| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Fort Hood - now I know its propaganda! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 8 2009, 10:35 AM (410 Views) | |
| Travis | Nov 8 2009, 10:35 AM Post #1 |
|
Greetings all, I appeal to those who know how the monsters operate. They have started linking Major Nidal Malik Hasan to the 9/11 attackers, this is a red flag considering the true 9/11 conspirators were from elements of US and Israeli intelligence agencies. A major UK paper has made the claim Fort Hood shooting: Texas army killer linked to September 11 terrorists Edited by Travis, Nov 8 2009, 10:36 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| bretwalda | Nov 8 2009, 06:26 PM Post #2 |
|
My BS meter was buzzing as soon as they announced the name. I tried to download as many of the initial articles as I could before they were 'Updated' - I'll post them up here soon in a zip for anyone that want to hold onto them. I don't think this guy had anything to do with it. I have yet to find one identified eyewitness who actually saw him saying the words and shooting the gun. If anyone has one I'd like to see it. |
![]() |
|
| Travis | Nov 9 2009, 05:30 AM Post #3 |
|
Please post your info it may be helpful. |
![]() |
|
| JFK | Nov 9 2009, 09:11 AM Post #4 |
![]()
|
FWIW... From THE GLOBAL REALITY W/JOSH REEVES on November 6th 2009... Edited by JFK, Nov 9 2009, 09:15 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| gunplumber | Nov 9 2009, 03:54 PM Post #5 |
|
Now the talking heads of the MSM are not only saying the alleged suspect tried to contact Al-Qaeda, but also that the attack is "The first major terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11". This whole thing stinks of fear mongering and disinformation. |
![]() |
|
| JFK | Nov 9 2009, 04:38 PM Post #6 |
![]()
|
Citizens for Legitimate Government
|
![]() |
|
| T3QuillAMocKINGbird | Nov 9 2009, 06:21 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
http://worldreports.org/news/244_fort_hood_recovery_of_the_chinese_currency_boxes Think outside the box gang... |
![]() |
|
| bretwalda | Nov 9 2009, 07:33 PM Post #8 |
|
here is it is: 7zip file - the only archive format I had that didn't have a problem with the filenames. Unzip into one folder so it can reference the supporting files correctly. All these files had some pertinent information pertaining to piecing together what really might have happened - timeline of events, shooter identification, locations, etc. As I understand that nbc news clip in the file - there were a total of 4. Edited by bretwalda, Nov 9 2009, 07:34 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Travis | Nov 10 2009, 03:58 AM Post #9 |
|
There's some good info here! What ever happened it is beyond a doubt that this event is being used to further the interests of the monsters. |
![]() |
|
| bretwalda | Nov 11 2009, 01:37 AM Post #10 |
|
Teqilla - I think Story is onto something but it is so batsh^t crazy its hard to even discuss. Veterans day is...today I guess we will see.Do you have any other info on this WANTA fund stuff? Dam that dude pulls a nice fee for his work. |
![]() |
|
| Mumin | Nov 15 2009, 01:01 AM Post #11 |
|
And of all the days to sentence KSM, they picked now.... it's quite a bit of a coincidence that the alleged 9/11 mastermind was thrust back into the news just a week after the first "act of terrorism" since 9/11. |
![]() |
|
| T3QuillAMocKINGbird | Nov 15 2009, 02:42 AM Post #12 |
![]()
|
Agreed... It is really interesting. Also, strange is how 9 Billion was lost in Iraq in hard currency never to be found, so that gives way to theories of inside ops or entanglements in huge proportions that must be occuring to a certain degree. There are more amazing things like this 9 Billion that have no explanation only to leave everyone guessing. Some are just more creative than others... |
![]() |
|
| MartinL | Nov 18 2009, 06:08 PM Post #13 |
|
That article makes him look like a bat shit crazy horny SOB who couldn't get laid or attract a wife he could hide under a veil. The 9/11 connection presented in the article is a fine example of grasping at straws. Another example of bad journalism. |
![]() |
|
| MartinL | Nov 18 2009, 06:13 PM Post #14 |
|
Got that right. That article reads like a cheap novel. Edited by MartinL, Nov 18 2009, 06:25 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| MartinL | Nov 18 2009, 06:36 PM Post #15 |
|
Here is one witness that claims to have seen Hasan shooting. Have not been able to confirm it though. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/bx_witness_relives_end_of_ft_hood_lCHIMl435wmA57wxL6JdyH Why don't you think he had anything to do with it? |
![]() |
|
| Travis | Nov 21 2009, 04:17 PM Post #16 |
|
Besides increasing your posts what's your angle? You seem to suggest the story is BS then you indicate your support it? |
![]() |
|
| MartinL | Nov 21 2009, 05:32 PM Post #17 |
|
I think the 9/11 angle is BS. Dar al-Hijrah mosque is a large one. Finding a few names that are connected is not a big deal. Find another way to connect Hasan, al-Awlaki and the terrorists and it will be a worthy story. I think the reporters are trying to punch up their story more than is needed. What does Hasan's connection with the alleged 9/11 have to do with anything anyway? Isn't it the opinion of most here that arab terrorists were not responsible for the attacks on the WTC? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic » |








I guess we will see.
11:13 PM Nov 24