New Pics of Pentagon Attack

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

New Pics of Pentagon Attack
Topic Started: Jul 14 2009, 08:30 PM (1,237 Views)
DoYouEverWonder	Jul 14 2009, 08:30 PM Post #1
Posts: 437 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: 01/24/08	Just came across some images that apparently were only released about a year ago. Some interesting stuff here. Courtney Platt Photos
Posts: 437 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: 01/24/08


JFK	Jul 14 2009, 08:54 PM Post #2
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	DoYouEverWonder Jul 14 2009, 08:30 PM Attached to this post: LE_slat.png (118.06 KB) Edited by JFK, Jul 14 2009, 09:01 PM.
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


22205	Jul 15 2009, 02:17 PM Post #3
Arlingtonian Posts: 444 Group: Members Member #24 Joined: 01/14/08	informative link: http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2008/10/courtney-platt.html



noeffects	Jul 15 2009, 03:14 PM Post #4
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	very informative link
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


DoYouEverWonder	Jul 15 2009, 03:29 PM Post #5
Posts: 437 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: 01/24/08	22205 Jul 15 2009, 02:17 PM informative link: http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2008/10/courtney-platt.html Interesting stuff Steve dug up. It's even got a link to my fundie research.
Posts: 437 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: 01/24/08


Citizen Pawn	Jul 16 2009, 04:22 AM Post #6
Posts: 601 Group: Members Member #202 Joined: 01/24/08	Can I ask what the reference to the Boeing manual is for?
Posts: 601 Group: Members Member #202 Joined: 01/24/08


JFK	Aug 16 2009, 07:56 PM Post #7
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Citizen Pawn Jul 16 2009, 04:22 AM Can I ask what the reference to the Boeing manual is for? The piece/part in the quoted image.
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


AR10	Aug 31 2009, 11:59 AM Post #8
Posts: 24 Group: Members Member #1,301 Joined: 08/25/09	Small stuff like this could be placed in the missile or drone plane that could have been used. It could also have been dropped from 5,000 feet straight up (along with larger pieces). The Government controls the airspace. Where are the engines, where are the 400 aircraft seats, where are the thousand or so pieces of luggage? Where is the tail section? Where are the wings? Where are the dead bodies? Where is the outrage over this cover-Up? Edited by AR10, Aug 31 2009, 12:00 PM.
Posts: 24 Group: Members Member #1,301 Joined: 08/25/09


hamba	Sep 2 2009, 05:46 AM Post #9
Posts: 53 Group: Skeptics Member #387 Joined: 03/09/08	AR10 Aug 31 2009, 11:59 AM Small stuff like this could be placed in the missile or drone plane that could have been used. It could also have been dropped from 5,000 feet straight up (along with larger pieces). The Government controls the airspace. Where are the engines, where are the 400 aircraft seats, where are the thousand or so pieces of luggage? Where is the tail section? Where are the wings? Where are the dead bodies? Where is the outrage over this cover-Up? There are photographs of dead bodies, still in there seats at the Pentagon crash site. Your post proves you never tried to search for them. Which proves you are not fully committed to doing proper research. This is also not surprising since, you will not believe the authenticity of the picture so why you bother asking for evidence is beyond me. Where is the outrage? Good question! Everyone on this board and the famed CIT are free and able to go to any lawyer and lodge a suit with the theories they have at their disposal, against the government. Anyone is free and able to go and lodge an insurance fraud dispute over the insurance payments made with respect to the destruction of the towers. It will be the news story of the century. Yet, no one does. Instead thousands of pointless posts are made all over the internet accomplishing nothing. The truth movemnet has no single theory it has no single form of leadership, it is fractured into many facets, characterised by each factions own interpretation of the events. No unified theory can ever be reached. 8 years after the fact and the movement still deliberates whether or not nukes were used, was it thermite or thermate or nano thermite. Yet, no one ever addressed the root of that line of discussion. The root of that line of discussion is simply - How did the bombs, charges or whatever get into the buildings without discovery? Its the starting block that could help the truth movemnet immensly, yet no one has ever provided an explanation. So in essence the truth movements theories are left without a starting point. What happens if you have no starting point? You have no direction and certainly no conclusive end. Which is exactly what we see happening with all the theories 8 years later. This fractured nature of the truth movement is its downfall. No collective thought on specific theories is given. A focused brain storming session where the leaders of the truth movement sit down and decide once and for all which theories are the least likely and those are subsequantly excluded so one general theory can be developed. This has the extreme advantage that now all the theorists can focus in on one theory, hence strengthening the research around that theory. Alot of time is wasted when people research other impossible theories. The advantages of focusing in on one unified theory are endless. Why this has never happened is a mystery, but probably centres on the quality of evidence and theories which each faction uses and misuses.
Posts: 53 Group: Skeptics Member #387 Joined: 03/09/08


noeffects	Sep 2 2009, 07:09 AM Post #10
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	hamba There are photographs of dead bodies, still in there seats at the Pentagon crash site. what seats ?...airplane seats ?... hamba Everyone on this board and the famed CIT are free and able to go to any lawyer and lodge a suit with the theories they have at their disposal, against the government. Anyone is free and able to go and lodge an insurance fraud dispute over the insurance payments made with respect to the destruction of the towers. It will be the news story of the century. It won't be the news story of the century...plenty of lawsuits have been filed... Does this ring a bell ? ..'Your post proves you never tried to search for them. Which proves you are not fully committed to doing proper research.' ...pot meet kettle...
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


JFK	Sep 2 2009, 09:46 AM Post #11
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	hamba Sep 2 2009, 05:46 AM There are photographs of dead bodies, still in there seats at the Pentagon crash site. Link to them. And no "hamba", we won't go away. Edited by JFK, Sep 2 2009, 11:45 AM.
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


hamba	Sep 2 2009, 11:40 PM Post #12
Posts: 53 Group: Skeptics Member #387 Joined: 03/09/08	I know you wont go away. Read my post I am stressing that you shouldn't go away but you should decide on one unified theory on which all resources can be concentrated so a more dedicated theory can be developed. http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/45P.jpg here is a link to a photograph of a body found in the Pentagon. The law suits filed, how far have they gone what is the outcome? Have CIT filed one yet?
Posts: 53 Group: Skeptics Member #387 Joined: 03/09/08


JFK	Sep 3 2009, 12:50 AM Post #13
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	hamba Sep 2 2009, 11:40 PM I know you wont go away. Read my post I am stressing that you shouldn't go away but you should decide on one unified theory on which all resources can be concentrated so a more dedicated theory can be developed. http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/45P.jpg here is a link to a photograph of a body found in the Pentagon. The law suits filed, how far have they gone what is the outcome? Have CIT filed one yet? Sorry, that is not an airplane seat nor it it a passenger. Do you wanna try again ?
Posts: 4,225 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Sep 3 2009, 04:51 AM Post #14
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	hamba Sep 2 2009, 11:40 PM hamba There are photographs of dead bodies, still in there seats at the Pentagon crash site. http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/45P.jpg here is a link to a photograph of a body found in the Pentagon. what a sick little fiend you are. in your opening statements you say "still in there [their] seats at the Pentagon crash site" which you clearly are claiming that these are airplane seats and thus proof of the official narrative. then in response you post a picture of a victim from the pentagon as if this is proof but knowing they are not strapped to any airplane seat you just state it is a photo of a body found in the pentagon as if the argument was that no one died in the pentagon on 9/11. you're pathetic.
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


hamba	Sep 3 2009, 09:18 AM Post #15
Posts: 53 Group: Skeptics Member #387 Joined: 03/09/08	I misinterpreted the picture. I incorrectly assumed that it was of a passenger in a airline seat. I am guilty of not researching that picture. In this matter I am the pot!! No doubt about that. I made a mistake, you are welcome to crucify me as much as you want. On careful consideration it becomes apparent why there are no photographs of this nature. The plane hit the building and broke up, hence the chance that an intact body strapped to a seat would be found is significantly low. My error in judgement on what that photograph was showing has highlited an issue. Would a photo of a passanger in a seat be enough to prove to you that the official story is true? News articles about the discovery of bodies and categorised DNA evidence collected from the scene and traced back to passangers of the plane has done nothing to convince you of the official story. So how would a photo help? Surely the same argument would be applied, i.e. how do we know they did not stage the photo etc etc. Much like the argument made on aircraft debris. What amount of evidence would you require that would convince you of the official story? DNA evidence was of no help so what more do you require?
Posts: 53 Group: Skeptics Member #387 Joined: 03/09/08


Flippy	Sep 3 2009, 01:39 PM Post #16
Posts: 579 Group: Members Member #8 Joined: 01/12/08	hamba Sep 3 2009, 09:18 AM News articles about the discovery of bodies and categorised DNA evidence collected from the scene and traced back to passangers of the plane has done nothing to convince you of the official story. Explain to me how exactly they were able to find DNA evidence from human remains when they can't even find the fucking jumbo jet that disappeared on impact. Edited by Flippy, Sep 3 2009, 01:39 PM.
Posts: 579 Group: Members Member #8 Joined: 01/12/08


DoYouEverWonder	Sep 3 2009, 02:25 PM Post #17
Posts: 437 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: 01/24/08	hamba Sep 3 2009, 09:18 AM I misinterpreted the picture. I incorrectly assumed that it was of a passenger in a airline seat. I am guilty of not researching that picture. In this matter I am the pot!! No doubt about that. I made a mistake, you are welcome to crucify me as much as you want. On careful consideration it becomes apparent why there are no photographs of this nature. The plane hit the building and broke up, hence the chance that an intact body strapped to a seat would be found is significantly low. My error in judgement on what that photograph was showing has highlited an issue. Would a photo of a passanger in a seat be enough to prove to you that the official story is true? News articles about the discovery of bodies and categorised DNA evidence collected from the scene and traced back to passangers of the plane has done nothing to convince you of the official story. So how would a photo help? Surely the same argument would be applied, i.e. how do we know they did not stage the photo etc etc. Much like the argument made on aircraft debris. What amount of evidence would you require that would convince you of the official story? DNA evidence was of no help so what more do you require? Give it up. You blew it. We can imagine all day long and it won't make a difference. There's no evidence of a plane because there is no plane. If there was a plane, there would be lots of evidence all over the place. If there was one seat, there would have been 100+ seats.
Posts: 437 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: 01/24/08


ULTIMA1	Sep 5 2009, 07:21 AM Post #18
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09	Flippy Sep 3 2009, 01:39 PM hamba Sep 3 2009, 09:18 AM News articles about the discovery of bodies and categorised DNA evidence collected from the scene and traced back to passangers of the plane has done nothing to convince you of the official story. Explain to me how exactly they were able to find DNA evidence from human remains when they can't even find the fucking jumbo jet that disappeared on impact. Also if the fire was hot enough to destroy the plane it would have also destroyed DNA.
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09


logos	Sep 5 2009, 08:36 PM Post #19
Posts: 18 Group: Members Member #632 Joined: 06/03/08	I don't think anyone needs to bring the ACTUAL facts of what happened on 9/11 to court because that would be impossible. What SHOULD be filed is the GROSS NEGLIGENCE of the authorities that handled 1) the investigation, and 2) the actual events in real time. Start making the "littler guys" sweat and see how they spill names and information, and watch the subpoenas start being handed out. Truth is, i dont ever think we'll know exactly what happened because there has been so much misinformation presented to the world. But what IS available is what they did wrong and what they neglected to do all along... THEIR JOB!
Posts: 18 Group: Members Member #632 Joined: 06/03/08


bretwalda	Sep 8 2009, 12:26 AM Post #20
Posts: 205 Group: Members Member #173 Joined: 01/21/08	Funny how all these identifiable aircraft parts only and always show up on lawn...just laying there...in seclusion. Other pieces of the spoiler? nah. Anything too big to pick up? nah.
Posts: 205 Group: Members Member #173 Joined: 01/21/08


noeffects	Sep 8 2009, 09:59 PM Post #21
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	logos I don't think anyone needs to bring the ACTUAL facts of what happened on 9/11 to court because that would be impossible. What SHOULD be filed is the GROSS NEGLIGENCE of the authorities that handled 1) the investigation, and 2) the actual events in real time. Start making the "littler guys" sweat and see how they spill names and information, and watch the subpoenas start being handed out. Truth is, i dont ever think we'll know exactly what happened because there has been so much misinformation presented to the world. But what IS available is what they did wrong and what they neglected to do all along... THEIR JOB! could you imagine how pissed off this guy... would be if he saw this !...
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


ULTIMA1	Sep 10 2009, 03:24 AM Post #22
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09	noeffects Sep 8 2009, 09:59 PM logos I don't think anyone needs to bring the ACTUAL facts of what happened on 9/11 to court because that would be impossible. NO it is not impossible to show facts and evindece in court of what happened. I have a FOIA request for a documet that would hold up in court and questions the official story. Edited by ULTIMA1, Sep 10 2009, 03:27 AM.
Posts: 183 Group: Members Member #1,188 Joined: 05/26/09


diogenesdisappointed	Sep 13 2009, 08:49 PM Post #23
Posts: 6 Group: Skeptics Member #1,362 Joined: 09/13/09	http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/docs/moussaoui/P200045_1.jpg there is a photo of a body in the Pentagon. It is dead and it is burnt. I suppose somebody planted it there because it screws up your "theories".
Posts: 6 Group: Skeptics Member #1,362 Joined: 09/13/09


diogenesdisappointed	Sep 13 2009, 08:54 PM Post #24
Posts: 6 Group: Skeptics Member #1,362 Joined: 09/13/09	You people seem to be the most uninformed group I have ever witnessed. You ask questions like "where are the bodies?" or "where are the engines??" Photos of bodies recovered within the Pentagon have been released. Photos of pieces of the engines have been released.
Posts: 6 Group: Skeptics Member #1,362 Joined: 09/13/09


diogenesdisappointed	Sep 13 2009, 08:56 PM Post #25
Posts: 6 Group: Skeptics Member #1,362 Joined: 09/13/09	bodies?? You want bodies?? Attached to this post: P200042_1.jpg (287.07 KB) P200045_1.jpg (297.89 KB) P200047_1.jpg (311.11 KB) P200048_1.jpg (278.41 KB)
Posts: 6 Group: Skeptics Member #1,362 Joined: 09/13/09


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2