JREF analysis of the WTC...Newtons Bit

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

JREF analysis of the WTC...Newtons Bit; Gotta love the stupidity
Topic Started: Sep 15 2009, 12:45 PM (248 Views)
roundhead	Sep 15 2009, 12:45 PM Post #1
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08	Quote from Newtons Bit: "NIST was able to identify 4 pieces of column steel from the fire affected floors. They did not show signs of the paint primer having cracked and split (which happens at 600C). Unfortunately for the truthers, there were a large number of steel sections that had experienced fire and temperatures fairly high, but were unidentifiable as to where in the tower they were from. " So the pieces not from the impact should be expected to be "hotter" as they were from an area that had no fires at all.... OK.....Got it........ And this guy is one of the "smart ones" over there
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08


ULTIMA1	Sep 16 2009, 01:55 AM Post #2
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09	"but were unidentifiable as to where in the tower they were from." The magic words that destroys the facts for the poeple that still believe the official story.
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09


Stundie	Sep 16 2009, 12:18 PM Post #3
Posts: 888 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08	Newtons Bit, now there is a name I've not heard in a while. lol I had questions regarding how the towers collapsed and it just so happens that Gordon Ross had written a paper which scientifically argued the problems I had with the collapse that NIST stated. http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf Newtons Bit joined the SLC Forum and was trying to explain to me how the WTC collapsed and how Gordon Ross was wrong. So I forwarded these criticisms on to Gordon who was gracious enough to reply back to me with a full rebuttal. This pissed Newtons Bit off and he proceeded to write a paper which he submitted to the Journal of 9/11 Studies. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/AnonymousLettertoGordonRoss.pdf Gordon again, decided to school him yet again by responding. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/RossResponsetoAnonymous.pdf I think Newton responded again, but if I remember correctly, it was science free and nothing but ad hominem. I think it went backwards and forwards until it was revealed that Newtons Bit was someone called Trevor if I remember correctly and that he wanted to keep his privacy, which is not surprising seeing that I wouldn't trust him to build me a spliff, let alone a structure. He did post on the old loose change forum but stopped right after I exposed him for the liar he is. http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11796&view=findpost&p=14732727 I do not think he migrated over to the new forum, not surprising really because he would be shown up as the moron he truly is. That is why he sticks to posting at the JREF forum because he can fool the gullible groupthinkers who think he is some kind of genius. lol
Posts: 888 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08


roundhead	Sep 16 2009, 12:39 PM Post #4
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08	The nist report states that of the 236 pieces of steel they tested, only three of them were hotter than 250c... And the one piece of steel that was stated to be from WTC 7(the famous swiss cheese piece)that FEMA said should be investigated was never even mentioned by NIST. Funny, as it was the ONLy piece that wasnt disposed of. The Nist report is so packed full of easily verifiable lies, it almost makes me think somebody there is actually honest, if that makes any sense.
Posts: 39 Group: Members Member #781 Joined: 08/01/08


ULTIMA1	Sep 16 2009, 11:46 PM Post #5
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09	The bad thing about the NIST reports was how many reports came out, how they contridicted the ones before and how many times they kept changing thier minds on the cause. Edited by ULTIMA1, Sep 18 2009, 03:18 AM.
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · World Trade Center · Next Topic »