Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Renovated express elevator shafts -a key to the collapse
Topic Started: May 23 2009, 03:07 PM (323 Views)
TDX
Member Avatar



the video explains everything :cigar:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DoYouEverWonder

Interesting, but someone needs to fix the spelling mistakes.

The first text slide ammount should be amount.

Also, in the title that appears about the video on You Tube, shats should be shafts.

Even thought I think the video maker is on the right track, it's hard to take someone's research seriously when they can't even get the title right.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TDX
Member Avatar

oh, yes

the video was made for my czech blog post, this is only a quick translation, I did it in late night......and I tried to do so quickly, so it ended up like that, sorry I usually use translator, but this time......

However, it's "your" fault if you can't see forest for the trees, form<content

and even then, you can find everything in NIST report and Gordon Ross or T.Szamboti would confirm that the mechanism would work, logic confirms that



to the topic: do you really belive that I'm right?
Edited by TDX, May 24 2009, 11:58 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DoYouEverWonder

TDX
May 24 2009, 11:55 AM
oh, yes

the video was made for my czech blog post, this is only a quick translation, I did it in late night......and I tried to do so quickly, so it ended up like that, sorry I usually use translator, but this time......

However, it's "your" fault if you can't see forest for the trees, form<content

and even then, you can find everything in NIST report and Gordon Ross or T.Szamboti would confirm that the mechanism would work, logic confirms that



to the topic: do you really belive that I'm right?
Yes, I think you're on the right track. I've been convinced for a long time that the elevator shafts, especially the express elevators played a key roll in bringing down the Towers.

Way back when I was in college, I got to ride the express freight elevators a couple of times. They were designed with an entrance a street level that you could drive a truck directly onto them and go to any floor. It was a cheap thrill to ride to the top sitting in your van.

What I believe is that they prepped the buildings at least a few months, if not years in advance, with thermite and cutter charges on the mechanical floors, under the hat trusses and in key corners, then on the morning of the attack, they could just drive into the freight elevators with the big stuff (possibly thermobaric weapons) and blew the buildings apart by dropping the hat trusses and blowing out the columns in the core.

(Sorry, to be so critical about the spelling)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BoneZ
Member Avatar

It's a very interesting hypothesis and seems plausible.

However, the part at the very end about rap music, I find it offensive and just plain stupid. There's absolutely no reason for something like that to be in a 9/11 video. Nobody cares what your opinions are of rap music. If you want to be taken seriously, you can't be throwing in your biased opinions about something that doesn't even pertain to the topic of the video.

Now I may be misunderstanding your intentions of putting it in the video, but it still doesn't belong there.
Edited by BoneZ, May 24 2009, 12:30 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TDX
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
under the hat trusses


yes, definitely, the core columns at 104th and 105th floor were attacked with thermite, too

Quote:
 
thermobaric weapons


I'm sorry, but thermobaric weapons can't affect stell, their brisance is too low, I know what I'm talking about, and they would cause a lot of attention

Quote:
 
(Sorry, to be so critical about the spelling)

That's all right, I deserved it.

Quote:
 
Nobody cares what your opinions are of rap music. If you want to be taken seriously, you can't be throwing in your biased opinions about something that doesn't even pertain to the topic of the video.

Now I may be misunderstanding your intentions of putting it in the video, but it still doesn't belong there.


I didn't want my video to be too serious, so I put some randoom stuff in it, but I did not want to start a debate, I don't hate rap music

hope you understand
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
BoneZ
Member Avatar

TDX
May 24 2009, 01:51 PM
I didn't want my video to be too serious, so I put some randoom stuff in it

hope you understand
With regards to 9/11, it should be taken as serious as possible if you want people to take you and your research seriously.

This following isn't necessarily directed towards you, but 9/11 isn't fun, it isn't humorous and it is completely serious. I hope you understand. ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
noeffects
Member Avatar

I think you should make it serious...it's easier for other posters to use elsewhere...and in turn , less flack all around...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DoYouEverWonder

TDX

Quote:
 
I'm sorry, but thermobaric weapons can't affect stell, their brisance is too low, I know what I'm talking about, and they would cause a lot of attention


------

Posted Image

I think if you set off a weapon(s) in the elevator shaft, that most of the fireball would be obscured by the curtain walls and once the curtain walls blew, there was so much smoke and concrete dust, that the 'fire' ball was a big smoke/dust ball.

However, there are a few photos that caught the fireball that erupted, when the collapse of WTC 1 began.
Edited by DoYouEverWonder, May 25 2009, 08:13 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · World Trade Center · Next Topic »
Add Reply