Eyewitness Dale Browning

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Eyewitness Dale Browning; "Everybody's seen this thing ....."
Topic Started: Jun 20 2008, 08:30 PM (406 Views)
Domenick DiMaggio	Jun 20 2008, 08:30 PM Post #1
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	A quick google search of 'Dale Browning Flight 93' turns you up 10,700 hits. But all you're going to find in the printed media is one simple little sentence : Quote: "Everybody's seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is." For the longest time I didn't know what to make of this quote attributed to one obscure witness until I met Susan McElwain and learned of the presence of a small UAV in Stoystown flying North towards the crash site that morning. Now suddenly Mr. Browning's words took a whole new meaning onto me. For a period of about 3 months after filming Mrs. McElwain I repeatedly attempted to contact Mr. Browning for clarification. The Browning's seem to screen their calls as the answering machine all kicks on after the 1st ring regardless of what day and time of day you attempt to contact them. I left in all a total of about 8 messages on Mr. Browning's machine just giving him my name and phone number and a quick explanation of what project I have chosen to undertake here in Shanksville. Dale never returned any of my calls. Upon clarification from an eyewitness that doesn't wish to be identified that corroborated the account of Mrs. McElwain, I had the closest thing I could find of an image of the plane this witness and Mrs. McElwain saw that morning. I made the decision to take the 2 above images and a DVD of Mrs. McElwain and send them to Dale in hopes he would feel more comfortable talking about what he saw that morning. I waited about 10 days or so and I attempted to contact Mr. Browning for the first time in nearly 12 months. On the first ring the answering machine kicked on to my disappointment. I once again started to leave the same message I had left many times before when to my surprise Mr. Browning picked up the phone. Needless to say, I was very hopeful that he had a change of heart and decided to talk about what he say. Unfortunately this is 2008 and not 2001. I can now give you the direct quote of Dale Browning in this regard : Quote: I didn't see anything. I inquired then about how the quote originated and how the media had identified him as the source of it to which his response was : Quote: I didn't talk to the media. Then I explained to him what I was doing and why I had contacted him and thanked him for his time when in closing he said : Quote: People say they saw something up there at the cross roads [Bridge St. / Buckstown Rd.] that morning but I didn't see anything. And that was that. Perhaps Mr. Browning didn't see anything and was only telling the press about what others had witnessed or perhaps Mr. Browning is afraid to speak publicly like the 2nd UAV witness I have located. I could hear the nervousness in his voice while I spoke with him and I could also tell Dale was an older gentleman getting up there in years. But I left my contact info with him and encouraged him to share the DVD and pics that I sent with those who may have said they saw it that morning and ended the conversation there. And at this time that closes the book on Dale Browning as far as my research goes.
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


SPreston	Jun 20 2008, 10:17 PM Post #2
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	Wingspan 7.2 feet



Shopnut	Aug 1 2008, 08:20 PM Post #3
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	So is there any chance that she saw a radio controled airplane being flown by a hobbist? Something like this perhaps? http://www.zagi.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=187
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 1 2008, 11:43 PM Post #4
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	NO.
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Shopnut	Aug 2 2008, 02:31 AM Post #5
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	Why do you think that?
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 2 2008, 03:47 AM Post #6
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	because i spoke to susan mcelwain & rick chaney and neither of them seemed to think it was a 'hobbyists' plane.....
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Shopnut	Aug 2 2008, 12:44 PM Post #7
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	Did they say why? I have watched RC models numerous times and it can be hard to judge distance and size unless you have lots of experience with them. Some of the models are over eight feet in size also.
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 2 2008, 04:32 PM Post #8
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	well for starters no one from the area ever came forward and said sorry about scaring you all with my remote control hobby plane...... rick chaney believes there was a human being in it. 1 human being. another witness i spoke with [who is willing to testify but not go public without a trial] believes there had to be a person [1 person] inside of it because it had 'a little window'.
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Shopnut	Aug 2 2008, 09:16 PM Post #9
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	Domenick DiMaggio Aug 2 2008, 04:32 PM well for starters no one from the area ever came forward and said sorry about scaring you all with my remote control hobby plane...... rick chaney believes there was a human being in it. 1 human being. another witness i spoke with [who is willing to testify but not go public without a trial] believes there had to be a person [1 person] inside of it because it had 'a little window'. Well it is possible that anyone flying an RC plane might want to spare themselves the wrath of those might accuse the transmitter operator of being part of the plot to attack the US. Didn't Rick Chaney say it might have been a drone? Drones are unmanned. Many of the models also have windows. I'm not saying it was a radio controlled model, just suggesting it may be a viable theory.
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Aug 3 2008, 12:31 AM Post #10
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Shopnut Aug 2 2008, 09:16 PM Well it is possible that anyone flying an RC plane might want to spare themselves the wrath of those might accuse the transmitter operator of being part of the plot to attack the US. Didn't Rick Chaney say it might have been a drone? Drones are unmanned. Many of the models also have windows. I'm not saying it was a radio controlled model, just suggesting it may be a viable theory. there was no conspiracy theory or "wrath" the day and following days after the attack. it would have been way more believable to tell susan she saw someone's hobby plane than to tell her she saw a 757 and just doesn't know what one looks like....... rick chaney said it put him in mind of what he would call a 'scout' plane...... it isn't a viable theory because there is no evidence to support it. not a drop other than you suggesting it on the internet.
Posts: 2,001 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Shanksville · Next Topic »