Hoodwinked at Shanksville: Fairy Tail

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2
…
6

Hoodwinked at Shanksville: Fairy Tail
Topic Started: Apr 24 2008, 11:30 PM (1,975 Views)
Killtown	Apr 24 2008, 11:30 PM Post #1
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	(9:57 min video) http://hoodwinkedatshanksville.blogspot.com/2008/04/fairy-tail.html No Tail = No Plane Edited by Killtown, Apr 25 2008, 03:31 PM.



Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 03:02 AM Post #2
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Skeptics, if you are unable to explain the oddity of the lack-of-a 757 tail section at the Shanks "crash" scene along with the faint "Wile E. Coyote" 2/3 tail impression in the "soft soil," don't worry. I can't explain it either. Edited by Killtown, Apr 26 2008, 03:04 AM.



Domenick DiMaggio	Apr 26 2008, 12:31 PM Post #3
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Bravo! Excellent analysis of the history channel footage of the crater!
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


noeffects	Apr 26 2008, 12:34 PM Post #4
Posts: 231 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	Great Job Killtown. !!!
Posts: 231 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


noeffects	Apr 26 2008, 12:37 PM Post #5
Posts: 231 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	You should also copy this on the Shanksville or flight 93 sections.
Posts: 231 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 01:12 PM Post #6
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Thanks guys. Feel free to repost it in the other sections. I'm just waiting for what the JFERs have to say about it . . . and it didn't take long for some high quality responses: Quote: Pardalis - 40 people died in that crash. DGM - If Killtowns names on it it's BS. That didn't take that long. Why don't you start thinking for yourself and stop believing every piece of BS your cult throws at you? Wow, they really debunked my video! Edited by Killtown, Apr 26 2008, 01:12 PM.



Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 01:42 PM Post #7
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	are you saying that the tail section of a plane always survives every plane crash?
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 01:55 PM Post #8
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 01:42 PM are you saying that the tail section of a plane always survives every plane crash? No.



Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 02:04 PM Post #9
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	are you saying the tail should have survived the crash?
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 03:00 PM Post #10
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 02:04 PM are you saying the tail should have survived the crash? "Survived" is a relative term, but no, not necessarily. You should probably watch the entire video before asking questions.



Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 03:12 PM Post #11
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	left stabiliser detached before impact?
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


sap-guy	Apr 26 2008, 03:14 PM Post #12
Posts: 127 Group: Skeptics Member #133 Joined: 01/19/08	Killtown Apr 26 2008, 01:55 PM Headspin Apr 26 2008, 01:42 PM are you saying that the tail section of a plane always survives every plane crash? No. "Skeptics, if you are unable to explain the oddity of the lack-of-a 757 tail section at the Shanks "crash" scene ...." Uhh .. you yourself are not expecting it to survive, yet you're asking others to explain why it didn't ??
Posts: 127 Group: Skeptics Member #133 Joined: 01/19/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Apr 26 2008, 03:32 PM Post #13
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:12 PM left stabiliser detached before impact? got a better explanation for that anomaly?
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 03:43 PM Post #14
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	anyone seen the tail section from Pan AM 103 ?
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Apr 26 2008, 03:49 PM Post #15
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:43 PM anyone seen the tail section from Pan AM 103 ? what happened to the tail section of pan am 103?
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 03:51 PM Post #16
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	Domenick DiMaggio CIT Apr 26 2008, 03:49 PM Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:43 PM anyone seen the tail section from Pan AM 103 ? what happened to the tail section of pan am 103? I think you are looking at it in the photo
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Apr 26 2008, 03:53 PM Post #17
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:51 PM Domenick DiMaggio CIT Apr 26 2008, 03:49 PM Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:43 PM anyone seen the tail section from Pan AM 103 ? what happened to the tail section of pan am 103? I think you are looking at it in the photo You "think"?
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Apr 26 2008, 03:57 PM Post #18
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	You do know the plane depressurized which is a little different than crashing on the ground and that the tail sections was recovered and reconstructed during the investigation and that there was more than 1 debris field, right?
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 04:33 PM Post #19
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:12 PM left stabiliser detached before impact? What happened to it afterward then?



Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 04:36 PM Post #20
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	sap-guy Apr 26 2008, 03:14 PM Killtown Apr 26 2008, 01:55 PM Headspin Apr 26 2008, 01:42 PM are you saying that the tail section of a plane always survives every plane crash? No. "Skeptics, if you are unable to explain the oddity of the lack-of-a 757 tail section at the Shanks "crash" scene ...." Uhh .. you yourself are not expecting it to survive, yet you're asking others to explain why it didn't ?? It looks like that when you QUOTE MINE me. (Don't you JFERs always bitch about us quote mining???) Here is the non-quote mine version: "Skeptics, if you are unable to explain the oddity of the lack-of-a 757 tail section at the Shanks "crash" scene along with the faint "Wile E. Coyote" 2/3 tail impression in the "soft soil," don't worry. I can't explain it either." Edited by Killtown, Apr 26 2008, 04:38 PM.



Killtown	Apr 26 2008, 04:37 PM Post #21
Childish Hypocrite Posts: 701 Group: BANNED! Member #208 Joined: 01/24/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:43 PM anyone seen the tail section from Pan AM 103 ? Those 2 crashes are apples and oranges if the "Flight 93 crash" is legit.



Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 04:44 PM Post #22
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	Domenick DiMaggio CIT Apr 26 2008, 03:57 PM You do know the plane depressurized which is a little different than crashing on the ground and that the tail sections was recovered and reconstructed during the investigation and that there was more than 1 debris field, right? show me a photo of the "tail sections reconstructed"
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 04:47 PM Post #23
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	Killtown Apr 26 2008, 04:37 PM Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:43 PM anyone seen the tail section from Pan AM 103 ? Those 2 crashes are apples and oranges if the "Flight 93 crash" is legit. why is 103 apples and 93 oranges?
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Headspin	Apr 26 2008, 04:51 PM Post #24
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08	Killtown Apr 26 2008, 04:33 PM Headspin Apr 26 2008, 03:12 PM left stabiliser detached before impact? What happened to it afterward then? I don't know. what do you think happened to it if it detached before impact?
Posts: 773 Group: Members Member #252 Joined: 01/31/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Apr 26 2008, 05:03 PM Post #25
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Headspin Apr 26 2008, 04:44 PM Domenick DiMaggio CIT Apr 26 2008, 03:57 PM You do know the plane depressurized which is a little different than crashing on the ground and that the tail sections was recovered and reconstructed during the investigation and that there was more than 1 debris field, right? show me a photo of the "tail sections reconstructed" NYTimes Reported it on 12/24/89 Quote: By spring, British experts had patched the shards into grisly re-creations of the tail section, the forward passenger and baggage area, and the metal cargo container that had held the bomb, as they appeared the instant after the explosion. The reconstruction showed that the lethal cargo had been in a container filled with luggage from Frankfurt and from connecting flights to Pan Am there. And here's a pic of Pan Am 103 being reconstructed : If you have a reason to believe the reconstruction is fake or the NYTimes is being deceptive in their reporting of the reconstruction I would like to hear it.
Posts: 1,231 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
…
6