| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Evan Fairbanks Video; Overlay | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 13 2008, 11:49 AM (842 Views) | |
| enviroace | Apr 13 2008, 11:49 AM Post #1 |
|
The picture I've posted shows a Fairbanks video frame that I've selected, top right is what appears to be the leg of a helicopter and I cut out a partial view that could be taken from above. I think this is a aerial shot overlaid onto Evens ground shot, any thoughts? Rude |
![]() |
|
| Nevermind | Apr 13 2008, 09:18 PM Post #2 |
|
Oh, you didn't know?
|
So the video is fake? Is that what you're implying? Because if you are, you better read the through the rules again. |
![]() |
|
| enviroace | Apr 13 2008, 09:59 PM Post #3 |
|
I'm in no way implying that the plane is fake, I'm not and believe it's real. I do believe that this film has been doctored, are you saying that stating or debating the 9/11 films is not allowed? |
![]() |
|
| Nevermind | Apr 13 2008, 10:13 PM Post #4 |
|
Oh, you didn't know?
|
Debating the films is fine. Debating if the videos are fake falls into the category of NPT/TV fakery and is not tolerated here. I asked you if the video was a fake, not the plane. So, you think Fairbanks' video has been doctored since day one. Why is that and what are you driving at? Edited by Nevermind, Apr 13 2008, 10:22 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 22205 | Apr 13 2008, 11:42 PM Post #5 |
|
Arlingtonian
|
question: if thats the leg of a helicopter, why is the view of the towers from the ground up? how could a helicopter's view look like that? i admit that i cant tell what it is and have spent some considerable time on it (before) trying to figure it out. so i agree with you if you say its a strange looking thing and hard to decipher. but i dont see why it would be a helicopter's landing arm/leg (or whatever they are technically called). help me understand your reasoning please. |
![]() |
|
| Nevermind | Apr 14 2008, 01:08 AM Post #6 |
|
Oh, you didn't know?
|
And enviroace, if you came here to promote nonsense like this, you came to the wrong place and might as well keep looking for a forum that you can "fit into". http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=10641&hl=
|
![]() |
|
| enviroace | Apr 14 2008, 06:41 AM Post #7 |
|
Gideon, I do believe planes were used in the attacks, and I believe that the films have been doctored. I don't in anyway want to push NPT, I don't buy the theory at all. I'm a serious investigator / researcher, I work on my own with only one motive, try and find out the truth. I graduated from Civil / Environmental Engineering and have erected 100s of telecommunication towers through out north America. My perspective and skills are unique because of my experience with height, engineering, and technology. The no-planners tell me that I'm not welcome under their tent because I do believe that planes were used, and your telling me I'm not welcome here because I believe the films were doctored? I follow the truth with no preference of were it may lead, and no choices in what I'll find, the truth was what actually happened that day, not what I or anyone else wants it to be. I only want the freedom to discuss the things I've found, without insults from opposing views, but with thoughtful input and questioning to aid in finding the truth, not to push any particular view or theory. Gideon, are you saying that this is not allowed? Rude |
![]() |
|
| enviroace | Apr 14 2008, 06:54 AM Post #8 |
|
I read the rules again, second time, please tell me where it says that I can't discuss the doctoring of films? I firmly believe that planes were used, I fail to see the conflict, please explain. |
![]() |
|
| Nevermind | Apr 14 2008, 11:55 PM Post #9 |
|
Oh, you didn't know?
|
By implying the video is doctored, that would mean it's not authentic. In English, it's a fake video, a fake video that has been around for 6 1/2 years. A fake video that would prove, hypothetically of course, that whoever faked the video wanted to alter what the public saw happen to the World Trade Center on 9/11. TV fakery and NPT, despite the highest hopes of the wack jobs who push this ridiculous theory, are not mutually exclusive. In other words, you can't have one without the other. And if the videos were indeed faked, then so were the hundreds of recorded eyewitness accounts. To suggest that some of the over 60 video cameras that filmed the second attack were manipulated to change what the public saw happen to the WTC is ludicrous and makes no sense at all and it will not be acknowledged here at LCF. I dare you to discuss NPT/TV fakery with some of the victims families who support a new 9/11 investigation and see if you don't get laughed out of the room or punched in the face. If discussing that shit is so important to you, find somewhere else to discuss it. There are plenty forums out there, or have they all banned you too? Do not wear out your welcome before your 10th post. Final warning. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Investigate 9/11 · Next Topic » |


AIR_SHOT_b.jpg (35.47 KB)



2:13 PM Jul 11