| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Another CD that failed; Yes, it stopped | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 17 2009, 04:56 PM (331 Views) | |
| einsteen | Jul 17 2009, 04:56 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD126r9ihaw |
![]() |
|
| BoneZ | Jul 18 2009, 12:53 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Thanks for posting this. |
![]() |
|
| Chris Sarns | Jul 18 2009, 03:39 PM Post #3 |
|
Thanks einsteen Added to my library and forwarded to team. Chris |
![]() |
|
| Frank Spinatra | Oct 21 2009, 03:02 PM Post #4 |
|
Isn't that interesting? You would have thought that gravity alone would have kept it falling, at least those in charge say it did for WTC buildings. I can bet that someone out there will say that this CD is not the same as the WTC collapses because there was no fire burning in this example, so the rest of its structure wouldn't have been weakened. Good vid. |
![]() |
|
| Avenger | Oct 23 2009, 12:52 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
Yeah, symmetrical fires burning at the same rate at the same time, since the building dropped straight down. Symmetrical fires as opposed to symmetrical explosives which apparently is over-rated. Nothing like invisible symmetrical fires and asymmetric damage to bring a building straight down. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · WTC 7 · Next Topic » |









3:46 PM Nov 25