| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Air America Pentagon Debate To Feature Pft & Cit!; Thurs May 15, Debate opposition needed | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 13 2008, 04:22 PM (873 Views) | |
| Domenick DiMaggio | May 14 2008, 11:24 PM Post #26 |
|
talk about naive. its not like NIST, ASCE, FEMA, and the 9/11 Commission could be convinced to go along with something untrue like the EPA did in regards to 9/11. Only the EPA can be influenced to go along with "national security" I'm sure. |
![]() |
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | May 14 2008, 11:26 PM Post #27 |
|
i'm not even mentioned you liar. is this bobert? which jrefer are you? eta: cowards Roberts & Weick both backed out of agreed debates with me on Hardfire. Weick twice. Edited by Domenick DiMaggio, May 14 2008, 11:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Craig Ranke CIT | May 14 2008, 11:26 PM Post #28 |
|
You are clearly an antagonist who will be too cowardly to call in tomorrow. Do you deny that the government position is that a 757 was hijacked by members of Al Quada and flown by Hani Hanjour and always remained west of the Potomac River and Pentagon until it flew south of the former citgo, hit 5 light poles, and entered in the building entirely on the bottom floor all the way through to the C-ring of the building without noticeably damaging the first floor slab or lawn out front? |
![]() |
|
| Craig Ranke CIT | May 14 2008, 11:28 PM Post #29 |
|
We have proven the plane that flew tree top level over Arlington timed perfectly with the explosion at the Pentagon did not cause any of the physical damage. |
![]() |
|
| Craig Ranke CIT | May 14 2008, 11:31 PM Post #30 |
|
Oh no it's definitely not bobert! This guy at least knows how to compose a full sentence. Probably 16.5 or someone like that. |
![]() |
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | May 14 2008, 11:35 PM Post #31 |
|
good point. although he is stupid enough to post a link without even reading what's at the site he linked to. someone must have their hand up his you know what.
|
![]() |
|
| Craig Ranke CIT | May 15 2008, 12:02 AM Post #32 |
|
Just the typical empty posturing. They all do it. It's all they have. |
![]() |
|
| Craig Ranke CIT | May 15 2008, 01:45 AM Post #33 |
|
Gosh. After you were apparently "posting" for hours we get nothing but spam from your God Gravy who is too much of a coward to debate us? Why am I not surprised. Good night. Let me know how you like the show tomorrow. |
![]() |
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | May 15 2008, 02:17 AM Post #34 |
|
who writes your posts for you? |
![]() |
|
| Gideon524 | May 15 2008, 03:21 AM Post #35 |
|
Oh, you didn't know?
|
Stasis, I deleted your spam posts because once is enough. Spam the forums again with the same posts over and over and you will be banned. It's put up or shut up time for the skeptics. Good luck CIT and P4T against the two or three skeptics that might call in tonight. Now doubt they'll, instead, sit behind their monitors posting things in their "cool people forum" like "Mystery Science Theatre 3000 featuring Loose Change" instead of calling in to debate the facts and the lies we're being fed. Who wants to start taking bets about how many skeptics actually have the huevos to call in? Edited by Gideon524, May 15 2008, 03:38 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Aldo Marquis CIT | May 15 2008, 09:35 AM Post #36 |
![]()
|
What is the "real world"? You and your cult of "critical thinkers"? Everyone claims they have "exposed" us. So many people are trying to "expose" us. Why is that? We only spoke with witnesses and corroborated their very CLEAR and VERY ADAMANT statements. If we are nuts and irrational and illogical, why do you continue to do bother with us? Why do you spend so much energy making sock accounts trying to convince everyone, possibly even yourself, that what we, no scratch that-the witnesses are saying is not true? Why can't you find one of your "expert" debunkers to come on and debate us on the issue? Instead they cowardly quote mine out of context comments and try to character assasinate. The "real world" will be laughing at you guys tonight. I can assure you of that. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, May 15 2008, 02:00 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| look-up | May 15 2008, 10:19 AM Post #37 |
|
. I think that's enough to show us that you have your cerebrum in a stasis field, and are not here to debate, but only to insult and ridicule. You are now confined to the skeptics area. This thread, since it exists mostly to debate with skeptics, will be moved to the skeptics area so that all of the skeptics who wish to hurl insults at you can still participate and continue to show their immaturity. If you want to post a link to the show once it is up for us all to hear, feel free to start another thread. AND GOOD Luck!! |
![]() |
|
| JFK | May 15 2008, 11:03 AM Post #38 |
|
LOL.. Sounds as if they are getting desperate.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=113763 |
![]() |
|
| Aldo Marquis CIT | May 15 2008, 02:02 PM Post #39 |
![]()
|
16.5 (His IQ), John Farmer and Frustrated Fraud are not 9/11 truthers. They do not have ONE PIECE of accurate or truthful information that refutes anything CIT has brought forward. I dare you to abandon your cowardice, come here, and post something from their blogs that disproves our evidence. |
![]() |
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | May 15 2008, 03:10 PM Post #40 |
|
apparently they are jref'ers or at least very popular among jref'ers which i suppose makes them jref. i know adam was getting along pleasantly with the traitors over there in the thread about tonights show. |
![]() |
|
| JFK | May 15 2008, 05:35 PM Post #41 |
|
Stasis is suspended for 7 days for spamming this thread. |
![]() |
|
| hbgtruth | May 15 2008, 05:43 PM Post #42 |
|
One accomplishment over a 5+ year time span? ... Impressive And what is your explanation for this "proof" going unnoticed by authorities and the media that you've secretly presented it to? |
![]() |
|
| William Rea | May 15 2008, 05:45 PM Post #43 |
|
"Talk about naive. Look in the mirror." Post#17 this thread. "Meanwhile..... Back in the real world" Post #18 this thread. "I hope you all will soon realize how irrational you guys are. It's rather sad to see so many people delude themselves with your completely illogical thinking and irrationality. After all these years you still don't understand why the real world just laughs at you." Post #18 this thread. Hmm, doesn't matter how much you tried to veil it, and I can see that you did try, they are still insults and attacks on the person. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






12:30 AM Oct 7