What was that white wingless aircraft doing?

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

What was that white wingless aircraft doing?; flying over Susan McElwain's car
Topic Started: Sep 27 2009, 07:24 PM (297 Views)
ToS	Sep 27 2009, 07:24 PM Post #1
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	seconds before the alleged Flight 93 crash and flying from the opposite direction? The one she said had a "military look"? That she couldn't find one like it on the internet? That looked to be a one-piece monocoque design with no rivets? That she says was mostly likely a missile or UAV? That the FBI took so serious that they rushed out two agents to try to convince her that she really saw a 757? What was that UAV doing in the area right before the alleged crash?
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


Domenick DiMaggio	Sep 28 2009, 01:54 AM Post #2
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	and why didn't she notice a massive 757 nose diving out of the sky from an alleged thousands of feet less than a mile in front of her?
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


HeadLikeARock	Sep 28 2009, 06:36 AM Post #3
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08	I wouldn't be surprised if Flight 93 was shot down. (Playing Devil's advocate):- Whether the alleged UAV had anything to do with it is open to question, but not impossible. I suspect a manned fighter intercept would be more likely. I don't see any advantage to using a drone, regardless of wether the intercept was pre-planned or not. If it's pre-planned, why not just remote Flight 93 into the turf, as presumably they did with WTC1 and WTC2. If it wasn't a false flag attack, and FLight 93 was shot down, I can understand why the powers that be would want that hushed up (protecting a fragile American collectively battered psyche).
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Sep 28 2009, 07:13 PM Post #4
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	this is called : smoking gun eyewitness testimony
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Toriac	Sep 28 2009, 07:23 PM Post #5
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09	ToS Sep 27 2009, 07:24 PM seconds before the alleged Flight 93 crash and flying from the opposite direction? The one she said had a "military look"? That she couldn't find one like it on the internet? That looked to be a one-piece monocoque design with no rivets? That she says was mostly likely a missile or UAV? That the FBI took so serious that they rushed out two agents to try to convince her that she really saw a 757? What was that UAV doing in the area right before the alleged crash? Why can't she just be wrong or mistaken or didn't get a good look or wouldn't know a samll plane from a757 or is an attention seeker? Why do you want to believe things that are impossible because one person says they saw a plane they couldn't identify? That is incredible to me. Because she saw a white plane the phone calls had to be faked?
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09


JFK	Sep 28 2009, 07:35 PM Post #6
Posts: 4,165 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Toriac Sep 28 2009, 07:23 PM ToS Sep 27 2009, 07:24 PM seconds before the alleged Flight 93 crash and flying from the opposite direction? The one she said had a "military look"? That she couldn't find one like it on the internet? That looked to be a one-piece monocoque design with no rivets? That she says was mostly likely a missile or UAV? That the FBI took so serious that they rushed out two agents to try to convince her that she really saw a 757? What was that UAV doing in the area right before the alleged crash? Why can't she just be wrong or mistaken or didn't get a good look or wouldn't know a samll plane from a757 or is an attention seeker? Why do you want to believe things that are impossible because one person says they saw a plane they couldn't identify? That is incredible to me. Because she saw a white plane the phone calls had to be faked? The only attention seeker here is you Toriac.
Posts: 4,165 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Toriac	Sep 28 2009, 07:45 PM Post #7
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09	JFK Sep 28 2009, 07:35 PM Toriac Sep 28 2009, 07:23 PM ToS Sep 27 2009, 07:24 PM seconds before the alleged Flight 93 crash and flying from the opposite direction? The one she said had a "military look"? That she couldn't find one like it on the internet? That looked to be a one-piece monocoque design with no rivets? That she says was mostly likely a missile or UAV? That the FBI took so serious that they rushed out two agents to try to convince her that she really saw a 757? What was that UAV doing in the area right before the alleged crash? Why can't she just be wrong or mistaken or didn't get a good look or wouldn't know a samll plane from a757 or is an attention seeker? Why do you want to believe things that are impossible because one person says they saw a plane they couldn't identify? That is incredible to me. Because she saw a white plane the phone calls had to be faked? The only attention seeker here is you Toriac. I just thank God that our court system doesn't work this way.
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09


Domenick DiMaggio	Sep 28 2009, 07:53 PM Post #8
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Toriac Sep 28 2009, 07:23 PM ToS Sep 27 2009, 07:24 PM seconds before the alleged Flight 93 crash and flying from the opposite direction? The one she said had a "military look"? That she couldn't find one like it on the internet? That looked to be a one-piece monocoque design with no rivets? That she says was mostly likely a missile or UAV? That the FBI took so serious that they rushed out two agents to try to convince her that she really saw a 757? What was that UAV doing in the area right before the alleged crash? Why can't she just be wrong because shes not...... Quote: or mistaken because shes not..... Quote: Why can't she just be wrong because she isn't..... Quote: or didn't get a good look because she did...... Quote: or wouldn't know a samll plane from a757 because she knows the difference. i even showed her pictures. unlike you, she isn't a fucking idiot..... Quote: or is an attention seeker? why because she called 911 and told them???? Quote: Why do you want to believe things that are impossible because one person says they saw a plane they couldn't identify? well susan mcelwain is one person but viola saylor saw it too. so did rick chaney. so have a few other people that i have spoken with. in fact, i do believe this quote truly sums it up : dale browning : "Everybody's seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is." but i've already named 3 other people who corroborate mrs. mcelwain. Quote: That is incredible to me. Because she saw a white plane the phone calls had to be faked? what? phone calls? what the fuck do phone calls have to do with it???? absolutely nothing. whether a plane crashed in shanksville or not has nothing to do with authenticity of any phone calls. i will not allow you to drive this discussion off topic. Edited by Domenick DiMaggio, Sep 28 2009, 07:54 PM.
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


ToS	Sep 28 2009, 08:25 PM Post #9
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	Toriac Sep 28 2009, 07:23 PM or is an attention seeker? You calling her a liar?
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


ToS	Sep 29 2009, 03:23 PM Post #10
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	So skeptics, what was that white wingless aircraft doing near the official crash spot seconds before the alleged crash?
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


Toriac	Sep 29 2009, 06:31 PM Post #11
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09	ToS Sep 29 2009, 03:23 PM So skeptics, what was that white wingless aircraft doing near the official crash spot seconds before the alleged crash? How do we know there was a white wingless jet? Why try for 8yrs to discredit Lloyd England, but take every word she says as fact?
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09


Domenick DiMaggio	Sep 29 2009, 11:42 PM Post #12
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Toriac Sep 29 2009, 06:31 PM ToS Sep 29 2009, 03:23 PM So skeptics, what was that white wingless aircraft doing near the official crash spot seconds before the alleged crash? How do we know there was a white wingless jet? Why try for 8yrs to discredit Lloyd England, but take every word she says as fact? no one corroborates lloyde englands fairy tale. but viola saylor saw the little white plane too. so did rick chaney. so have a few other people that i have spoken with. in fact, i do believe this quote truly sums it up : dale browning : "Everybody's seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is." and everyone of them confirms it wasn't a corporate jet. i know. i've talked or met with them. this isn't just 1 person.
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Toriac	Sep 30 2009, 10:37 AM Post #13
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09	Domenick DiMaggio Sep 29 2009, 11:42 PM Toriac Sep 29 2009, 06:31 PM ToS Sep 29 2009, 03:23 PM So skeptics, what was that white wingless aircraft doing near the official crash spot seconds before the alleged crash? How do we know there was a white wingless jet? Why try for 8yrs to discredit Lloyd England, but take every word she says as fact? no one corroborates lloyde englands fairy tale. but viola saylor saw the little white plane too. so did rick chaney. so have a few other people that i have spoken with. in fact, i do believe this quote truly sums it up : dale browning : "Everybody's seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is." and everyone of them confirms it wasn't a corporate jet. i know. i've talked or met with them. this isn't just 1 person. It was the white corporate jet that ATC asked to tell them what he could see at the crash site. He flew around the smoking area and reported to ATC what he saw. You can't seriously think that a few people who saw a white plane saw a different white plane? They saw this plane.
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09


Domenick DiMaggio	Sep 30 2009, 03:56 PM Post #14
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	Toriac Sep 30 2009, 10:37 AM It was the white corporate jet that ATC asked to tell them what he could see at the crash site. He flew around the smoking area and reported to ATC what he saw. You can't seriously think that a few people who saw a white plane saw a different white plane? They saw this plane. thank god this asshole is banned. he didn't see the white plane. he doesn't live in shanksville. he has never spoken to someone who does. despite this and the fact he claimed he was open minded he knew that the corporate jet was there and that was what people saw because thats what authority told him. another troll jrefer........
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


JFK	Oct 31 2009, 01:08 PM Post #15
Posts: 4,165 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Domenick DiMaggio Sep 28 2009, 07:13 PM this is called : smoking gun eyewitness testimony This is interesting... http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/10/x-plane/
Posts: 4,165 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


onesliceshort	Oct 31 2009, 04:17 PM Post #16
Posts: 7 Group: Members Member #1,409 Joined: 10/02/09	If proof were ever needed that the media played a part (and still does) in the cover-up, it´s the fact that this lady has been totally ignored because her story doesn´t ´fit´. In the video she is visibly shaken. Why the hell would she make this up??? Typical duhbunker explanation. She is an ´attention seeker´ or ´mistaken´...Jeez...
Posts: 7 Group: Members Member #1,409 Joined: 10/02/09


Domenick DiMaggio	Oct 31 2009, 05:08 PM Post #17
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	JFK Oct 31 2009, 01:08 PM This is interesting... agreed. seems more and more uav's are fitting the descriptions mrs. mcelwain and others gave 8 years ago. i still suspect the one in shanksville was militarized in some way though.
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Oct 31 2009, 05:10 PM Post #18
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	onesliceshort Oct 31 2009, 04:17 PM If proof were ever needed that the media played a part (and still does) in the cover-up, it´s the fact that this lady has been totally ignored because her story doesn´t ´fit´. In the video she is visibly shaken. Why the hell would she make this up??? Typical duhbunker explanation. She is an ´attention seeker´ or ´mistaken´...Jeez... perhaps further proof can be seen in the way many of the 'alternative' media have failed to cover it as well? especially when her account has been corroborated by others.
Posts: 1,979 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »