Hoodwinked at Shanksville: Fairy Tail

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
…
5
6

Hoodwinked at Shanksville: Fairy Tail
Topic Started: Apr 24 2008, 11:30 PM (1,974 Views)
Killtown	May 15 2008, 11:42 AM Post #126
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	tharg May 14 2008, 06:12 PM 1) The Quote: faint "Wile E. Coyote" impression of itself in the grass is a lovely way to describe part of the scene of the deaths of the passengers of flight 93. I hope you feel real proud. 2) No killtown, its generally accepted that flight 93 impacted in that crater, therefore unless you have other evidence to the contrary, so did the landing gear. Can you produce any evidence of it not being found there? 3) If not, then you are just playing sick games with dead people and their families. Why do that Killtown? 1) Now, answer my question (unless you are scared to). 2) YOUR claim, YOU prove. Put up, or shut up. 3) I.E.: "I can't debunk your claims, so I have to resort to JFUCK tactic #2: play the 'you're insensitive' card."



tharg	May 15 2008, 02:24 PM Post #127
Posts: 87 Group: BANNED! Member #303 Joined: 02/11/08	Provide some evidence that the landing gear wasnt in the crater. Otherwise I will just have to presume it was. That would be the logical place for the landing gear to impact and unless you have secret evidence of it being found elsewhere having bounced out, then you are wasting your time with this line of argument.
Posts: 87 Group: BANNED! Member #303 Joined: 02/11/08


Killtown	May 15 2008, 03:43 PM Post #128
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	tharg May 15 2008, 02:24 PM Provide some evidence that the landing gear wasnt in the crater. Otherwise I will just have to presume it was. That would be the logical place for the landing gear to impact and unless you have secret evidence of it being found elsewhere having bounced out, then you are wasting your time with this line of argument. To not derail this thread, back up your landing gear claim here: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/278097/ Now, please describe your theory how 93's vert stab struck that soft patch of soil so hard that it essentially obliterated off of it, but it only left a faint near-perfect impression of itself.



Killtown	May 18 2008, 01:10 PM Post #129
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Skeptics, do you concede the vert tail mark in the ground was staged and no 757 tail section hit the ground there?



Killtown	May 25 2008, 12:49 AM Post #130
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Hello, skeptics? Can't admit defeat?



Killtown	May 30 2008, 03:21 AM Post #131
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Oh Skeptics? Edited by Killtown, May 30 2008, 03:22 AM.



Killtown	Jun 16 2008, 01:34 AM Post #132
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Do skeptics concede that a 757's tail section can't crash, leave a faint near-perfect imprint of itself in the grass, then disappear?



Killtown	Jun 22 2008, 08:23 PM Post #133
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08



JFK	Jun 22 2008, 09:23 PM Post #134
Posts: 2,523 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Grasshoppers ?
Posts: 2,523 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


noeffects	Jul 8 2008, 02:00 PM Post #135
Posts: 231 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	That video is too good . that song is catchy as well
Posts: 231 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


x1975	Jul 9 2008, 04:28 AM Post #136
closed mind Posts: 71 Group: BANNED! Member #725 Joined: 07/09/08	If you can't explain it then it didn't happen? Is that what passes for logic in the truther cult?



x1975	Jul 9 2008, 04:34 AM Post #137
closed mind Posts: 71 Group: BANNED! Member #725 Joined: 07/09/08	Exactly what are the scientific and objective data for defining "faint" and "soft"?



Killtown	Jul 10 2008, 01:56 AM Post #138
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	noeffects Jul 8 2008, 02:00 PM That video is too good . that song is catchy as well My, thank you. It is until you hear it 1,000 from editing the video.



Killtown	Jul 10 2008, 01:59 AM Post #139
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	x1975 Jul 9 2008, 04:34 AM Exactly what are the scientific and objective data for defining "faint" and "soft"? Oh great, another skeptic troll. So tell us "open minded/unbiased" skeptic, how did the tail disappear after striking at the reported 580mph but only leave an impression of it in the grass as if someone just lowered the tail down and it made a near-exact impression of itself from its own weight?



x1975	Jul 10 2008, 09:17 PM Post #140
closed mind Posts: 71 Group: BANNED! Member #725 Joined: 07/09/08	Killtown Jul 10 2008, 01:59 AM x1975 Jul 9 2008, 04:34 AM Exactly what are the scientific and objective data for defining "faint" and "soft"? Oh great, another skeptic troll. So tell us "open minded/unbiased" skeptic, how did the tail disappear after striking at the reported 580mph but only leave an impression of it in the grass as if someone just lowered the tail down and it made a near-exact impression of itself from its own weight? 580 MPH????? I think it was 482 or 484? How deep is that "impression in the grass"? What do you mean disappear??? If I take your computer and smash it with a sledge hammer into little pieces do you then think it "disappeared"?



Killtown	Jul 11 2008, 11:48 AM Post #141
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	x1975 Jul 10 2008, 09:17 PM 1) 580 MPH????? I think it was 482 or 484? 2) How deep is that "impression in the grass"? 3) What do you mean disappear??? If I take your computer and smash it with a sledge hammer into little pieces do you then think it "disappeared"? 1) Think again: Quote: "the aircraft plowed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 580 miles per hour" - CNN & 9/11 Commission "The aircraft struck the earth at 580 mph outside Shanksville" - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 2) It didn't penetrate through the ground. Don't you agree? 3) OK, show me "little pieces" of the tail section. There is a rubber tire burning on top of the crater, so surely a noticeable piece of the tail survived too. Edited by Killtown, Jul 11 2008, 11:50 AM.



x1975	Jul 14 2008, 08:41 AM Post #142
closed mind Posts: 71 Group: BANNED! Member #725 Joined: 07/09/08	Killtown Jul 11 2008, 11:48 AM x1975 Jul 10 2008, 09:17 PM 1) 580 MPH????? I think it was 482 or 484? 2) How deep is that "impression in the grass"? 3) What do you mean disappear??? If I take your computer and smash it with a sledge hammer into little pieces do you then think it "disappeared"? 1) Think again: Quote: "the aircraft plowed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 580 miles per hour" - CNN & 9/11 Commission "The aircraft struck the earth at 580 mph outside Shanksville" - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 2) It didn't penetrate through the ground. Don't you agree? 3) OK, show me "little pieces" of the tail section. There is a rubber tire burning on top of the crater, so surely a noticeable piece of the tail survived too. What was the speed as indicated by the FDR? 580? So if I can't show which little piece of debris in the photos is from the tail section then you think no plane crashed there - that's fairly childish. As for the tire - rubber tires don't break apart upon impact.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
…
5
6