Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
911 Jet Fuel Fire Melted WTC Steel?; this is not what caused wtc failure tho
Topic Started: Jun 18 2008, 07:39 PM (174 Views)
mynameis
Member Avatar
Internet Jujitsu
Chemistry
911 Jet Fuel Fire Melted WTC Steel?


Entropy
melting steel WTC model with blowtorch


2nd law of Newtonian Physics simulation
WTC Impact Model (w. No Core)


June 2005 (lies more than truth)
Concrete vs. Steel Print this Article Email this Article
Which is the better building material? You be the judge.
http://www.buildings.com/articles/detail.aspx?contentID=2511
Edited by mynameis, Jun 18 2008, 09:42 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mbrown
Member Avatar

Shit...now I've got to reopen my hs chemistry book - good find.
Edited by mbrown, Jun 18 2008, 07:58 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Flippy

Post of the week.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mynameis
Member Avatar
Internet Jujitsu
Flippy
Jun 18 2008, 10:27 PM
Post of the week.
This is still speculative and old information. This doesn't take into account the other fuel sources.

Note: I should also add that even under perfect conditions the fuel would be spent very quickly.
Edited by mynameis, Jun 18 2008, 11:04 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Flippy

It is very sad that the 9/11 truth movement has been forced into campaigns of show and tell, 2+2, 1 cinder block dropped on top of 3 cinder blocks, 3000 degree surviving super humans visible in windows, to show how ridiculous the official story is.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mynameis
Member Avatar
Internet Jujitsu
Flippy
Jun 18 2008, 11:30 PM
It is very sad that the 9/11 truth movement has been forced into campaigns of show and tell, 2+2, 1 cinder block dropped on top of 3 cinder blocks, 3000 degree surviving super humans visible in windows, to show how ridiculous the official story is.
Yep. I am sick and tired of being sick and tired of repeating the same information. We need a 9/11 dummies guide for physics or something equivalent: pretty pictures, charts, graphs, my little 911 "unmentionable theory" ponies.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mid life rethinker
Member Avatar

First of all, I am proud of myself as I actually could follow this - the college chemistry is still in my brain somehow. I only wish he could put in the energy the contents of the building provided. But, since the OCT says the jet fuel did it, he left it at that I guess.
Could you just see Bush's face if he was to watch this video? I'm cracking myself up picturing it. Dazed and confused.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Flippy

You really think Bush can work the "internets"?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LKTH6f1JfX8
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sam

mid life rethinker
Jun 19 2008, 07:58 AM
First of all, I am proud of myself as I actually could follow this - the college chemistry is still in my brain somehow. I only wish he could put in the energy the contents of the building provided. But, since the OCT says the jet fuel did it, he left it at that I guess.
Could you just see Bush's face if he was to watch this video? I'm cracking myself up picturing it. Dazed and confused.
The so called official theory in no way says jet fuel caused the steel to melt.
The jet fuel was the incendiary that started the fire.
Saying jet fuel melted the steel is like saying lighter fluid I put on charcoal cooked the hamburgers.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Sam
Jun 19 2008, 12:04 PM
mid life rethinker
Jun 19 2008, 07:58 AM
First of all, I am proud of myself as I actually could follow this - the college chemistry is still in my brain somehow. I only wish he could put in the energy the contents of the building provided. But, since the OCT says the jet fuel did it, he left it at that I guess.
Could you just see Bush's face if he was to watch this video? I'm cracking myself up picturing it. Dazed and confused.
The so called official theory in no way says jet fuel caused the steel to melt.
The jet fuel was the incendiary that started the fire.
Saying jet fuel melted the steel is like saying lighter fluid I put on charcoal cooked the hamburgers.
Yeah, but did the charcoal cause a complete and global collapse of the grille ? ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sam

JFK
Jun 19 2008, 12:15 PM
Sam
Jun 19 2008, 12:04 PM
mid life rethinker
Jun 19 2008, 07:58 AM
First of all, I am proud of myself as I actually could follow this - the college chemistry is still in my brain somehow. I only wish he could put in the energy the contents of the building provided. But, since the OCT says the jet fuel did it, he left it at that I guess.
Could you just see Bush's face if he was to watch this video? I'm cracking myself up picturing it. Dazed and confused.
The so called official theory in no way says jet fuel caused the steel to melt.
The jet fuel was the incendiary that started the fire.
Saying jet fuel melted the steel is like saying lighter fluid I put on charcoal cooked the hamburgers.
Yeah, but did the charcoal cause a complete and global collapse of the grille ? ;)
The way I BBQ it might!

But do you deny that claiming the official story is jet fuel melted the steel is both misleading and incorrect.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Sam
Jun 19 2008, 12:33 PM
JFK
Jun 19 2008, 12:15 PM
Sam
Jun 19 2008, 12:04 PM
mid life rethinker
Jun 19 2008, 07:58 AM
First of all, I am proud of myself as I actually could follow this - the college chemistry is still in my brain somehow. I only wish he could put in the energy the contents of the building provided. But, since the OCT says the jet fuel did it, he left it at that I guess.
Could you just see Bush's face if he was to watch this video? I'm cracking myself up picturing it. Dazed and confused.
The so called official theory in no way says jet fuel caused the steel to melt.
The jet fuel was the incendiary that started the fire.
Saying jet fuel melted the steel is like saying lighter fluid I put on charcoal cooked the hamburgers.
Yeah, but did the charcoal cause a complete and global collapse of the grille ? ;)
The way I BBQ it might!

But do you deny that claiming the official story is jet fuel melted the steel is both misleading and incorrect.

The early official story was that the jet fuel melted the structure, And yes I agree that that was misleading and incorrect.

Try the internet archive sometime - http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

I also believe that the current official story is also misleading and incorrect, so the more things change the more they remain the same. ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mid life rethinker
Member Avatar

I'd bet that the average joe on the street still thinks that the jet fuel caused the steel to melt.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic »
Add Reply