SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation
Topic Started: Jun 4 2008, 09:23 PM (982 Views)
Aldo Marquis CIT	Jun 5 2008, 12:45 PM Post #26
Posts: 1,642 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	JFK Jun 5 2008, 12:34 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jun 5 2008, 12:16 PM JFK Jun 5 2008, 10:13 AM As far as the 84 RADES data, I am currently assuming that is it valid. Thus far I have seen nothing to deem it otherwise. JFK, Don't let him bully you. The RADES data is fruadelant on so many levels. Let's start with Chaconas. He proves it is fraudelant. The north side witnesses prove it is fraudelant. Even our biggest detractor and 757 impact proponent, John Farmer, admits the RADES data is fraudelant. Aldo, I am not letting him "bully" me.... And just to make you aware, you won't either. At this point I am still new to the RADES data and software and prefer to keep an open mind as to it being legit. Uh ok, JFK. I wasn't trying to bully you. But clearly, Reheat did by bullying you with his emotionally charged strawman about the 84 RADES crew. May I remind you of this: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/222497/ You posted this JFK. You do know that this proves the RADES data fraudelant, don't you? I suggest you do some research, as this information has been around for quite a while now. Do you need more evidence? Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Jun 5 2008, 12:57 PM.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Jun 5 2008, 12:55 PM Post #27
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Bottom line within the context of an investigation into government involvement in 9/11 all data that was solely controlled and provided for by the government must not be assumed valid. It would be contradictory to the entire point of this forum's existence to do so. But there is a massive amount of evidence that the alleged radar data released to John Farmer via FOIA is fraudulent. Even Farmer has stated that it was manipulated.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


JFK	Jun 5 2008, 01:11 PM Post #28
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jun 5 2008, 12:45 PM JFK Jun 5 2008, 12:34 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Jun 5 2008, 12:16 PM JFK Jun 5 2008, 10:13 AM As far as the 84 RADES data, I am currently assuming that is it valid. Thus far I have seen nothing to deem it otherwise. JFK, Don't let him bully you. The RADES data is fruadelant on so many levels. Let's start with Chaconas. He proves it is fraudelant. The north side witnesses prove it is fraudelant. Even our biggest detractor and 757 impact proponent, John Farmer, admits the RADES data is fraudelant. Aldo, I am not letting him "bully" me.... And just to make you aware, you won't either. At this point I am still new to the RADES data and software and prefer to keep an open mind as to it being legit. Uh ok, JFK. I wasn't trying to bully you. But clearly, Reheat did by bullying you with his emotionally charged strawman about the 84 RADES crew. May remind you of this: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/222497/ You posted this JFK. You do know that this proves the RADES data fraudelant, don't you? I suggest you do some research, as this information has been around for quite a while now. Do you need more evidence? Yes Aldo I am well aware of that thread... as a matter of fact I have synchronized the NORAD tapes with the RS3 software and watched what it is that they were talking about. My conclusion is that the only ones who did not have their head up their ass on 911 is Boston Center in Nashua, NH. Some research ? What is it that you think I am doing ? Honestly, what I would love is for someone to hand me the data tag from 77 with a verifiable chain of custody which leads back to inside of the Pentagon..... But I realize that will never happen. So unless you object to me researching what is available to research within my resources, I will continue.... Actually, I will continue regardless of whether you object.
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Jun 5 2008, 01:13 PM Post #29
Posts: 1,642 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Go right ahead. My only suggestion is you research, and THEN come to a conclusion. As we already have and we have the evidence to back it up.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


JFK	Jun 5 2008, 01:23 PM Post #30
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jun 5 2008, 01:13 PM Go right ahead. My only suggestion is you research, and THEN come to a conclusion. As we already have and we have the evidence to back it up. That is my plan.... Do not be suprised if my conclusion backs up a part of yours as that is what I am seeing in the preliminary studies.... which still needs to be confirmed.
Posts: 4,150 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · American Flight 77 · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2