| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Pentagon conclusions | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 11 2009, 08:14 PM (282 Views) | |
| biscuit cough | May 11 2009, 08:14 PM Post #1 |
|
Hello again, everyone! Has anyone ever considered how many hundreds of hours have been spent on 9/11 and particularly Pentagon research? Many of us owe a debt of gratitude for the fine work done by the Citizen Investigation Team (not all work done by CIT is fine). Almost single-handedly these guys have proven that the Pentagon attack was a military black operation showing conclusively that the plane flew north of the (former) Citgo station. Thank you very much, guys! What's somewhat disappointing is that after all this research, there is still some confusion about certain particulars. Well, after many months, I have to say I have figured it out. I know exactly what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11. While there are still many unknown details, thanks to the work of CIT and Pilots for 9/11 Truth, we can all know what happened on that fateful morning. Considering the reception I've received at this forum, as well as others, rather than spelling out directly what happened, I will instead give you one hint. Much research has been done, and many things have been proven regarding what planes we know about could and could not have done. Instead, try looking at all the evidence, and discover the attributes of the plane that did what all the evidence proves it did. Friends, this crime was committed by very evil people. The weapons they used are extremely dangerous. Thanks again to everyone in this community. bc |
 |
 
|
| noeffects | May 11 2009, 09:36 PM Post #2 |
|
I do like games ...but there is a time and place ... That hint you gave,IMO, sucks.. I'd rather you did spell it out directly ... If it's about attributes of a plane, and what it is capable of , why not just spill the beans?
got that right friend ... |
|
|
|
| Craig Ranke CIT | May 11 2009, 10:49 PM Post #3 |
|
Look who's back. All CIT detractors who used their real names have given up or disappeared and deleted their websites because they were discredited. So out come the anonymous liars with no reputation to risk to bust out with another layer of disinfo in a desperate obfuscation effort. The recent spike in attention to CIT, Lloyde, and the north side approach is a serious threat so time to bust out with the fake truthers with fake research and fake information. They will hide behind silly screen names and try to play little games without a care in the world of what people think over-all because their only goal is obfuscation. "biscuit cough" and his alter-ego "stinkey puh" have been staunch north side supporters since day one but have ALWAYS worked hard to disprove a flyover and attack CIT. That right there exposes them as disinfo because not a single pilot, engineer, scholar, skeptic, or even obsessed CIT detractor who uses their real name will even begin to suggest that a north side impact is possible. This guy has no evidence and he has nothing legitimate to offer which is why he is toying with the forum. I can't see why that would be allowed but if allowed to stay at all my vote is to make him bring his little game to the "skeptic" forum. |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic » |
4:07 AM Nov 27
