:44 PM Post #79
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 03:01 AM you mean like when wally asked how could hands and feet survive but no other remains and was told it was due to there being more tendons and some other bullshit? Exactly! Hey the claim that Wally found part of a spinal column and ribs. Was there flesh still on it and blood dripping from it, or where they just dry bare bones like dry bare bones seen in that white bucket that look like they came from people who've been dead from quite a while?
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


tedscotland	Jul 31 2009, 04:24 PM Post #80
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	ToS Jul 31 2009, 03:44 PM Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 03:01 AM you mean like when wally asked how could hands and feet survive but no other remains and was told it was due to there being more tendons and some other bullshit? Exactly! Hey the claim that Wally found part of a spinal column and ribs. Was there flesh still on it and blood dripping from it, or where they just dry bare bones like dry bare bones seen in that white bucket that look like they came from people who've been dead from quite a while? are you saying that is a photograph from the shanksville site containing victims bones in a bucket? I would not have thought human remains would have been collected this way
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


JFK	Jul 31 2009, 05:00 PM Post #81
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 04:24 PM ToS Jul 31 2009, 03:44 PM Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 03:01 AM you mean like when wally asked how could hands and feet survive but no other remains and was told it was due to there being more tendons and some other bullshit? Exactly! Hey the claim that Wally found part of a spinal column and ribs. Was there flesh still on it and blood dripping from it, or where they just dry bare bones like dry bare bones seen in that white bucket that look like they came from people who've been dead from quite a while? are you saying that is a photograph from the shanksville site containing victims bones in a bucket? I would not have thought human remains would have been collected this way
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


tedscotland	Jul 31 2009, 05:10 PM Post #82
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	JFK Jul 31 2009, 05:00 PM tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 04:24 PM ToS Jul 31 2009, 03:44 PM Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 03:01 AM you mean like when wally asked how could hands and feet survive but no other remains and was told it was due to there being more tendons and some other bullshit? Exactly! Hey the claim that Wally found part of a spinal column and ribs. Was there flesh still on it and blood dripping from it, or where they just dry bare bones like dry bare bones seen in that white bucket that look like they came from people who've been dead from quite a while? are you saying that is a photograph from the shanksville site containing victims bones in a bucket? I would not have thought human remains would have been collected this way how does that confirm it was human remains in the bucket?
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


JFK	Jul 31 2009, 05:23 PM Post #83
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 05:10 PM JFK Jul 31 2009, 05:00 PM tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 04:24 PM ToS Jul 31 2009, 03:44 PM Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 03:01 AM you mean like when wally asked how could hands and feet survive but no other remains and was told it was due to there being more tendons and some other bullshit? Exactly! Hey the claim that Wally found part of a spinal column and ribs. Was there flesh still on it and blood dripping from it, or where they just dry bare bones like dry bare bones seen in that white bucket that look like they came from people who've been dead from quite a while? are you saying that is a photograph from the shanksville site containing victims bones in a bucket? I would not have thought human remains would have been collected this way how does that confirm it was human remains in the bucket? It doesn't. Especially since I have grave doubts that flight 93 actually crashed in Shanksville. But it does confirm the manner in which the debris was collected.
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jul 31 2009, 06:52 PM Post #84
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 05:10 PM how does that confirm it was human remains in the bucket? because cia operative mark roberts says this is proof :
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


tedscotland	Aug 1 2009, 02:55 AM Post #85
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 06:52 PM tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 05:10 PM how does that confirm it was human remains in the bucket? because cia operative mark roberts says this is proof : i dont know who mark roberts is and i'm not sure if you are being sarcastic. But i do know if you are intending to identify human remains by a dna process you would not collect everything you find and keep it in a large white bucket, as this would contaminate the evidence.
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


tedscotland	Aug 1 2009, 08:15 AM Post #86
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	Domenick DiMaggio Jul 31 2009, 04:46 AM tedscotland Jul 31 2009, 04:22 AM would i then be right in thinking the version that the fbi told Mr Miller was during initial clean up, and that the "official" ntsb came along at a later date. well the fbi were there the day of the attack trying to put the pieces together and the black boxes were allegedly recovered there several days later. which version do you find to be more consistent with the crash site and blast trajectory? Domenick, what is your opinion of the article written by Jerry Mazza regarding what happened to flight 93. Its posted by an admin in the wt7 part of this forum. The title of the thread is "NY judge dismisses claim negligent construction caused wt7 collapse" Edited by tedscotland, Aug 1 2009, 08:29 AM.
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 1 2009, 11:13 AM Post #87
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	tedscotland Aug 1 2009, 02:55 AM i dont know who mark roberts is and i'm not sure if you are being sarcastic. But i do know if you are intending to identify human remains by a dna process you would not collect everything you find and keep it in a large white bucket, as this would contaminate the evidence. i haven't read the article but if it is another one of those "plane hits these towers not this tower this plane hit nothing so flight 93 was intended for wtc7" speculative and baseless conspriacy theories i have no interest in them and do not support that claim. the flight 93 operation was planned in advance just like the pentagon and wtc. the story wasn't written on the fly. the scene wasn't staged without preparation or advanced knowledge. oh my bad, mark roberts is a 'nyc tour guide' that every enemy of truth cites when arguing against us. i agree with your assessment. this is not how human remains should be handled and i don't think this is standard operating procedure. this is total lack of respect for the dead.
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


tedscotland	Aug 3 2009, 02:41 PM Post #88
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	Domenick DiMaggio Aug 1 2009, 11:13 AM tedscotland Aug 1 2009, 02:55 AM i dont know who mark roberts is and i'm not sure if you are being sarcastic. But i do know if you are intending to identify human remains by a dna process you would not collect everything you find and keep it in a large white bucket, as this would contaminate the evidence. i haven't read the article but if it is another one of those "plane hits these towers not this tower this plane hit nothing so flight 93 was intended for wtc7" speculative and baseless conspriacy theories i have no interest in them and do not support that claim. the flight 93 operation was planned in advance just like the pentagon and wtc. the story wasn't written on the fly. the scene wasn't staged without preparation or advanced knowledge. oh my bad, mark roberts is a 'nyc tour guide' that every enemy of truth cites when arguing against us. i agree with your assessment. this is not how human remains should be handled and i don't think this is standard operating procedure. this is total lack of respect for the dead. sorry to harp on about this but i just want to be clear. Are you saying that it IS human remains being collected in that bucket?
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


noeffects	Aug 3 2009, 06:56 PM Post #89
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	These are NOT from Shanksville! just comparing some ol' bucket o' bones for ya. I see similarities...like the porous ends...knuckle-like objects... who cleaned this site up ?... ask them if they respectfully put bones in a bucket you can buy at Home Depot...I'm sure you have a list tedscotland...
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 3 2009, 08:01 PM Post #90
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	tedscotland Aug 3 2009, 02:41 PM sorry to harp on about this but i just want to be clear. Are you saying that it IS human remains being collected in that bucket? i'm not, no. cia operative by day and tour guide by night mark roberts and the minions of randi's kids that have infected forums all across the internet make that claim. i've looked through the coroners photos personally. i heard a decent amount of animal bones were found during the searches. i wouldn't be a bit surprised if that was what we were really looking at as this is obviously no way to treat the remains of human beings.
Posts: 2,002 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


JFK	Aug 3 2009, 09:38 PM Post #91
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	The URL of the image Domenick posted is http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/HumanRemainsShanksvillecopy.jpg/HumanRemainsShanksvillecopy-full.jpg wtc7lies.googlepages.com is Mark Roberts AKA Gravy's site. This is Mark Roberts Attached to this post: Mark_Roberts.gif (39.76 KB) Edited by JFK, Aug 3 2009, 09:41 PM.
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


tedscotland	Aug 4 2009, 02:28 AM Post #92
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08	Domenick DiMaggio Aug 3 2009, 08:01 PM tedscotland Aug 3 2009, 02:41 PM sorry to harp on about this but i just want to be clear. Are you saying that it IS human remains being collected in that bucket? i'm not, no. cia operative by day and tour guide by night mark roberts and the minions of randi's kids that have infected forums all across the internet make that claim. i've looked through the coroners photos personally. i heard a decent amount of animal bones were found during the searches. i wouldn't be a bit surprised if that was what we were really looking at as this is obviously no way to treat the remains of human beings. 100% agree. There is no way they would be treated like that and anybody saying thats human bones in the bucket is either dillusional or an idiot.
Posts: 51 Group: Members Member #851 Joined: 09/15/08


JFK	Aug 4 2009, 07:32 AM Post #93
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	tedscotland Aug 4 2009, 02:28 AM Domenick DiMaggio Aug 3 2009, 08:01 PM tedscotland Aug 3 2009, 02:41 PM sorry to harp on about this but i just want to be clear. Are you saying that it IS human remains being collected in that bucket? i'm not, no. cia operative by day and tour guide by night mark roberts and the minions of randi's kids that have infected forums all across the internet make that claim. i've looked through the coroners photos personally. i heard a decent amount of animal bones were found during the searches. i wouldn't be a bit surprised if that was what we were really looking at as this is obviously no way to treat the remains of human beings. 100% agree. There is no way they would be treated like that and anybody saying thats human bones in the bucket is either dillusional or an idiot. Would you rather see them in potholes ?
Posts: 4,211 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Shanksville · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
4