Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
A message from Anonymous RE:Iran; Help spread the word
Topic Started: Jun 20 2009, 09:33 PM (808 Views)
JFK
Member Avatar



Quote:
 
Hello, leaders of Iran. We are Anonymous.

As the eyes of the entire world hold you under close scrutiny, the eyes of the internet have taken a similar notice of your recent actions. While the governments of the world condemn you for your suppression of human rights, Anonymous has taken a particular interest in your recent attempts to censor the internet, not only for your own people, but for the citizens of the entire world.

Such suppression of dissent cannot go unpunished. By cutting off communication of the Iranian citizens to the rest of the world, you have made it clear to us that the most revered of human rights - the right to free speech - is no longer important to you. By seeking to silence the voice of the people in an election and subsequently seeking to silence criticism of such a gross cover-up, you have perpetuated the anger and rage of your people. Anonymous has therefore made it our mission to see to it that the voice of the Iranian people can be heard around the world.

Just like another authoritarian religious extremist group, Anonymous will tear down the walls of silence using only the truth - the truth that you are trying so hard to suppress by use of violence, intimidation, and fascist laws.

As your people continue to riot and to speak out against you; as you continue to beat and shoot your own citizens in the street; as you continue to lie to the face of the entire world; know that the internet is watching - and we do not like what we see.

Knowledge is free.

We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.

Expect us.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BoneZ
Member Avatar

Amen.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Quote:
 

‫امروز، سی خرداد، ساعت 7 بعد از ظهر این دختر جوان توسط لباس شخصی ها کشته شد‬

Basij shoots to death a young woman in Tehran's Saturday June 20th protests

June 20th
Place: Karekar Ave., at the corner crossing Khosravi St. and Salehi st.

A young woman who was standing aside with her father watching the protests was shot by a basij member hiding on the rooftop of a civilian house. He had clear shot at the girl and could not miss her. However, he aimed straight her heart. I am a doctor, so I rushed to try to save her. But the impact of the gunshot was so fierce that the bullet had blasted inside the victim's chest, and she died in less than 2 minutes.
The protests were going on about 1 kilometers away in the main street and some of the protesting crowd were running from tear gass used among them, towards Salehi St.
The film is shot by my friend who was standing beside me.
Please let the world know


Torrent file HERE.

Posted Image

( You must have a bit torrent client already set up to use the above link )

Caution - Graphic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJ45l4RKE8o

Quote:
 
Neda Agha Soltan born 1982, Philosophy Student
Edited by JFK, Jun 21 2009, 12:54 PM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
skunkrider
Member Avatar

it's hard for me to look through the mist of the information war when it comes to Iran.

the idea of people fighting against a stolen election sounds just too romantic for me, too cushioning,
too "well, they tried! and they were beaten back violently, now we as the West need to help"...

also the Western media says the Iranian GOP uses media manipulation to create the impression of
more people supporting Ahmadinedjad, while people from the internet (and this forum) have expressed concerns that
western media actually does the same (BBC..)

are we shepherded into another war, this time against Iran?

honestly, i'm sick of all the games, just give us an honest and nice early armageddon instead :ermm:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mynameis
Member Avatar
Internet Jujitsu
Protests attack on Basij compound Basij fight back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjzTMeETd5Q

Iran after election 2009 Paramilitary Basiji Shooting at Civilians
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gfKyzfPKao
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1819769/1/
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mike_abcd

wouldn't be surprised years later if we find out that the conflicts r funded by some intelligence agencies/contras/military industrial complex

just like the iran contra affair/nicaraguan contra/'british patsies dressed up like iraqis' aggravating the conflict in iraq and on and on
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mumin

I've been silent on the issue, but why do Westerners care about the election results? The president in Iran is analogous to the royal family of England. They are essentially a facade. Iran is an "Islamic" republic (I use quotation marks, because they are Shi'ahs), so the Ayatollahs are the ones who regulate the laws and the president has little power. It doesn't matter who is elected in Iran.

Secondly, the opposition party constituted a far smaller minority. I don't see how Mir Hossein Messwhateverhisnameis could have won the election.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Actually it is a "theocratic republic".

Should we not care about injustice such as was demonstrated this past week against peaceful protestors by the Basij ( hired guns of Ahmadinejad ) ?

Perhaps you are able to translate this.

Posted Image

That should answer the rest of your question. ;)
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
22205
Member Avatar
Arlingtonian
jfk, i have no issue with the allegation that iran's majority votes for mousavi were fraudulently dismissed and or not counted. so i am in agreement with those (iranians) who are outraged and feel disenfranchised as a result of ahmadinejad's swindle. but regarding the alleged documentation you posted, i see some anomallies that make it suspect and i would like shed some light on them.

my understanding (via translation) of the text of that document is that it is a final vote tally for the election. it is allegedly written by and signed by the minister of the interior, sadeq mahsouli and is addressed to supreme leader khamenei. included are exact numbers for the election results, with mousavi having almost 4 times as many votes as ahmadinejad.

for the minister of the interior to post these numbers, would be considered an outright act of defiance and provocation towards ahmadinejad and khamenei. basically this document, if authentic and true, would serve to undermine those who are being of accused of having fraudulently stolen this election, namely ahmadinejad and khamenei (who endorsed ahmadi's "victory"). so whats odd or doesnt make sense is that sadeq mahsouli (minister of interior) was appointed by ahmadinejad himself months ago, which is highly suspected (by iranians now) to be in preparation for stealing this electoral victory. for mahsouli to have presented a document with the above tallies would roughly be the equivalent of KATHERINE HARRIS (link1, link2) coming in out in 2000 and saying that the numbers indeed showed Gore to be the victor in florida (and thus the nation).



back to iran (mahsouli and ahmadinejad) here are some relevant links:

http://tinyurl.com/nmw4re
Quote:
 
TEHRAN (Reuters) -- Iran's parliament narrowly approved President Mahmud Ahmadinejad's choice for interior minister on November 18, after the previous minister was sacked in a vote by lawmakers over a fake university degree.

Sadeq Mahsouli, a former Revolutionary Guards comrade of the president, takes charge of the ministry responsible for overseeing elections seven months before a presidential poll. Ahmadinejad is expected to run but has yet to declare.

The November 18 vote in favor of Mahsouli -- 138 of the 273 lawmakers present, only just more than half -- will be a relief to Ahmadinejad, who has faced mounting criticism from parliament particularly over his economic policies and surging inflation.

Mahsouli had been a nominee for oil minister early in Ahmadinejad's term but withdrew after lawmakers criticised his wealth and lack of related experience. Parliament must approve ministers and can also kick them out.

The previous interior minister, Ali Kordan, was forced out by parliament for having a fake degree from Britain's Oxford University.

"Today we need someone at the Interior Ministry who can manage and put things together. After all, we have had some shakiness at the ministry in the last five to six months," the president told lawmakers in an address to win support.

Mahsouli had campaigned hard before the vote to secure the backing of lawmakers, many of whom were wary of the choice.

"Cooperation between the government and parliament is very important and, through this cooperation, we should disappoint our enemies," Ahmadinejad said in a speech that some initially reluctant MPs said struck a conciliatory tone.

Some still opposed Mahsouli, saying the pick was part of Ahmadinejad's reelection campaign before the June vote.

"This choice is a choice for the election," said conservative MP Hossein Falahatpisheh, adding that Mahsouli had been a campaign manager for Ahmadinejad in past elections.

"By selecting him now as his interior minister, it is like forming an election headquarters before the election," he said.



then there is this:
http://www2.irna.ir/fa/news/view/line-16/0906124146191504.htm
Quote:
 
Minister announces final election results, names Ahmadinejad winner

Tehran, June 13, IRNA – Interior Minister Sadeq Mahsouli said Saturday that 39,165,191 valid and invalid votes were cast in the 10th Presidential Elections on Friday June 12.

Mahsouli said that final election results show that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has got 24,527,516 or 62.63 percent of the total votes.

He said that on alphabetic order, other candiates are Mohsen Rezaie Qaed, with 678,240 or 1.73 percent of votes, Mehdi Karroubi, with 333,635 or 0.85 percent and Mir-Hossein Moussavi Khamene with 13,216,411 or 33.75 percent of the votes.

The Minister put the number of invalid votes at 409,389 or 1.04 percent of the total.

He put the number of eligible voters at 46,200,000 and said 85 percent of the population had taken part in the event.

He said that people’s turnout set an unprecedented record and was a big epic, thanking all governors general, officials in charge of elections and the Iranian nation for that.


*note by me: the above fits the alleged "11 million votes" that ahmadinejad supposedly beat mousavi by.


now - since mahsouli is (for the most part) a shill for ahmadinejad, the above tallies seem alot more credible as far as what mahsouli would have reported, as opposed to the ones below:

alleged official farsi document signed by mahsouli
 

total votes (cast): 42026078

mousavi: 19075623

karoubi: 13387104

ahmadinejad: 5698417

fayed: 3754218

invalid votes: 38716


-compare them to the numbers presented in the iranian press release and none of them match. im not saying either (or any) of the vote tallies is accurate, since i believe the results to have been tampered with and or fraudulent. but i feel the need to warn against being tricked by the information war thats being waged by the various sides with something at stake in this issue. but from my personal understanding of things (specifically mahsouli's relationship to ahmadinejad and khamenei) i find it very unlikely that the iranian document is authentic.



***


more about mahsouli:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Sadeq+Mahsouli&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

more about mahsouli and ahmadinejad's direct relationship:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Sadeq+Mahsouli+interior+%22ahmadinejad%27s+nominee%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi=



Edited by 22205, Jun 21 2009, 10:42 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Yes, there has been a debate going on elsewhere about the authenticity of that document since I posted it.

The proported origins are described here

http://cbs5.com/national/iran.presidential.elections.2.1049651.html

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Semi off topic but interesting.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/13/europe39s-telecoms-aid-with-spy-tech/?feat=article_top10_read
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
22205
Member Avatar
Arlingtonian
JFK
Jun 21 2009, 11:11 PM
Yes, there has been a debate going on elsewhere about the authenticity of that document since I posted it.

The proported origins are described here

http://cbs5.com/national/iran.presidential.elections.2.1049651.html

i noticed neither of the sites (the one u linked links to a uk article) mentions anything about mahsouli's ties to ahmadinejad and the direct impact that has on evaluating the authenticity of the document. but thanks for the link jfk!

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mumin

I highly suspect that document that just so happened to be leaked and mass distributed. Additionally, given that Ahmedinijad was favored to win, I don't see how this was a fraudulent election. There is no evidence of foul play. All those protesters who have the green signs that say, "Where is my vote?", the answer is, "It was counted, but your guy lost". It seems that Western countries support democratic elections, as long as their guy wins. Look at Hamas.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
EOR
Member Avatar

I wish Anonymous would have written a letter to Bush when he was "elected" and began to rape the world.
Edited by EOR, Jun 22 2009, 11:19 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Mumin
Jun 22 2009, 11:13 AM
I highly suspect that document that just so happened to be leaked and mass distributed. Additionally, given that Ahmedinijad was favored to win, I don't see how this was a fraudulent election. There is no evidence of foul play. All those protesters who have the green signs that say, "Where is my vote?", the answer is, "It was counted, but your guy lost". It seems that Western countries support democratic elections, as long as their guy wins. Look at Hamas.
And then some...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6553843.ece

:roll:
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mumin

Evidence of Western Intelligence Meddling in Iranian Elections:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/june2009/220609Meddling.htm
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Well mumin, I for one am glad that you have shown your true colors by supporting this.

http://ncr-iran.org/content/view/6554/170/

Posted Image



Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mumin

I don't support a slain girl, if that's what you are implying.... That would be ridiculous.

I believe that the whole "revolution" was concocted and innocent people are suffering in this.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mumin

I would like to pose a question to everyone. Why is everyone so interested in the results of the Iranian elections?

Where was the outrage from the International community when Hafiz Al-Assad, former president of Syria died, and his son, Bashar Al-Asad, inherited his presidency. How come no one challenged the fact that there were no elections and the presidency was passed down as if it were a monarchy?

How come there were no outrages from the International community, when it was proven that the 2004 U.S. elections had been rigged?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Because this began as a peaceful protest by the people which the Iranian government turned into violence.

And because the people are remaining peaceful for the most part and continueing regardless of the fact that it is deemed illegal by the Iranian government.

Frankly the perseverance of the Iranian people in recent days truly impresses me.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

wait, isn't 'anonymous' col jenny sparks and her team of agents?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Domenick DiMaggio
Jun 22 2009, 05:50 PM
wait, isn't 'anonymous' col jenny sparks and her team of agents?
Only if they wear Guy Fawkes masks in public. :P
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

22205
Jun 22 2009, 12:03 AM
JFK
Jun 21 2009, 11:11 PM
Yes, there has been a debate going on elsewhere about the authenticity of that document since I posted it.

The proported origins are described here

http://cbs5.com/national/iran.presidential.elections.2.1049651.html

i noticed neither of the sites (the one u linked links to a uk article) mentions anything about mahsouli's ties to ahmadinejad and the direct impact that has on evaluating the authenticity of the document. but thanks for the link jfk!

You are welcome 22205, Another link - http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/20090618/iran-election-results-european-union.htm
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic »
Add Reply