Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower
Topic Started: Jul 5 2008, 05:38 PM (969 Views)
Ross
Member Avatar

The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower is tomorrow. Set your Vcr's to stun.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lee2008

What's a VCR? Those who still use them must think the new devices are some sort of government conspiracy ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ross
Member Avatar

Fine, set your betamax to stun.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rich
Member Avatar

Ross
Jul 5 2008, 07:44 PM
Fine, set your betamax to stun.
Haha that made my laugh.

Anyways, we still use a VCR in our house, my dad thinks it's fine as it is lol.

I'll be watching tonight, you can count on that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DabeesUK

I'm watching it now, they are trying their best to defend the official story. But IMHO are failing very badly.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DabeesUK

PMSL They just had Mark Roberts on as some kind of expert. Now i believe them. :D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lee2008

The tape of BBC World News announcing early collapse of WT7 was misplaced because it was put on the 2003 shelf rather than the 2001 shelf. The most memorable event of human kind misplaced due to cock-up according to the programme, you couldn't make it up. (But it looks like thats exactly what they have done ;) )
Edited by lee2008, Jul 6 2008, 04:31 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ron1872

The point is that they did not mention Barry Jennings statement that he heard load explosions beneath the 6th floor while the Twin Towers were still standing. They cut this at after about 10 minutes in the programme. I hope it will be online soon for people in the US, so you can see what they did!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Therese

Just watched it here in the UK.one last Sunday,and one yesterday.how much wool do they think they will have to use to have enough to pull over peoples eyes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
look-up
Member Avatar

so they lied about Barry Jennings, then. Classic.

To ommit something like the explosions he heard, is truly a lie, isn't it? Should we kid ourselves about definitions now? They are lying to us every time we turn on the "tube"... thats for my brittish friends! ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Headspin
Member Avatar

ron1872
Jul 7 2008, 12:21 AM
The point is that they did not mention Barry Jennings statement that he heard load explosions beneath the 6th floor while the Twin Towers were still standing. They cut this at after about 10 minutes in the programme. I hope it will be online soon for people in the US, so you can see what they did!
but did Barry Jennings give that statement to the BBC?

Mr Jennings has clearly changed his story with regard to bodies in wtc7, his claims that he was misrepresented as saying he "saw" bodies rather than "felt" bodies seems to be only a technical difference, and not necessarily significant, even if true.

the bbc edited the program with images of dusty floors as barry is describing his descent to floor 6, implying his descent was after the south tower collapse. this is clearly in contradiction to his initial testimony, but i don't think they state explicitly the timeline - it looks deceptive to me.

I'd have to watch it again for details, but i was left with the impression that they gave a false timeline.

all the original footage in entirety made by LC would be useful to examine.

I think the show overall was better than I expected, but its always the last 10 minutes that matter most and they are pretty bad.

they got the nanothermite, iron spherules etc....and - Mark Loizeaux talking about miles of wiring (how many miles of wiring do they need to detonate explosives on spacecraft Mark?).
Edited by Headspin, Jul 7 2008, 02:56 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
look-up
Member Avatar

Skeptics, what do you think of the way this evidence was portrayed by BBC? Was it honest to show the dusty floors as if Barry was really there after one of the collapses, or do you think that is fair game?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rich
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
I'd have to watch it again for details, but i was left with the impression that they gave a false timeline.


I know what you mean. They were showing his account whilst also talking about the collapse of the first towers, to make it seem as if what he said about the explosions was AFTER the collapes. But it wasnt. They also missed out his part about the WTC7 lobby being destroyed before anything had collapsed that day.
Edited by Rich, Jul 8 2008, 05:04 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · 9/11 Truth and Loose Change in the Media · Next Topic »
Add Reply