Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Proof of thermite?; More strong evidence
Topic Started: Apr 28 2008, 10:09 PM (5,895 Views)
JFK
Member Avatar

Posted Image


Posted Image


Posted Image


Posted Image


Posted Image



Source: http://www.enme.umd.edu/%7Emrz/pdf_papers/2004_Adv.Mat._electrostatic_energetic.pdf
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Michal

hold on for a second. there are many buildings with drywall partitions installed inside. There were many fires in such buildings yet I have never heard or seen steel elements of the structure being damaged in the same way as it was in WTCs (note I am a building sureveyor)

anyhow, after viewing LC AC I think we have got it clear now - there were explosives present in the subject buildings ...

and a small note here. The fact that I am not present here on the forum for most of time does not mean I have left the movement and that I do not support it anymore. It is quite opposite. Having more evidence and research done I am more and more convinced that this event was an inside job.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
murphymcmurph

Michal
Nov 18 2009, 11:51 AM
hold on for a second. there are many buildings with drywall partitions installed inside. There were many fires in such buildings yet I have never heard or seen steel elements of the structure being damaged in the same way as it was in WTCs (note I am a building sureveyor)

anyhow, after viewing LC AC I think we have got it clear now - there were explosives present in the subject buildings ...

and a small note here. The fact that I am not present here on the forum for most of time does not mean I have left the movement and that I do not support it anymore. It is quite opposite. Having more evidence and research done I am more and more convinced that this event was an inside job.
where is this proof? please show it to me in a way i can understand.
i want proof before i can believe in a conspiracy.
why do people on this forum get banned for putting up an argument?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miragememories
Member Avatar

murphymcmurph
 
"where is this proof? please show it to me in a way i can understand."

If you want an intelligent response to your question, ask a complete question which identifies the subject
of your question.

murphymcmurph
 
"i want proof before i can believe in a conspiracy."

Everyone wants proof before believing something, unless you are discussing religion.

There is no shortage of proof if you are willing to look for it.

murphymcmurph
 
"why do people on this forum get banned for putting up an argument? "

They don't.

They get banned for behavior that reveals no intention or interest in pursuing a legitimate discussion.

MM
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Headspin
Member Avatar

murphymcmurph
Nov 23 2009, 08:04 AM
i want proof before i can believe in a conspiracy.
Did you get proof before believing the official story conspiracy involving cave dwellers and box cutters?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
4 users reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
Members: Flippy
« Previous Topic · World Trade Center · Next Topic »
Add Reply