The Mossad and the Truck Bombs of 9/11

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2
3
…
6

The Mossad and the Truck Bombs of 9/11
Topic Started: Jan 14 2008, 11:46 PM (4,059 Views)
fortuneteller	Jan 21 2008, 06:26 PM Post #26
Posts: 173 Group: BANNED! Member #152 Joined: 01/20/08	For all you know, the trucks were designed to make you think somebody else did it.
Posts: 173 Group: BANNED! Member #152 Joined: 01/20/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 22 2008, 12:47 AM Post #27
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	yeah it was that tricky al qaeda always too steps ahead of everyone. all the way down to having israeli citizenships.........
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 22 2008, 12:02 PM Post #28
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	yeah, all the 19 hijackers had israeli citizenship. and whats with that mossad team jumping up and down on a van to celebrate their operation? didnt they take Incognito 101? How to Not be Seen 101?
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 22 2008, 12:28 PM Post #29
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 22 2008, 12:02 PM yeah, all the 19 hijackers had israeli citizenship. and whats with that mossad team jumping up and down on a van to celebrate their operation? didnt they take Incognito 101? How to Not be Seen 101? What about the 60 Israeli's arrested after 9/11? Didn't they take Incognito 101? And please provide hardcore undeniable proof that the 19 Arabs you claimed are responsible in fact boarded the planes you say they did that day. And can you list what was all recovered from the van driven by the "5 dancing Israeli's"? You know the van that drove the bomb sniffing dogs nuts even though explosives weren't found? I know there was a large amount of cash............some boxcutters..........and I recall there being something else oh....what was it??? Oh YEAH!!!!!! Passports belonging to other (non-Israeli) Saudi Nationals.....kind of like the ones that survived inside the clothes of those wacky Arabs inside the cockpits of the planes that slammed into the buildings and destroyed every trace of those Arabs. US Passports > US Black Boxes Right?
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 22 2008, 04:31 PM Post #30
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	can u prove the 19 hijackers did not get on the planes? what about the thousands of arabs that were also detained after 9-11? by your logic, simply being arrested makes you guilt. how very NWO of you. Edited by arbor, Jan 22 2008, 04:33 PM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 22 2008, 09:27 PM Post #31
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Domenick DiMaggio CIT Jan 22 2008, 12:28 PM And can you list what was all recovered from the van driven by the "5 dancing Israeli's"? You know the van that drove the bomb sniffing dogs nuts even though explosives weren't found? I know there was a large amount of cash............some boxcutters..........and I recall there being something else oh....what was it???
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 22 2008, 09:40 PM Post #32
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	why dont you provide a link to a legitimate newspaper article.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 23 2008, 12:05 AM Post #33
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 22 2008, 09:40 PM why dont you provide a link to a legitimate newspaper article. you sure don't like 'debunking' do you? you're really not that good at it.......... look, this is how someone answers a question : let's start with one of the 'debunkers' all time #1 favorite source : FAUX NEWS Quote: The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards. Haaretz Quote: Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. The Record, the Official Paper of New Jersey Quote: The five men, who were in a van stopped on Route 3 in East Rutherford around 4:30 p.m., were being questioned by police but had not been charged with any crime late Tuesday. The Bergen County Police bomb squad X-rayed packages found inside the van but did not find any explosives, authorities said. However, sources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men to the bombing plot. "There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted," the source said. "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." Counter Punch Quote: On the afternoon of September 11, 2001, an FBI bulletin known as a BOLO - "be on lookout" -- was issued with regard to three suspicious men who that morning were seen leaving the New Jersey waterfront minutes after the first plane hit World Trade Center 1. Law enforcement officers across the New York-New Jersey area were warned in the radio dispatch to watch for a "vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack": White, 2000 Chevrolet van with 'Urban Moving Systems' sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals. There's more but I'm going to bed tonight. I'll post more tomorrow.
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 23 2008, 01:56 PM Post #34
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	"The Bergen County Police bomb squad X-rayed packages found inside the van but did not find any explosives, authorities said." case closed. "The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack" and this is due to the NY Times investigative interviews of the witnesses? How could they possibly know that the camera were set up BEFORE the plane impacts? Spare me. Debunk this: http://web.archive.org/web/20011107142011/http://www.thejournalnews.com/newsroom/101101/11warumors.html And this: http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/18261.html Edited by arbor, Jan 23 2008, 01:59 PM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 23 2008, 09:37 PM Post #35
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 23 2008, 01:56 PM "The Bergen County Police bomb squad X-rayed packages found inside the van but did not find any explosives, authorities said." case closed. "The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack" and this is due to the NY Times investigative interviews of the witnesses? How could they possibly know that the camera were set up BEFORE the plane impacts? Spare me. The question from Arbor that is actually relevant to the topic is : How could they possibly know that the camera were set up BEFORE the plane impacts? Spare me. The answer is of course : After the 1st impact at the WTC, residents looked outside their windows and saw these men filming/photographing/celebrating the success operation. Quote: Debunk this: http://web.archive.org/web/20011107142011/http://www.thejournalnews.com/newsroom/101101/11warumors.html And this: http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/18261.html Go start your own thread in the appropriate forums and argue your topics there. This topic is about Israeli Mossad involvement in the 9/11 attacks. It isn't about hijackers and school children. Now do you need to see more or are you willing to concede the video presented is factual and true?
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 23 2008, 11:14 PM Post #36
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	It is completaly factual that the news folks reported these unsubstantiated and uninvestigated stories. I remember when JFK Jr.'s plane went down, Dan Rather reported that wreckage from the plane had washed ashore on a beach. Yet it turns out the witness to this wreckage was a Howard Stern fan playing a practical joke. In a crisis, the news media tends to report anything and everything, with or without evidence and confirmation. Why cant you grasp this? Edited by arbor, Jan 23 2008, 11:18 PM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 23 2008, 11:33 PM Post #37
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 23 2008, 11:14 PM It is completaly factual that the news folks reported these unsubstantiated and uninvestigated stories. I remember when JFK Jr.'s plane went down, Dan Rather reported that wreckage from the plane had washed ashore on a beach. Yet it turns out the witness to this wreckage was a Howard Stern fan playing a practical joke. In a crisis, the news media tends to report anything and everything, with or without evidence and confirmation. Why cant you grasp this? And you're proof that these reports are unsubstantiated and uninvestigated is...........??? Because I believe they are substantiated and investigated.....
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 24 2008, 09:41 AM Post #38
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	No one looked into the reports of the mysterious white vans filled with explosives. No one looked into the explosion at the State Dept. On that silly day, the news people just reported rumors. Peter Jennings went back to chain smoking and telephone hoaxes became credible evidence. Its really funny how you doubt and question everything that comes from the sinister "MSM"....accept when it validates your own theories. Cake and eat it too huh? Edited by arbor, Jan 24 2008, 09:42 AM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 24 2008, 10:07 AM Post #39
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 24 2008, 09:41 AM No one looked into the reports of the mysterious white vans filled with explosives. if no one looked into that then how did all the Israeli's (including Mossad with explosives backgrounds) end up arrested the days following? you lie. you lie to defend israel. repeatedly. are you a zionist?
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 24 2008, 04:40 PM Post #40
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	"you lie. you lie to defend israel. repeatedly. are you a zionist?" Dude. You clearly dont wanna talk to me like a gentleman. Edited by arbor, Jan 24 2008, 04:41 PM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 24 2008, 05:09 PM Post #41
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 24 2008, 04:40 PM "you lie. you lie to defend israel. repeatedly. are you a zionist?" Dude. You clearly dont wanna talk to me like a gentleman. why can't you answer the question(s) Arbor? If no one looked into anything then how did the 60+ Israeli Mossad end up in jail? Why did Dominic Suter flee the country? I stand by my words. You lie to defend Israel. You do it repeatedly. I also asked you if you are a Zionist. Are you? I did not use vulgar language nor did I insult you so I would say I am responding in a gentlemanly manner, thank you.
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 24 2008, 05:38 PM Post #42
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	Calling someone a liar isnt very "gentlemanly". Im done with you. God bless the ignore function..=) Edited by arbor, Jan 24 2008, 05:57 PM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 24 2008, 09:11 PM Post #43
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	you're done because you can't address the presentation and additional evidence presented so far
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


A-Train	Jan 24 2008, 10:04 PM Post #44
Posts: 10 Group: Members Member #47 Joined: 01/15/08	arbor Jan 23 2008, 11:14 PM It is completaly factual that the news folks reported these unsubstantiated and uninvestigated stories. I remember when JFK Jr.'s plane went down, Dan Rather reported that wreckage from the plane had washed ashore on a beach. Yet it turns out the witness to this wreckage was a Howard Stern fan playing a practical joke. In a crisis, the news media tends to report anything and everything, with or without evidence and confirmation. Why cant you grasp this? If you watch the clip of Dan Rather reporting on the evening of 9/11, you will see that he does not report that explosives were found in the van; he reports that the FBI had reported finding explosives in the van, and that the FBI had said it was enough to do great damage to the George Washington bridge. That's a little different than a Howard Stern fan phoning in about wreckage on a beach.
Posts: 10 Group: Members Member #47 Joined: 01/15/08


arbor	Jan 24 2008, 10:34 PM Post #45
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	and Dan Rather got his information from whom? the same people who said that there was a car bomb at the state dept.? the same people who said wtc 7 had collapsed even though it was still standing? the same people who said there were 8 hijackings? the same people who announced that the crash of flight 587 was most likely a terror attack?
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Lin Kuei	Jan 25 2008, 01:13 AM Post #46
Posts: 1,312 Group: Admins Member #5 Joined: 12/22/07	Arbor, I have to say if you do not have anything logical to argue about then do not do so simply for the sake of it.
Posts: 1,312 Group: Admins Member #5 Joined: 12/22/07


arbor	Jan 25 2008, 05:07 PM Post #47
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	i believe my argument is 100% logical. on 9-11, the MSM announced several whte vans with explosives in nj. this is taken, by some, to be 100% proof positive. on 9-11, the MSM also announced a car bomb at the state dept. (absolutely untrue) 8 possible hijackings (absolutely untrue). when flight 587 went down, ABC news reported that the incident was likely due to a terror attack (absolutely untrue. my point, a very logical one, is that in the heat of a moment and in a crisis, the knee jerk reports of the media CAN NOT be taken without a grain of salt. news reports must be investigated, confirmed, and double- confirmed. otherwise anything goes and we will just believe anything. Edited by arbor, Jan 25 2008, 05:07 PM.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Jan 30 2008, 09:23 AM Post #48
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	arbor Jan 25 2008, 05:07 PM i believe my argument is 100% logical. that's a shame because it isn't. Quote: on 9-11, the MSM announced several whte vans with explosives in nj. this is taken, by some, to be 100% proof positive. on 9-11, the MSM also announced a car bomb at the state dept. (absolutely untrue) 8 possible hijackings (absolutely untrue). when flight 587 went down, ABC news reported that the incident was likely due to a terror attack (absolutely untrue. because events B, C, & D didn't take place it is safe to say event A didn't take place. this is your "logic" and that simple sentence demonstrates why it is so fatally flawed. how many people were arrested in connection to a car bomb at the state dept? NONE how many people were arrested in connection with other hijacked flights? NONE how many people were arrested in connection with flight 587? NONE how many people were arrested in connection with the vans in NY? 60+ One of these is not like the other one........
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


arbor	Jan 30 2008, 12:02 PM Post #49
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08	5,000 Muslims arrested right after 9-11...but there is no story there. 60 Israelis arrested...and they are all guilty. Fascinating.
Posts: 450 Group: BANNED! Member #100 Joined: 01/16/08


Lin Kuei	Jan 30 2008, 01:44 PM Post #50
Posts: 1,312 Group: Admins Member #5 Joined: 12/22/07	arbor Jan 30 2008, 12:02 PM 5,000 Muslims arrested right after 9-11...but there is no story there. 60 Israelis arrested...and they are all guilty. Actually no it is exactly the opposite. The information about the arrested Israelis was hardly ever spoken about following the first news reports. And what do you mean about "there is no story there" re. the Muslims arrested after 9/11??!?!?! Are you serious? That's ALL we heard! The very fact the information re. the Israeli citizens arrest was not repeated is suspect I have to admit... No-one is saying Israel did 9/11, and if they do they are ignorant and uninformed to say the least. It is the same as saying the United States did 9/11. We CANNOT use simplistic language in this situation! The scope of the operation is FAR beyond that of singular nation states (more so a supranational interest).
Posts: 1,312 Group: Admins Member #5 Joined: 12/22/07


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Israeli/Mossad 9/11 Involvement · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
…
6