| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Regarding NoC | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 16 2009, 11:28 PM (125 Views) | |
| m0n3yman | Sep 16 2009, 11:28 PM Post #1 |
|
I'd like to see what CIT's response can be to this link I recently received: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/NoC |
 |
 
|
| T3QuillAMocKINGbird | Sep 17 2009, 12:07 AM Post #2 |
|
What that Terry Morin Seems to be pointing not so far north? He is standing on the north side of the Official flight path and pointing Northerly and not pointing to the official flight path, I don't see how this could be obscuring of anything he witnessed. Did he turn around to look at the Cell Tower? No he looked North not South. I didn't read all of that page because I saw the video and Lloyd gave plausible doubt to the official story all by himself! You would have to tell me that maybe Lloyd was pranking the interviewer and messing with him just because it would be fun to screw with him and have a funny story to tell his FBI wife later. I wouldn't believe you though. He seemed to me to be covering up like CIT states and witnessed themselves... |
|
|
|
| m0n3yman | Sep 17 2009, 09:29 PM Post #3 |
|
I was generally referring to the stall data. It kills NoC in its tracks if it can't be debunked... |
|
|
|
| 22205 | Sep 18 2009, 01:00 AM Post #4 |
Arlingtonian
|
i dont know where you've been, perhaps u missed it, but the anonymous person who came up with that paper, was here to disseminate and pretend to defend it, but eventually the truth ran its course, and his answer was to commit suicide by mod. so u may want to use the search functions of this forum and follow it post by post, or i can give you a hand: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/profile/124769/ http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/search/?c=4&mid=124769 http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/search/?c=2&mid=124769 you can also find direct refutation of the anonymous liar's disinfo here: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=15930 http://www.filemonster.net/en/file/13676/NoC-TechPaperPDF-pdf.html http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=15854 http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1248677650819981509# but regardless of "reheat's" disinfo:
-the above statement is ridiculous. you are suggesting that because someone manipulated the outcome of their "test" via the numbers they inputted, that a group of over a dozen people all hallucinated, right? that a group of grown men cant tell their left from their right? it doesnt matter if mr.anonymous' subjective scientific gobbeldigook is debunked, what matters is that more than a handful of people all remember where the plane was, and they all corroborate each other on that simple detail, and guess what? that path was NORTH of columbia pike, OVER the annex, and NORTH of the citgo. furthermore, since none of the damage laid in the wake of the "official" path lines up with where the plane actually went, the plane could not have hit the building. since it did not hit the building, and it isnt laying out there on the lawn, said plane flew away from the location. since this did occur, it's more than possible, it's WHAT HAPPENED. so the calculator that says it didnt or couldnt, is mistaken. now please go here: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=315522&t=932237 -and using the information i provided, contact ONE of any number of people from an open and random pool of possible witnesses (based on their location), and see if they "kill noc", or confirm it. so far the pseudoskeptics have done nothing but make excuses instead of just doing it, but maybe you are more up to the task than they have thus far pretended to be. to reitterate: to truly and sufficiently/proportionately refute the NoC witnesses, you need some evidence of equal veracity - like some witnesses recorded on location and on video - who saw the plane south of the citgo (or south of columbia pike). but just cuz a calculator is given bad data (by someone with an agenda) it does not mean these people who are documented on video and on location recalling a plane north of the "official" path, are mistaken or lying or hallucinating. for months plenty of pseudo critical biased "skeptics" tried their best to make it true, but even they had no choice but to give up... cuz they knew how intellectually dishonest they appeared when trying to dismiss the corroboration of such an obvious and simple fact. so... is NoC dead? no. is it killable? no. |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic » |
9:29 AM Nov 30
