| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Do You Believe In Majick ? ...9/11 Astrological/Occult; ...Beyond coincidental | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 17 2009, 12:27 PM (321 Views) | |
| noeffects | Sep 17 2009, 12:27 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Be patient..there is some very interesting things discussed here... |
![]() |
|
| tower | Sep 17 2009, 03:10 PM Post #2 |
![]()
|
1:40 - claim that the Giza pyramids reflect the Orion's Belt - first put forward by Robert Bauval in 1995, only holds if you rotate and scale the pyramids. 2:19 - I like how the narrator states that modern astrology checks even the position of Pluto, as if it meant anything 3:32 - "Illuminati symbolism" - you just said it's Masonic 4:47 - claim that by removing the bases of the triangles in Star of David one can get the square and compass of Freemasonry, which is completely unsupported by any source, and seeing how each Lodge is free to interpret the rituals as they see fit or that if you freely remove parts of something you can easily get whatever symbol you want, I don't think the argument has any real value 4:59 - no info on the "god of reflections" from Google. 5:56 - spin - unsourced claim on the importance of bodies of water and automatic assignment of any body of water in front of some structure to esoterics instead of just "it looks nice" 6:30 - "can we conclude that the Illuminati and their so-called "great work" is to mimic their ancient Egyptian masters?" - no, because you have yet to prove where exactly the Bavarian Illuminati fit into all of this 7:08 - "Washington D.C. was built in accordance with hermetic principles" - even if - so what? 7:30 - more geometry, still I can't see how that has any importance 7:50 - claim that during 9/11 there was an alignment between "important" astrological bodies - so what? What does it matter? There are billions of billions of astronomical bodies in the universe, on any given date at any given time some two are bound to be "in alignment", whatever "alignment" means outside of "we just assign significance to something insignificant" 8:04 - Saturn and Pluto forming an "aspect" of "opposition" - planets have no "aspects", they do not "oppose", they simply are. If you're going to arbitrarily assign some meaning to anything you choose, you're bound to finish with something satisfying, because you've put it in there. It's pareidolia. 8:17 - meaningless drivel about Saturn's assigned significance 8:25 - more astrology 8:45 - even more astrology 9:27 - spin based on previous nonsensical assumptions 9:46 - notions of Illuminatis performing human sacrifice rituals, with no regard to giving a source for the supposition that they ever performed ritual sacrifice 9:52 - "Do you believe in magick?" I won't even bother watching the rest. Here's an idea - listen to some John Lennon. |
![]() |
|
| noeffects | Sep 17 2009, 03:29 PM Post #3 |
![]()
|
you don't sound very patient....that's ok. I'm not into the whole horoscope thing either, but I love synchromysticism. I would say take all this with a grain of salt.. but the end of part two is pretty crazy and that is why I watched the whole thing. |
![]() |
|
| Q | Sep 18 2009, 08:19 AM Post #4 |
|
A Higher Evolution
|
There is no scaling and rotation necessary. Winding the Earth-clock back by about 10,000 years achieves an optical alignment with the Stellar light shafts in the top of each Pyramid--co-incidentally, the Age of Leo and coincidentally, there's the Sphynx nearby, which shows signs of having been water-damaged and repaired long before the Pyramids themselves were built. Now, if we can work out how to gain access to the Viking ship Hermetically buried in the vicinity of the "Great" Pyramid, we may learn a thing or two. BTW, no effects, adding a "k" to the word magic does NOT increase its significance or authority. It just makes the people who do it look like KooKs. EDIT: The PRACTICE of "magic" is telekinesis, which can be developed by mental exercises. There is nothing "mysterious" about it. I have achieved TK on several occasions, but never succeeded in TP. Edited by Q, Sep 18 2009, 08:23 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| noeffects | Sep 18 2009, 08:37 AM Post #5 |
![]()
|
Q, I did not create this videos and if you would read the title displayed on the video... it is the proper name for this series...I did not add a "k" ...what I did was a function called copy and paste...it is quite popular...lol. Anyway did anyone at least watch the last few minutes of the 2nd video ? |
![]() |
|
| mid life rethinker | Sep 18 2009, 09:14 AM Post #6 |
![]()
|
I did. Now I'm trying to find the whole !oth Kingdom Video. Weird. I discount nothing. |
![]() |
|
| tower | Sep 18 2009, 09:46 AM Post #7 |
![]()
|
Only it doesn't. http://www.antiquityofman.com/openlettertobauvalandhancock.html
What are you talking about?
No you haven't. There is no such things as telekinesis. If you think you have telekinetic power, feel welcome to prove the world's scientists wrong (and you get a million dollars too). |
![]() |
|
| noeffects | Sep 18 2009, 01:02 PM Post #8 |
![]()
|
jeez tower... JREF much ?
|
![]() |
|
| bretwalda | Sep 18 2009, 02:34 PM Post #9 |
|
Michael Brass A little more background. ...Personally grateful to Hancock et al. I certainly don't align with all of his epistemology but he is a master at interjecting the most poignant questions to the scientist-priest class. Edited by bretwalda, Sep 18 2009, 02:38 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| noeffects | Sep 18 2009, 08:23 PM Post #10 |
![]()
|
thanks for the info bret ...
|
![]() |
|
| bretwalda | Sep 18 2009, 11:15 PM Post #11 |
|
If that stuff interests you N.E. you should read Hancock's followup to Fingerprints - The Message of the Sphinx. A much more rational breakdown of all the intricate dualism in Egyptology. |
![]() |
|
| Q | Sep 18 2009, 11:52 PM Post #12 |
|
A Higher Evolution
|
If it weren't for a low-level TK field that everyone naturally generates, the world would grind to a complete stop. It is easier to find negative rather than positive examples of TK, one of the best being RME (Reverse Machine Empathy)--you know that person who only has to press "Print" on the photocopier and it suddenly decides to spread its internals over the entire office... Now the person who constantly attracts these negative mechanical outcomes is not physically doing anything, yet how come their "accident" level exceeds that of chance? I repeat: Magic is just telekinesis with a bunch of religious/occult rituals attached. Edited by Q, Sep 19 2009, 12:12 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| tower | Sep 19 2009, 12:33 AM Post #13 |
![]()
|
No, rationalist much. I refuse to accept the existence of something there is no evidence for.
From Hancocks website. How convenient. Here's some background on Hancock: http://www.antiquityofman.com/Bauval_Hancock_Cremo.html
If you're talking about this: ![]() then they've already gained access to it and restored it.
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/khufu.htm And it's not a Viking ship.
How do you know that you have "definitely exerted mental control of the flame"?
So, in other words, you expect me to take your word about this on face value. Sorry, but that won't happen.
What do you base that claim on? What is "TK field"? How do we supposedly generate it?
No, I don't, and blaming your misfortune on a nonexistant field of magic is pathetic, to be honest.
Show me a person that has an accident level "exceeding chance" - whatever that means. |
![]() |
|
| Q | Sep 19 2009, 03:13 AM Post #14 |
|
A Higher Evolution
|
You don't have to believe me. I'm not out to collect followers. Edited by Q, Sep 19 2009, 03:28 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| T3QuillAMocKINGbird | Sep 19 2009, 07:10 AM Post #15 |
![]()
|
To those that believe... no explanition is necessary... to those that don't... none will suffice! |
![]() |
|
| noeffects | Sep 19 2009, 08:25 AM Post #16 |
![]()
|
+1...right on point Any 'debunking' explanations here ? All coincidences ? No 'things that make you go hmm'? It's loaded... http://synchromysticismforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=580#p580 peace... |
![]() |
|
| skunkrider | Sep 20 2009, 03:48 AM Post #17 |
![]()
|
all you numerologists could use some teaching by Bill Bryson from his book "A Short History Of Nearly Everything". anybody read it? |
![]() |
|
| bretwalda | Sep 20 2009, 10:13 PM Post #18 |
|
From Michael Brass's own website. How convenient. |
![]() |
|
| m0n3yman | Sep 21 2009, 12:14 AM Post #19 |
|
Astrology is pseudo-psychology. |
![]() |
|
| alexvegas | Sep 21 2009, 07:49 AM Post #20 |
|
alex25smash
|
That's a really silly thing to say. Much of what JREF and James Randi stand for and do I fully support. Outside of their little anti-9/11-truth clique in the forum they fight some causes that are frankly pretty important. Proving whether things like psychics, homoeopathy, telekinesis etc exist or not needs to happen whilst so many people blindly insist they do without evidence for or against them. Our society is incredibly dumbed down, and belief without proof is pretty much accepted... which is not a healthy way to think. And to 'Q', I'd ask you to post some videos of you moving objects using telekinesis in a controlled environment. Making claims on a forum doesn't really serve much of a purpose. Life should not be about belief, it should be about knowledge... and to those that don't believe, testable evidence equals knowledge. To say 'none will suffice!' is a really blasé dismissive way to approach scepticism/rationalism/realism. Plenty will suffice, just not invented abstract concepts! Edited by alexvegas, Sep 21 2009, 07:54 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| tower | Sep 22 2009, 11:03 AM Post #21 |
![]()
|
So, failing lighters prove pyrokinesis? Did the saboteur test the lighter himself?
That's OK, but if you're going to say things like that on a public forum, don't expect me to stay silent.
A scientific explanation will suffice for me. |
![]() |
|
| Q | Oct 14 2009, 05:30 AM Post #22 |
|
A Higher Evolution
|
Yes, I saw HER testing it--and to be totally honest, I seriously doubt that I could do it today without her being present--she was into some really weird shit. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic » |












3:19 PM Nov 30