What would it take, Boone?

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

What would it take, Boone?; The C-130 Flight Path
Topic Started: Oct 13 2009, 01:46 PM (437 Views)
Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 13 2009, 01:46 PM Post #1
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Hi Boone, I was just curious... What would it take for you to admit you are wrong about the flight path of the C-130 departing on Camp Springs One DP? What would it take for you to accept that the plane actually departed on the Morningside One DP? What would it take for you to accept that the C-130's flight path "took them by the south side of the mall" giving them a clear view of it? What would it take for you to accept that this flight path that "took them by the south side of the mall" also took them north of Reagan National headed due west? What would you do if we were in possession of evidence that proves this is EXACTLY what the plane did? Would you accept 9/11 as an inside job? Would you accept the RADES radar data and NTSB data as fraudulent? Would you apologize to us? Would you admit I was right this whole time?
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 13 2009, 06:59 PM Post #2
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Boone, come back soon.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 14 2009, 08:38 AM Post #3
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo What would it take for you to admit you are wrong about the flight path of the C-130 departing on Camp Springs One DP? It would take a statement from O'Brien himself claiming that he did not depart out of Andrews on a 270° heading. Quote: What would it take for you to accept that the plane actually departed on the Morningside One DP? Same as above. O'Brien would have to claim that he was assigned an initial heading of 050° before departure. Quote: What would it take for you to accept that the C-130's flight path "took them by the south side of the mall" giving them a clear view of it? I already believe that, just not your version of it. Quote: What would it take for you to accept that this flight path that "took them by the south side of the mall" also took them north of Reagan National headed due west? A clarification from O'Brien or Schumacher. Quote: What would you do if we were in possession of evidence that proves this is EXACTLY what the plane did? I would start a thread in this very sub forum presenting the information I had. Quote: Would you accept 9/11 as an inside job? No. I would accept that this aspect of the story as fraudulent. Quote: Would you accept the RADES radar data and NTSB data as fraudulent? Same as above. Quote: Would you apologize to us? No, but I would admit that I was wrong. Quote: Would you admit I was right this whole time? Yes, on this aspect of the argument.
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


roundhead	Oct 14 2009, 12:05 PM Post #4
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08	So Boone is basically saying its OK to lie about some things, but we should blindly trust other stuff rolled out by the same people as Gospel. UH......hMMM Sceptic much???? To me, liars are people that lie. If they lie they are liars.But that is just me.
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 14 2009, 02:35 PM Post #5
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Quote: Quote: What would you do if we were in possession of evidence that proves this is EXACTLY what the plane did? I would start a thread in this very sub forum presenting the information I had. I didn't say what would you do if YOU were in possession of such evidence. Read it again and please answer. Quote: Quote: Would you accept 9/11 as an inside job? No. I would accept that this aspect of the story as fraudulent. Quote: Would you accept the RADES radar data and NTSB data as fraudulent? Same as above. Well if you would admit the data is fraudulent how can this be without 9/11 being an inside job? Can you please elaborate? Do you have a conspiracy theory of some sort to explain this? Quote: Quote: Would you apologize to us? No, but I would admit that I was wrong. You wouldn't apologize to us and 9/11 truthseekers for all the valuable time you wasted? For all the doubt you caused when you could have helped in this matter? Quote: Quote: Would you admit I was right this whole time? Yes, on this aspect of the argument. Sweeet ...that is if I actually was in possession of evidence that proves this. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Oct 14 2009, 02:48 PM.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 14 2009, 06:11 PM Post #6
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo I didn't say what would you do if YOU were in possession of such evidence. Read it again and please answer. I would say lay it out on the table. Quote: Well if you would admit the data is fraudulent how can this be without 9/11 being an inside job? Can you please elaborate? Hypothetically speaking, of course. If the C-130 had actually departed on a 250° heading instead of a 270° heading, does not mean that 'the towers were brought down with super nanothermate.‘ Quote: You wouldn't apologize to us and 9/11 truthseekers for all the valuable time you wasted? For all the doubt you caused when you could have helped in this matter? My answer is the same as the first time you asked. I haven't completely wasted your valuable time, Aldo. You would still be thinking that GOFER 06 made a left-hand turn to follow Flight 77 and you would also still think that he flew "over the tidal basin."
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 14 2009, 06:34 PM Post #7
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Quote: Quote: Well if you would admit the data is fraudulent how can this be without 9/11 being an inside job? Can you please elaborate? Hypothetically speaking, of course. If the C-130 had actually departed on a 250° heading instead of a 270° heading, does not mean that 'the towers were brought down with super nanothermate.‘ Well please, elaborate. What would it mean then? Quote: Quote: You wouldn't apologize to us and 9/11 truthseekers for all the valuable time you wasted? For all the doubt you caused when you could have helped in this matter? My answer is the same as the first time you asked. I haven't completely wasted your valuable time, Aldo. You would still be thinking that GOFER 06 made a left-hand turn to follow Flight 77 and you would also still think that he flew "over the tidal basin." Oh please, the left had turn was hypothetical and you had nothing to do with it, Boone. We realized it would make more sense for them to follow the plane since it was heading to DC. And you had nothing with the Tidal Basin issue. Scott Cook brought that on and there was no evidence to the contrary until the ANC witnesses and the Tribby video. But I understand, you want to feel important and you certainly want to feel that those comments agitate us. Wrong.....again. We'll be seein ya Boone.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 14 2009, 06:55 PM Post #8
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Well please, elaborate. What would it mean then? Aldo, none of this matters because the data is not fraudulent. Quote: Oh please, the left had turn was hypothetical and you had nothing to do with it, Boone. We realized it would make more sense for them to follow the plane since it was heading to DC. And you had nothing with the Tidal Basin issue. Scott Cook brought that on and there was no evidence to the contrary until the ANC witnesses and the Tribby video. But I understand, you want to feel important and you certainly want to feel that those comments agitate us. Wrong.....again. I'm not interested in feeling important. Although I am, apparently, important enough for you to start another thread for. All of the credit should go to Pinnacle for getting the Tyson sector transcripts released and Tribby for recording and posting the videos. Quote: We'll be seein ya Boone. We??? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Or, are you and the other half of CIT going to swing by for a beer?
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 14 2009, 07:17 PM Post #9
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Quote: Aldo Well please, elaborate. What would it mean then? Aldo, none of this matters because the data is not fraudulent. Actually it does. Because the data is fraudulent, Boone. Now answer the question, at least hypothetically speaking....for now. Quote: Quote: Oh please, the left had turn was hypothetical and you had nothing to do with it, Boone. We realized it would make more sense for them to follow the plane since it was heading to DC. And you had nothing with the Tidal Basin issue. Scott Cook brought that on and there was no evidence to the contrary until the ANC witnesses and the Tribby video. But I understand, you want to feel important and you certainly want to feel that those comments agitate us. Wrong.....again. I'm not interested in feeling important. Although I am, apparently, important enough for you to start another thread for. Yes, Boone, you are important to me. You are a prime example of someone who was wrong, yet acted as a conduit for disinformation. I feel you should be made an example of especially since YOU were one of our biggest detractors regarding this issue. Quote: All of the credit should go to Pinnacle for getting the Tyson sector transcripts released and Tribby for recording and posting the videos. Pinnacle? Pinnacle was pegged as disinfo long ago when he tried floating the E4B to confuse people. Then when he was called on it, he disappeared. He gets no credit. Especially since there is history or documentation of any of this. Quote: Quote: We'll be seein ya Boone. We??? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Or, are you and the other half of CIT going to swing by for a beer? Yeah we. Me, Craig, the forum members watching this thread.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 14 2009, 08:04 PM Post #10
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Actually it does. Because the data is fraudulent, Boone. Now answer the question, at least hypothetically speaking....for now. Sorry, Aldo, but it's not fraudulent. If it was, however, it would change the location where Flight 77 and GOFER06 crossed flight paths meaning that they (military deceivers) were trying to hide something. Quote: Yes, Boone, you are important to me. Oh stop it Aldo, you're making me blush! Quote: You are a prime example of someone who was wrong, yet acted as a conduit for disinformation. I feel you should be made an example of especially since YOU were one of our biggest detractors regarding this issue Scratch my previous comment. Quote: Pinnacle? Pinnacle was pegged as disinfo long ago when he tried floating the E4B to confuse people. Then when he was called on it, he disappeared. He gets no credit. Especially since there is history or documentation of any of this. But was the transcript any different from the audio recording? Quote: Yeah we. Me, Craig, the forum members watching this thread. I hadn't seen you around for a while and I was starting to think that you hung your Ivy cap up and called it quits. Give Craig a shout out for me, would you? Hi to everyone watching this thread.
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 14 2009, 09:49 PM Post #11
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Quote: Aldo Actually it does. Because the data is fraudulent, Boone. Now answer the question, at least hypothetically speaking....for now. Sorry, Aldo, but it's not fraudulent. Boone, I know this is hard to accept but it is fraudulent. Quote: If it was, however, it would change the location where Flight 77 and GOFER06 crossed flight paths meaning that they (military deceivers) were trying to hide something. haha, but what Boone? What would that mean if they were hiding something? Boone, what would that mean in the context of the anomalous, problematic alleged black box data that is IRRECONCILABLE with an impact, the north side testimony, Roosevelt's sighting, and Lloyde's virtual admission of involvement? Do you not see a pattern here Boone? Quote: Quote: Yes, Boone, you are important to me. Oh stop it Aldo, you're making me blush! You need blood flowing through your veins in order to do that Boone lol. And it's safe to say you are dead in the water. Quote: Quote: You are a prime example of someone who was wrong, yet acted as a conduit for disinformation. I feel you should be made an example of especially since YOU were one of our biggest detractors regarding this issue Scratch my previous comment. At least you can have a sense of humor while being proven wrong. Quote: Quote: Pinnacle? Pinnacle was pegged as disinfo long ago when he tried floating the E4B to confuse people. Then when he was called on it, he disappeared. He gets no credit. Especially since there is history or documentation of any of this. But was the transcript any different from the audio recording? What does any of that have to do with the RADES data and NTSB data being fraudulent? Quote: Quote: Yeah we. Me, Craig, the forum members watching this thread. I hadn't seen you around for a while and I was starting to think that you hung your Ivy cap up and called it quits. No man, I do have a life outside of 9/11. Being a single father and playing in a reggae band takes a lot of time out your schedule. That's funny though, I was thinking the same thing about you, except it was a dunce cap. Quote: Give Craig a shout out for me, would you? Craig, Boone said to give you a shout out? Quote: Hi to everyone watching this thread. Oh yeah everybody, keep watching this thread and Boone. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Oct 14 2009, 09:53 PM.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 14 2009, 10:07 PM Post #12
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo At least you can have a sense of humor while being proven wrong. Do you like my new avatar? I'll reply to the rest later.
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 14 2009, 10:19 PM Post #13
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Boonedoggled Oct 14 2009, 10:07 PM Aldo At least you can have a sense of humor while being proven wrong. Do you like my new avatar? I'll reply to the rest later. Love it. Not as much as your signature though. But that quote is not as good as this one: After having been there myself, I came to the realization that the people who use the Pentagon security videos to prove that Flight 77 leveled off over the lawn, are sadly mistaken. There is no way in Hades that that airplane approached the Pentagon level. Impossible! ~Boondoggled
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 15 2009, 02:21 AM Post #14
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Aldo Boone, what would that mean in the context of the anomalous, problematic alleged black box data that is IRRECONCILABLE with an impact, the north side testimony, Roosevelt's sighting, and Lloyde's virtual admission of involvement? Do you not see a pattern here Boone? Yes, I see a pattern here but I also see a pattern in the Ground Control recording, flight strip, CS1, Andrews/DCA LOA, Tower recording, radar data, and O'Brien's own words. We've been through all this before, do you have anything new to bring into the discussion or are we going to rehash all the old arguments?
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 15 2009, 01:06 PM Post #15
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Quote: Aldo Boone, what would that mean in the context of the anomalous, problematic alleged black box data that is IRRECONCILABLE with an impact, the north side testimony, Roosevelt's sighting, and Lloyde's virtual admission of involvement? Do you not see a pattern here Boone? Yes, I see a pattern here but I also see a pattern in the Ground Control recording, flight strip, CS1, Andrews/DCA LOA, Tower recording, radar data, and O'Brien's own words. Yes... but? The fact that you even ignore the serious contradictions in the official story instead of give the greater credence or attention to it in favor of toeing the official story line and promoting data RELEASED AFTER the contradictions are discovered speaks volumes about you as an American. Quote: We've been through all this before, do you have anything new to bring into the discussion or are we going to rehash all the old arguments? That's right. We have been through this all. At this point, I do not have anything new to bring to the discussion. At this point Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Oct 15 2009, 10:07 PM.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Bitterman	Oct 16 2009, 01:27 AM Post #16
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08	Holy shit Boone. I've been gone 6 months or so, and you're STILL on this??!!? Unfrickin believable. What are you? With everything that is shown here, especially from O'Brien himself........you're still not "convinced". I'm ashamed for you.....look at what you've become. Look at your life. Clearly, you are something......"special". Aldo, you've made your point. This a lost cause. I think I can guess what has been happening whilst I was away. You show all the critical information and Boone sits with his dunce cap on and plugs his ears and shakes head constantly saying "nuh uh! nuh uh! nuh uh!". Is that about the size of it? Its a good thing this whole thing is not based on your opinion, Boone. If this was an argument with facts presented on both sides.......and adults at the table......well, then we'd have your full name like Aldo shows his and your credentials with and maybe even some credibility. Never mind, it will never happen. What a waste of a life.......
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 16 2009, 01:11 PM Post #17
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Don't mind him, Bitterman. At least he has conceded that he would admit that the data was fraudulent if we produced evidence proving it. Boone, if we did produce this type of evidence, would you post it at JREF and alert them to the fact that the data is fraudulent?
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Boonedoggled	Oct 16 2009, 07:47 PM Post #18
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08	Bitterman I'm ashamed for you.....look at what you've become. Look at your life. Clearly, you are something......"special". Thanks, Bitterman. That means a lot coming from such a special person as yourself. Aldo Boone, if we did produce this type of evidence, would you post it at JREF and alert them to the fact that the data is fraudulent? If Steve O'Brien claims that he did not depart Andrews on a 270° heading and did not cross flight paths with Flight 77 where it is shown to be in the FAA/RADES returns, I will post it at JREF.
Posts: 228 Group: Members Member #51 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 18 2009, 01:01 AM Post #19
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Boone, why do you make it so specific?
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Oct 22 2009, 01:35 PM Post #20
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Oct 18 2009, 01:01 AM Boone, why do you make it so specific?
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »